Abstract
Using data from two studies of scientific reasoning, this chapter explores whether transactive discussion is the basis of productive peer collaborations and questions what role the partner plays in the apparent effectiveness of this type of discussion. In the first study, dyads who engaged in transactive discussion showed more improvement than dyads who did not have transactive discussions. In the second study, both dyads and children working alone showed improvement related to talk in general. However, dyads produced more transactive types of talk and showed a more complex understanding of the problem that they generated more quickly. Having a partner was not a necessary or sufficient condition for producing transactive talk but increased likelihood that it would occur. The data from these studies suggest that the value of peer collaborations may be that the presence of a partner provides a natural context for elaborating one’s own reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202–221.
Berkowitz, M. W. (Ed.). (1985). New directions for child development: Peer conflict and psychological growth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Berkowitz, M. W., & Gibbs, J. C. (1983). Measuring the development of features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 399–410.
Bivens, J. A., & Berk, L. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the development of elementary school children’s private speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 443–463.
Cohen, A. R. (1961). Cognitive tuning a factor affecting impression formation. Journal of Personality, 29, 235–245.
Damon, W., & Killen, M. (1982). Peer interaction and the process of change in children’s moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28, 347–367.
Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Education Research, 13, 9–19.
Davis, J. H., Stasser, G., Spitzer, C. E., & Holt, R. W. (1976). Changes in group members’ preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1177–1187.
Diaz, R. M., (1992). Methodological concerns in the study of private speech. In R. M. Diaz & L. E. Berk (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to s elf-regulation (pp. 55–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Diaz, R. M., & Berk, L. E. (Eds.). (1992). Private speech: From social interaction to self- regulation . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dunbar, K., & Klahr, D. (1989). Developmental differences in scientific discovery strategies. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 109–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellis, S., & Gauvain, M. (1992). Social and cultural influences on children’s collaborative interactions. In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s development within social contexts (pp. 155–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.
Gauvain, M., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Collaborative problem solving and children’s problem solving skills. Developmental Psychology, 25, 139–151.
Giles, H., & St. Clair, R. N. (Eds.). (1985). Recent advances in language, communication, and social psychology. New York: Erlbaum.
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Klahr, D., Dunbar, K., & Fay, A. L. (1990). Designing good experiments to test “bad” hypotheses. In J. Schräger & P. Langley (Eds.), Computational models of discovery and theory information. San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufman.
Klahr, D., Fay, A., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 111–146.
Kruger, A. C. (1992). The effect of peer and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 191–211.
Kruger, A. C., & Tomasello, M. (1986). Transactive discussions with peers and adults. Developmental Psychology, 22, 681–685.
Kuhn, D., & Brannock, J. (1977). Development of the isolation of variables scheme in experimental and “natural experiment” contexts. Developmental Psychology, 13, 9–13.
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O’Laughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. New York: Academic Press.
Light, P., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1989). Social context effects in learning and testing. In A. Gellantly, D. Rogers, & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Cognition and social worlds (pp. 99–112). Oxford, England: Claredon Press.
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published, 1932).
Pontecorvo, C. (1987). Discussing for reasoning: The role of argument in knowledge construction. In E. DeCorte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, & P. Span (Eds.), Learning and instruction: A publication of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. (Vol. 1, pp. 71–82). Oxford, England: Leuven University Press.
Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365–395.
Schauble, L. (1990). Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 31–57.
Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150–171). Washington, DC: APA Press.
Sproull, L., & Keisler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in networked organizations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children’s peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 3, 207–220.
Teasley, S. D., & Resnick, L. B. (1993). Social influences and cognitive change: Peer collaboration in a causal reasoning task. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74–83.
Tudge, J. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian analysis. Child Development, 63, 1364–1379.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162–179). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Zajonc, R. B. (1960). The process of cognitive tuning in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 159–167.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teasley, S.D. (1997). Talking About Reasoning: How Important Is the Peer in Peer Collaboration?. In: Resnick, L.B., Säljö, R., Pontecorvo, C., Burge, B. (eds) Discourse, Tools and Reasoning. NATO ASI Series, vol 160. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08337-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03362-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive