Skip to main content

Twenty Years of Network Science: A Bibliographic and Co-authorship Network Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Big Data and Social Media Analytics

Abstract

Two decades ago three pioneering papers turned the attention to complex networks and initiated a new era of research, establishing an interdisciplinary field called network science. Namely, these highly-cited seminal papers were written by Watts and Strogatz, Barabási and Albert, and Girvan and Newman on small-world networks, on scale-free networks and on the community structure of complex networks, respectively. In the past 20 years – due to the multidisciplinary nature of the field – a diverse but not divided network science community has emerged. In this chapter, we investigate how this community has evolved over time with respect to speed, diversity and interdisciplinary nature as seen through the growing co-authorship network of network scientists (here the notion refers to a scholar with at least one paper citing at least one of the three aforementioned milestone papers). After providing a bibliographic analysis of 31,763 network science papers, we construct the co-authorship network of 56,646 network scientists and we analyze its topology and dynamics. We shed light on the collaboration patterns of the last 20 years of network science by investigating numerous structural properties of the co-authorship network and by using enhanced data visualization techniques. We also identify the most central authors, the largest communities, investigate the spatiotemporal changes, and compare the properties of the network to scientometric indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barabás, B., Fülöp, O., & Molontay, R. (2019). The co-authorship network and scientific impact of László Lovász. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, 108, 187–192.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barabás, B., Fülöp, O., Molontay, R., & Pályi, G. (2017). Impact of the discovery of fluorous biphasic systems on chemistry: A statistical and network analysis. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5(9), 8108–8118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barabási, A. (2019). Twenty years of network science: From structure to control. In APS March Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2019, pp. S53–001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barabási, A. L. (2003). Linked: The new science of networks. American Journal of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Barabási, A. L., et al. (2016). Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Breugelmans, J. G., Roberge, G., Tippett, C., Durning, M., Struck, D. B., & Makanga, M. M. (2018). Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers. PloS one, 13(9), e0203156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choobdar, S., Ahsen, M. E., Crawford, J., Tomasoni, M., Fang, T., Lamparter, D., Lin, J., Hescott, B., Hu, X., Mercer, J., et al. (2019). Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases. Nature Methods, 16(9), 843–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clauset, A., Newman, M. E., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70(6), 066111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Council, N. R., et al. (2005). Network science committee on network science for future army applications.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., et al. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821–7826.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. International Organization for Standardization. (2020). Officially assigned ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 codes. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/.

  15. Kastrin, A., & Hristovski, D. (2019). Disentangling the evolution of medline bibliographic database: A complex network perspective. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 89, 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kocarev, L., & In, V. (2010). Network science: A new paradigm shift. IEEE Network 24(6), 6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: A review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lella, E., Amoroso, N., Lombardi, A., Maggipinto, T., Tangaro, S., Bellotti, R., Initiative, A. D. N. (2018). Communicability disruption in Alzheimer’s disease connectivity networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 7(1), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Coudounaris, D. N. (2010). Five decades of business research into exporting: A bibliographic analysis. Journal of International Management, 16(1), 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, H., An, H., Wang, Y., Huang, J., & Gao, X. (2016). Evolutionary features of academic articles co-keyword network and keywords co-occurrence network: Based on two-mode affiliation network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 450, 657–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Molontay, R., & Nagy, M. (2019). Two Decades of Network Science as seen through the co-authorship network of network scientists. In International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM. IEEE/ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nagy, M., & Molontay, R. (2020). Twenty years of network science – Supplementary material. https://github.com/marcessz/Twenty-Years-of-Network-Science.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newman, M. (2018). Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Newman, M. E. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newman, M. E. (2006). Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E, 74(3), 036104.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Newman, M. E., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pawar, R. S., Sobhgol, S., Durand, G. C., Pinnecke, M., Broneske, D., & Saake, G. (2019). Codd’s world: Topics and their evolution in the database community publication graph. In Grundlagen von Datenbanken (pp. 74–81).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Su, H. N., & Lee, P. C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tálas, A. (2008). Connected: The power of six degrees.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Uddin, S., Khan, A., & Baur, L. A. (2015). A framework to explore the knowledge structure of multidisciplinary research fields. PloS one, 10(4), e0123537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vespignani, A. (2018). Twenty years of network science. Nature, 558, 528–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Watts, D. J. (2004). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. W. W. Norton & Company is based in New York.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xia, F., Wang, W., Bekele, T. M., & Liu, H. (2017). Big scholarly data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 3(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2014). Scholarly networks analysis. In Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (pp. 1643–1651). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their observations and comment. The research reported in this chapter and carried out at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics has been supported by the National Research Development and Innovation Fund based on the charter of bolster issued by the National Research Development and Innovation Office under the auspices of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology. The research of Roland Molontay was partially supported by the NKFIH K123782 research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Molontay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Molontay, R., Nagy, M. (2021). Twenty Years of Network Science: A Bibliographic and Co-authorship Network Analysis. In: Çakırtaş, M., Ozdemir, M.K. (eds) Big Data and Social Media Analytics. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67044-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics