Abstract
Great strides have been made in the field of CSCL toward fostering diversity at all levels including theory, methods, and technologies. This chapter provides a reflection on the field from the standpoint of the endeavor to provide tools to expedite the work we do as learning scientists. It points to some notable existing resources while also exploring the reasons why the development of high-profile, wide distribution tools to support the work has not been a priority for the community. It then provides a vision for future work that respects these reasons but points to ways community resources might be better served with greater care and attention allocated to this vision.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Many tools and resources are available for free and open download at the following URLs:
Discussion Affordances for Natural Collaborative Exchange (DANCE) http://dance.cs.cmu.edu
FROG https://github.com/chili-epfl/FROG
LearnSphere http://learnsphere.org/
References
Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 92–124.
Berkowitz, M. W., & Gibbs, J. C. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 399–410.
Bird, S., & Loper, E. (2004). NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on interactive poster and demonstration sessions (p. 31). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Buckingham-Shum, S. (2013). Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on discourse-centric analytics, workshop held in conjunction with learning analytics and knowledge 2013, Leuven, Belgium.
Buckingham-Shum, S., de Laat, M., de Liddo, A., Ferguson, R., & Whitelock, D. (2014). Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on discourse-centric analytics, workshop held in conjunction with learning analytics and knowledge 2014, Indianapolis, IN.
Chapman, W. W., Nadkarni, P. M., Hirschman, L., D’avolio, L. W., Savova, G. K., & Uzuner, O. (2011). Overcoming barriers to NLP for clinical text: The role of shared tasks and the need for additional creative solutions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(5), 540–543. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000465.
Cook, J., Ley, T., Maier, R., Mor, Y., Santos, P., Lex, E., Dennerlein, S., Trattner, C., & Holley, D. (2015). Using the hybrid social learning network to explore concepts, practices, designs and smart services for networked professional learning. In Y. Li, M. Chang, M. Kravcik, E. Popescu, R. Huang, & N.-S. C. Kinshuk (Eds.), State-of-the-art and future directions of smart learning, proceedings of international conference on smart learning environments (ICSLE 2015), 23–25 Sep’15, Sinaia, Romania. Heidelberg: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, Springer-Verlag, GmbH.
Dillenbourg, P. (2015). Orchestration graphs. Lausanne: EPFL Press.
Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2003). Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source course management system. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), EdMedia + innovate learning (pp. 171–178). North Carolina, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008). Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 447–470.
Fiacco, J. & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Towards domain general detection of transactive knowledge building behavior. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Learning@Scale.
Gweon, G., Jain, M., Mc Donough, J., Raj, B., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). Measuring prevalence of other-oriented transactive contributions using an automated measure of speech style accommodation. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 245–265.
HÃ¥klev, S., Faucon, L., Olsen, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2019). FROG, a tool to author and run orchestration graphs: Affordances and tensions. In Proceedings of the 13th conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2019 special interactive session.
Håklev, S., Faucon, L., Hadzilacos, T., & Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Orchestration Graphs: Enabling rich social pedagogical scenarios in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM conference on Learning@Scale (pp. 261–264). ACM.
Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Derntl, M., Pozzi, F., Chacón, J., Prieto, L. P., & Persico, D. (2018). An integrated environment for learning design. Frontiers in ICT, 5, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00009.
Iida, R., Komachi, M., Inoue, N., Inui, K., & Matsumoto, Y. (2017). NAIST text corpus: Annotating predicate-argument and coreference relations in Japanese. In N. Ide & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Handbook of linguistic annotation (pp. 1177–1196). Dordrecht: Springer.
Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.
Kirschner, P. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 7–47). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Nelson, B. (2017). Building the intentional university: Minerva and the future of higher education. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kulkarni, C., Cambre, J., Kotturi, Y., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. R. (2015). Talkabout: Making distance matter with small groups in massive classes. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1116–1128). ACM.
Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., & Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial dialogue as adaptive collaborative learning support. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 158, 383.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). The savage mind. Letchworth: Garden City Press.
Liberman, M., & Cieri, C. (1998). The creation, distribution and use of linguistic data: The case of the linguistic data consortium. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC) (pp. 159–164).
Malmasi, S., Wong, S. M. J., & Dras, M. (2013). NLI shared task 2013: MQ submission. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications (pp. 124–133).
Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: system demonstrations (pp. 55–60).
Matuk, C., Tissenbaum, M., & Schneider, B. (Eds.). (2019). Real-time orchestrational technologies in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 251–414.
Mayfield, E., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). LightSIDE: Open source machine learning for text. In Handbook of automated essay evaluation (pp. 146–157). New York: Routledge.
McCallum, A. K. (1996). Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/mccallum/bow/.
McLaren, B., Scheuer, O., De Laat, M., Hever, R., de Groot, R. & Rosé, C. P. (2007). Using machine learning techniques to analyze and support mediation of student E-discussions. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on artificial intelligence in education: Building technology rich learning contexts that work (pp. 331–338).
Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C. P., & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 138, 285–305.
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.
Rosé, C., Wang, Y. C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 237–271.
Rosé, C. P. (2017). Expediting the cycle of data to intervention. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(1), 59–62. Special issue on learning analytics.
Rummel, N., Walker, E., & Aleven, V. (2016). Different futures of adaptive collaborative learning support. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 784–795.
Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36.
Sobreira, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2012). A model for flexibly editing CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 567–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9157-9.
Sobreira, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2015). Table-based representations can be used to offer easy-to-use, flexible, and adaptable learning scenario editors reference. Computers & Education, 80, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.002.
Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2000). Knowledge acquisition for adaptive collaborative learning environments. In AAAI fall symposium: Learning how to do things (pp. 251–262).
Soller, A., MartÃnez, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(4), 261–290.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 479–500). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.
Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, C. Pontecorvo, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Villasclaras-Fernández, E., Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). Web collage: An implementation of support for assessment design in CSCL macro-scripts. Computers and Education, 67, 79–97.
Vogel, F., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (this volume). Collaboration scripts: Guiding, internalizing, and adapting. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning. Cham: Springer.
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71–95.
Wise, A. F., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 423–467.
Yang, Q., Banovic, N., & Zimmerman, J. (2018a). Mapping machine learning advances from HCI research to reveal starting places for design innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (p. 130). ACM.
Yang, Q., Scuito, A., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Steinfeld, A. (2018b). Investigating how experienced UX designers effectively work with machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference (pp. 585–596). ACM.
Further Readings
Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. In this chapter, we have made a distinction between tools and technologies, but this survey article by Jeong and Hmelo-Silver provides a synergistic conceptual framework for thinking about technologies.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Nelson, B. (2017). Building the intentional university: Minerva and the future of higher education. Cambridge: MIT Press. Throughout this chapter, we have mentioned several tools developed within the Minerva project, which are further described in Kosslyn and Nelson’s 2017 book. We offer it as a highly relevant additional source of information on tools and technologies for learning.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosé, C., Dimitriadis, Y. (2021). Tools and Resources for Setting Up Collaborative Spaces. In: Cress, U., Rosé, C., Wise, A.F., Oshima, J. (eds) International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65290-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65291-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)