Abstract
This chapter presents a microanalysis of video-mediated interaction in the specific institutional setting of post-operative consultations. The analysis focuses on the patients’ intimates, who were present at, and sometimes contributed to, the consultation. We examined the participation of companions in 13 video-consultations. In most cases, the companion served as a facilitating bystander, invisible for the physician and thus maintaining the physician-patient dyad as the dominant framework for the interaction. We found that companions were rarely invited to talk unless they appeared on-screen and were noticed by the physician. Self-initiated turns by companion consisted of crosstalk with the patient, while companions also directly addressed the physician with relevant information. Physicians, in response, ratified companions, but rarely actively invited them to participate. Overall, companions’ on-screen appearance seemed crucial for their participation, which suggests that the role of companions in video-consultations is fundamentally different from how they participate in face-to-face consultations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beisecker, A. (1989). The influence of a companion on the doctor-elderly patient interaction. Health Communication, 1(1), 55–70.
Benwell, B., & McCreaddie, M. (2016). Keeping “small talk” small in health-care encounters: Negotiating the boundaries between on- and off-task talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1196548
Bou-Franch, P., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2014). Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics, 73, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1060/j.pragma.2014.05.001
Bou-Franch, P., Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2012). Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 501–521.
Drew, P. (2009). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25(1), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fioramonte, A., & Vásquez, C. (2019). Multi-party talk in the medical encounter: Socio-pragmatic functions of family members’ contributions in the treatment advice phase. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.001
Giles, D., & Newbold, J. (2013). ‘Is this normal?’ The role of category predicates in constructing mental illness online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12022
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Interactive footing. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp. 16–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hasselkus, B. (1992). The family caregiver as interpreter in the geriatric medical interview. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 6(3), 288–304.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 35–54). London: Routledge.
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huber, J., Streuli, J., Lozankovski, N., Stredele, R., Moll, P., Hohenfellner, M., … Peters, T. (2016). The complex interplay of physician, patient, and spouse in preopreative counseling for radical prostatectomy: A comparative mixed-method analysis of 30 videotaped consultations. Psycho-Oncology, 25, 949–956. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4041
Hutchby, I. (2001a). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hutchby, I. (2001b). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 14–31). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Laidsaar-Powell, R. C., Butow, P. N., Charles, C., Lam, W. W. T., Jansen, J., McCaffery, K. J., … Juraskova, I. (2013). Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: A systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 91(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007
Licoppe, C. (2017). Skype appearances, multiple greetings and ‘coucou’. The sequential organization of video-mediated conversation openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), 351–386.
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: ‘Talking heads’ and the multimodal organization of mobile and skype video calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
Meredith, J., & Stokoe, L. (2014). Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘chat’ with spoken interaction. Discourse and Communication, 8(2), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510815
Miller, E. A. (2003). The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: Effects on doctor-patient communication. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, 1–7.
Mondada, L. (2007). Imbrications de la technologie et de l’ordre interactionnel. L’organisation de vérifications et d’identifications de problèmes pendant la visioconférence. Réseaux, 5, 141–182.
Mondada, L. (2010). Eröffnungen und Prä-Eröffnungen in medienvermittelter Interaktion: Das Beispiel Videokonferenzen. In L. Mondada & R. Schmitt (Eds.), Situationseröffnungen: Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion (pp. 277–334). Tübingen: Narr.
Norrick, N. (1987). Functions of repetition in conversation. Text, 7, 245–264.
Oittinen, T. (2018). Multimodal accomplishment of alignment and affiliation in the local space of distant meetings. Culture and Organization, 24(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2017.1386189
Olbertz-Siitonen, M. (2015). Transmission delay in technology-mediated interaction at work. PsychNology Journal, 13(2-3), 203–234.
Pappas, Y., & Seale, C. (2009). The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: An analysis of interaction. Social Science and Medicine, 68, 1229–1237.
Pappas, Y., & Seale, C. (2010). The physical examination in telecardiology and televascular consultations: A study using conversation analysis. Patient Education and Counselling, 81, 113–118.
Paulus, T., Warren, A., & Lester, J. N. (2016). Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review. Discourse, Context & Media, 12, 1–10.
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Stommel, W., Van Goor, H., & Stommel, M. (2019). Other-attentiveness in video-consultation openings: A conversation analysis of video-mediated versus face-to-face consultations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(6), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz015
Stommel, W., & Koole, T. (2010). The Online Support Group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies, 12(3), 357–378.
Stommel, W., & Te Molder, H. (2015). Counselling online and over the phone: When pre-closing questions fail as a closing device. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058605
Wasson, C. (2006). Being in two spaces at once: Virtual meetings and their representation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 16(1), 103–130.
Zilliacus, E. M., Meiser, B., Lobb, E. A., Kelly, P. J., Barlow-Stewart, K., Kirk, J. A., … Tucker, K. M. (2011). Are videoconferenced consultations as effective as face-to-face consultations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling? Genetics in Medicine, 13(11), 933–941. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182217a19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stommel, W.J.P., Stommel, M.W.J. (2021). Participation of Companions in Video-Mediated Medical Consultations: A Microanalysis. In: Meredith, J., Giles, D., Stommel, W. (eds) Analysing Digital Interaction. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64922-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64922-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64921-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64922-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)