Skip to main content

A Comparative Study on PSO with Other Metaheuristic Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applying Particle Swarm Optimization

Abstract

The research and development of metaheuristic methods are critical issues in computer science. In the past decade, metaheuristic algorithms have been used in many engineering applications such as optimization of engineering problems, telecommunications, information security, and image processing. Many metaheuristic algorithms such as particle swarm optimization (PSO), ant colony optimization (ACO), and genetic algorithm (GA) are recently becoming very popular.

There are many studies conducted in the literature on the comparison of PSO with other metaheuristic algorithms. In this chapter, various studies carried out between the years of 2010 and 2020 about the comparison of PSO with the other metaheuristic algorithms will be examined. The metaheuristic algorithms to be considered are simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), ant colony optimization (ACO), artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm, particle swarm optimization (PSO), tabu search (TS), harmony search (HS), firefly algorithm (FF), cuckoo search (CS), bat-inspired algorithm (BA), water wave optimization (WWO), clonal selection algorithm (CLONALG), chemical reaction optimization (CRO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA), glowworm swarm optimization (GSO), and grey wolf optimizer (GWO). This study aims to evaluate and analyze the covered papers according to several criteria such as (a) rates of studies according to publishing years, (b) the metaheuristic algorithms that are compared to PSO, (c) performance evaluation of compared algorithms, (d) the metaheuristic algorithms with their inspirational approaches and their initial proposed studies and years, (e) the field of subjects where the algorithms are applied in the reviewed studies, and (f) used databases in the examined studies.

This study is a comprehensive literature review of the comparison of PSO with the most popular metaheuristic algorithms. The intention of this review is to be useful for researchers who want to conduct a survey on this area of the subject as this chapter will cover the essential and helpful analysis of the related research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adetunji, K. E., Hofsajer, I., & Cheng, L. (2020). Optimal DG allocation and sizing in power system networks using swarm-based algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08089. (19 Feb).

  • Adnan, M. A., & Razzaque, M. A. (2013). A comparative study of particle swarm optimization and cuckoo search techniques through problem-specific distance function: International Conference of Information and Communication Technology. Depok: ICoICT.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adrian, A. M., Utamima, A., & Wang, K.-J. (2014). A comparative study of GA, PSO, and ACO for solving construction site layout optimization. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19, 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1467-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmid, A., Dao, T.-M., & Van Ngan, L. Ê. (2019). Comparison study of discrete optimization problem using meta-heuristic approaches: A case study. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IJIEOM), 1(2), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ta’i, Z. T. M., & Al-Hameed, O. Y. A. (2013). Comparison between PSO and firefly algorithms in fingerprint authentication. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 3, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asghari, S., & Navimipour, N. J. (2015). Review and comparison of meta-heuristic algorithms for service composition in cloud computing: Majlesi. Journal of Multimedia Processing, 4, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assareh, E., Behrang, M. A., Assari, M. R., & Ghanbarzadeh, A. (2010). Application of PSO (particle swarm optimization) and GA (genetic algorithm) techniques on demand estimation of oil in Iran. Energy, 35(12), 5223–5229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadeh, A., Taghipour, M., Asadzadeh, S. M., & Abdollahi, M. (2014). Artificial immune simulation for improved forecasting of electricity consumption with random variations: Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijepes. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 55, 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaee, M., & Sharifian, S. (2018). Calibration of triaxial magnetometers for IoT applications using metaheuristic methods. 4th Iranian Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashiri, M., & Karimi, H. (2010). An analytical comparison to heuristic and meta-heuristic solution methods for quadratic assignment problem: The 40th International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIE.2010.5668262.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Basturk, B., & Karaboga, D. (2006). An artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for numeric function optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE swarm intelligence symposium (pp. 12–14). New York: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calçada, D., Rosa, A., Duarte, L. C., & Lopes, V. V. (2010). Comparison of GA and PSO performance in parameter estimation of microbial growth models: A case-study using experimental data. New York: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2010.5586489.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Civicioglu, P., & Besdok, E. (2011). A conceptual comparison of the Cuckoo-search, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and artificial bee colony algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 39, 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9276-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., Singh, P. K., Bhowmik, S., Sarkar, R., & Nasipuri, M. (2016). A harmony search based wrapper feature selection method for holistic bangla word recognition. Procedia Computer Science, 89, 395–403. Twelfth International Multi-Conference on Information Processing (IMCIP).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castro, L.N., & Von Zuben, F.J. (2000). The clonal selection algorithm with engineering applications. In: GECCO 2002—Workshop Proceedings, pp. 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, R., & Shen, Q. (2012). Feature selection with harmony search. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part-B: Cybernetics, 42, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., & Stutzle, T. (2006). Ant colony optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Society, 1, 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, R., & Dikshit, O. (2013). A comparison of particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) in second-order design (SOD) of GPS networks. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 7, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-0045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, R. C., & Kennedy, J. (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on micromachine and human science, Nagoya, Japan, Mar 13–16, 1995 (pp. 39–43). New York: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., Liu, Y., & Tong, X. (2018). Comparison of metaheuristic cellular automata models: A case study of dynamic land-use simulation in the Yangtze River Delta: Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ceus. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 70, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Nieto, J., Nebro, A. J., & Aldana-Monte, J. F. (2015). Solving molecular flexible docking problems with metaheuristics: A comparative study-Esteban López-Camacho María Jesús García Godoy. Applied Soft Computing, 28, 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilas, M. (2010). Heuristic and metaheuristic optimization techniques with application to power systems: Power system Department “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi 21–23 D. Mangeron Blvd., 700050, Iasi ROMANIA Conference Paper October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilas, M. (2016). Heuristic and metaheuristic optimization techniques with application to power systems. In Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on Mathematical methods and computational techniques in electrical engineering. Athens: WSEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geem, Z. W., Kim, J. H., & Loganathan, G. V. (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation, 76(2), 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh, S., & Barati, H. (2012). A comparative study of three metaheuristics for optimum design of trusses. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 3, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, F. (1986). Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Computers and Operations Research, 5, 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(86)90048-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammouche, K., Diaf, M., & Siarry, P. (2010). A comparative study of various meta-heuristic techniques applied to the multi-level thresholding problem: Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/engappai. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 23, 676–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, D. C., Yadav, P., Kumar, R., & Panda, S. K. (2010). A robust harmony search algorithm based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks: IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCW.2010.5503895.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, I., Khanum, A., Abbasi, A. Q., & Javed, M. Y. (2015). A novel approach for software architecture recovery using particle swarm optimization. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 12, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, M. K., & Mousa, M. H. (2020). Efficient task offloading for IoT-based applications in fog computing using ant colony optimization. IEEE Access, 8, 2975741. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, F., & Lichti, D. (2017). A comparison of simulated annealing, genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization in optimal first-order design of indoor TLS networks: ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Volume IV-2/W4, ISPRS geospatial week 2017, 18–22 September, Wuhan, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachitvichyanukul, V. (2012). Comparison of three evolutionary algorithms: GA, PSO, and DE. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 11(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.11.3.215. ISSN 1598-7248│EISSN 2234-6473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kar, A. K. (2016). Bio inspired computing—A review of algorithms and scope of applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 59, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaboğa, D. (2014). Yapay Zekâ Optimizasyon Algoritmaları. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawam, A. A. L., & Mansour, N. (2012). Metaheuristic optimization algorithms for training artificial neural networks. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, K., & Sahai, A. (2012). A comparison of BA, GA, PSO, BP, and LM for training feed-forward neural networks in e-learning context. I. J. Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.07.03. Published Online June 2012 in MECS (http://www.mecs-press.org/).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, D., Jr., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotti, M., Benhala, B., Fakhfakh, M., Ahaitouf, A., Benlahbib, B., Loulou, M., & Mecheqrane, A. (2011). Comparison between PSO and ACO techniques for analog circuit performance optimization. Conference: The International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM). New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICM.2011.6177367.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnanand, K., & Ghose, D. (2009). A glowworm swarm optimization based multi-robot system for signal source localization. Design and Control of Intelligent Robotic Systems, 177, 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaveni, V., & Arumugam, G. (2013). Harmony search-based wrapper feature selection method for 1-nearest neighbour classifier. Proc. Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition Informatics and Mobile Engineering PRIME, 2013, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, V. R., & Desai, V. (2016). ABC and PSO: A comparative analysis: IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC). New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2016.7919625.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M., & Rawat, T. K. (2015). Optimal fractional delay-IIR filter design using cuckoo search algorithm. ISA Transactions, 59, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, R. J., Kuo, P. H., Chen, Y. R., & Zulvia, F. E. (2016). Application of metaheuristics-based clustering algorithm to item assignment in a synchronized zone order picking system. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.03.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Fong, S., & Zhuang, Y. (2015). Optimizing SMOTE by metaheuristics with neural network and decision tree: 3rd International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence. Bali: ISCBI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. M., & Leong, K. Y. (2018). A brief survey on intelligent swarm-based algorithms for solving optimization problems. London: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medani, K. B. O., Sayah, S., & Bekrar, A. (2017). Whale optimization algorithm based optimal reactive power dispatch: A case study of the Algerian power system. Electric Power Systems Research, 163(Part B), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili, S. (2016). SCA: A sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 96, 809–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey Wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., Shaw, K., & Mishra, D. (2012). A new metaheuristic bat inspired classification approach for microarray data. Procedia Technology, 4, 802–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A. M., & Abdelsalam, H. M. (2020). A multicriteria optimization model for cloud service provider selection in multi-cloud environments. Software: Practice and Experience, 50, 925–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavirad, S. J., Schaefer, G., & Ebrahimpour-Komleh, H. (2019). A benchmark of population-based metaheuristic algorithms for high-dimensional multi-level image thresholding, Conference: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2019.8790273.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, J., Naik, B., & Behera, H. S. (2015). A novel chemical reaction optimization based higher order neural network (CRO-HONN) for nonlinear classification. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(3), 1069–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. T., & Truong, A. V. (2015). Distribution network reconfiguration for power loss minimization and voltage profile improvement using cuckoo search algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 68, 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.12.075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyinloye, O. E., Thompson, A. F., Bamisile, M. O., & Alademerin, D. S. (2020). Security assurance system using bat algorithm associated with particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 18, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan, H. (2016). Comparison of particle swarm and differential evolution optimization algorithms considering various benchmark. Journal of Polytechnic, 20(4), 899–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padma, K., & Shiferaw, Y. (2019). A solution to optimal power flow problem using metaheuristic bat algorithm. National Scientific Conference on Emerging Technology (ET), 3(3), 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, S. K., Rai, C. S., & Singh, A. P. (2012). Comparative study of firefly algorithm and particle swarm optimization for noisy nonlinear optimization problems. I.J. Intelligent Systems and Applications, 10, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2012.10.06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiang, Y., Chen, L., & Li, B. (2015). Ant colony optimization applied to web service compositions in cloud computing. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 41, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radfara, N., Amirib, H., & Arabsolghara, A. (2019). Application of metaheuristic algorithms for solving inverse radiative boundary design problems with discrete power levels. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 137, 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman, H., & Kule, M. (2018). Defect tolerant approaches for function mapping in nano-crossbar circuits: Fourth International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN). Bengaluru: ICRCICN.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan, H. S., Bendary, A. F., & Nagy, S. (2017). Particle swarm optimization algorithm for capacitor allocation problem in distribution systems with wind turbine generators. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 84, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.04.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramarao, G., & Chandrasekaran, K. (2019). Representation of severe negative subsequent return stroke by optimization-based channel-base-current function parameters. Materials Today: Proceedings, 11(Part 3), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.12.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, C. C. O., Nunes de Souza, A., Falcão, A. X., & Papa, J. P. (2012). New insights on nontechnical losses characterization through evolutionary-based feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 27, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezk, H., Fathy, A., & Abdelaziz, A. Y. (2017). A comparison of different global MPPT techniques based on meta-heuristic algorithms for photovoltaic system subjected to partial shading conditions: Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser. A Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangwan, V., Sharma, A., Kumar, R., & Rathore, A. K. (2016). Estimation of battery parameters of the equivalent circuit models using meta-heuristic techniques: 1st IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES). New York: IEEE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selvi, V., & Umarani, R. (2010). Comparative analysis of ant colony and particle swarm optimization techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 5, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheijani, O. S., & Izadi, A. (2019). Time optimization during software implementation for timely delivery using meta-heuristic algorithms. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 9, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibalija, T. (2020). Metaheuristic algorithms in industrial process optimization: Performance, comparison, and recommendations. In Intelligent technologies and applications (pp. 270–283). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5232-8_24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, K. (2013). Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storn, R., & Price, K. (1995). Differential evolution-a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces, Technical Report TR-95-012. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar, S., Marsadek, M., Ramasamy, A., & Mokhlis, H. (2018). Grey Wolf optimizer based battery energy storage system sizing for economic operation of microgrid. In IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe). New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2018.8494501.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ülker, E. D. (2017). A PSO/HS based algorithm for optimization tasks computing conference (18–20 July 2017, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Unle, A., & Murat, A. (2010). A discrete particle swarm optimization method for feature selection in binary classification problems: Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eswa. European Journal of Operational Research, 206, 528–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uthayakumar, J., Shankar, N. M. K., & Lakshmanaprabu, S. K. (2018). Financial crisis prediction model using ant colony optimization. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahab, M. N. A., Nefti-Meziani, S., & Atyabi, A. (2015). A comprehensive review of swarm optimization algorithms. PLoS One, 10(5), e0122827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Yang, Y., & Mi, Z. (2014). A genetic -based approach to web service composition in geo distributed cloud environment. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 43, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoubi, A., & Akrami, F. (2019). Proposing a new model for location—routing problem of perishable raw material suppliers with using meta-heuristic algorithms: Journal homepage:www.cell.com/heliyon.

  • Yang, X. S. (2010a). Engineering optimization: An introduction with metaheuristic applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470640425.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X.-S. (2010b). A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In Proceedings of the workshop on nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO) (pp. 65–74). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X.-S. (2010c). Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, 2, 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. S., & Deb, S. (2010). Engineering optimization by cuckoo search. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 1(4), 330–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X.-S., & Deb, S. (2009). Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. In Proceedings of the world congress on nature & biologically inspired computing (pp. 210–214). London: NaBIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X.-S., Deb, S., Fong, S., He, X., & Zhao, Y.-X. (2016). Swarm intelligence to metaheuristics: Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Computer, 49, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2016.292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusup, N., Zain, A. M., & Latib, A. A. (2019). A review of harmony search algorithm-based feature selection method for classification. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 1192, The 2nd International Conference on Data and Information Science 15–16 November 2018, Bandung, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Zhang, M.-X., Zhang, J.-F., & Zheng, Y.-J. (2015). A water wave optimization algorithm with variable population size and comprehensive learning. In D.-S. Huang, V. Bevilacqua, & P. Premaratne (Eds.), Intelligent computing theories and methodologies (pp. 124–136). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeynep Orman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yarat, S., Senan, S., Orman, Z. (2021). A Comparative Study on PSO with Other Metaheuristic Methods. In: Mercangöz, B.A. (eds) Applying Particle Swarm Optimization. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 306. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70281-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics