Skip to main content

A Novel Tool for Online Community Moderator Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12427))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3353 Accesses

Abstract

This study introduces a new instrument for leadership evaluation in online forums and other online communities which was developed using a grounded approach. Questions that emerged from the literature were then evaluated to create hypotheses that guided the development of an instrument for moderator evaluation. The Moderator Evaluation Contingency Scale (MECS) is modified from Fiedler’s contingency model to determine if a moderator is more task- or relationship-oriented in his or her approach to moderation and interactions with other members of a community. The MECS was developed and tested on Reddit in 2013–2014 using random sampling for Forum selection, moderator selection, and interactions with users. A content analysis using the MECS to evaluate posts was found to be a viable measure of a moderator’s ability to perform tasks like removing content as well as his or her ability to interact with users. Bots were analyzed using the MECS as well to determine bias. Next steps include making the instrument available for use by social media and niche community sites, administrators, and other moderators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anders, G.: Technology- what is reddit worth?-The Web’s antibullying, meme-spawning, porn-flecked link forum may go down as one of the shrewdest buys in the media business. Forbes, 56 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S.S.: Adding the “E” to E-Leadership: how it may impact your leadership. Organ. Dyn. 31(4), 325–338 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00133-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S., Dodge, G.E.: E-leadership: implications for theory, research, and practice. Lead. Q. 11(4), 615–668 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avolio, B.J., Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S., Baker, B.: E-leadership: re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. Lead. Q. 25(1), 105–131 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balthazard, P.A., Waldman, D.A., Warren, J.E.: Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams. Lead. Q. 20(5), 651–663 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cascio, W.F., Shurygailo, S.: E-leadership and virtual teams. Organ. Dyn. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, J., Xu, H., Whinston, A.B.: Moderated online communities and quality of user-generated content. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 28(2), 237–268 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cherry, K.: Lewin’s leadership styles. Psychology (2011). http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/a/leadstyles.htm

  9. Cheshire, C.: Online trust, trustworthiness, or assurance? Daedalus 140(4), 49–58 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L., Riedl, J.: How oversight improves member-maintained communities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 11–20 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crosby, B.C., Bryson, J.M.: Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Lead. Q. 21(2), 211–230 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Day, D.V., Fleenor, J.W., Atwater, L.E., Sturm, R.E., McKee, R.A.: Advances in leader and leadership development: a review of 25 years of research and theory. Lead. Q. 25(1), 63–82 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Delort, J., Arunasalam, B., Paris, C.: Automatic moderation of online discussion sites. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 15(3), 9–30 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dibbell, J.: Mutilated furries, flying phalluses: put the blame on griefers, the sociopaths of the virtual world. Wired Mag. 16(2), 16–20 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dinh, J.E., Lord, R.G., Gardner, W.L., Meuser, J.D., Liden, R.C., Hu, J.: Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Lead. Q. 25(1), 36–62 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fiedler, F.E.: Predicting the effects of leadership training and experience from the contingency model. J. Appl. Psychol. 56(2), 114 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fiedler, F.E., Mahar, L.: A field experiment validating contingency model leadership training. J. Appl. Psychol. 64(3), 247 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gairín-Sallán, J., Rodríguez-Gómez, D., Armengol-Asparó, C.: Who exactly is the moderator? A consideration of online knowledge management network moderation in educational organisations. Comput. Educ. 55(1), 304–312 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gazan, R.: Understanding the rogue user. In: Nahl, D., Bilal, D. (eds.) Information and Emotion: The Emergent Affective Paradigm in Information Behavior Research and Theory. Information Today, pp. 177–185 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gleave, E., Welser, H.T., Lento, T.M., Smith, M.A.: A conceptual and operational definition of “social role” in online community. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.6

  22. Grimes, J.M., Jaeger, P.T., Fleischmann, K.R.: Obfuscatocracy: a stakeholder analysis of governing documents for virtual worlds. First Monday 13(9) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M., Wu, F.: Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.1045 (2008)

  24. Hussain, S.T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M.J., Hussain, S.H., Ali, M.: Kurt Lewin’s change model: a critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. J. Innov. Knowl. 3(3), 123–127 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, R., Kahai, S., Jestice, R.: The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5), 1098–1110 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kerr, S., Harlan, A.: Predicting the effects of leadership training and experience from the contingency model: some remaining problems. J. Appl. Psychol. 57(2), 114–117 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kirman, B., Lineham, C., Lawson, S.: Exploring mischief and mayhem in social computing or: how we learned to stop worrying and love the trolls. In: CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 121–130 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lurey, J.S., Raisinghani, M.S.: An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Inf. Manag. 38(8), 523–544 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maslennikova, L.: Leader-centered versus follower-centered leadership styles. Lead. Adv. Online 14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mitchell, A.: Interventions for effectively leading in a virtual setting. Bus. Horiz. 55(5), 431–439 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Purvanova, R.K., Bono, J.E.: Transformational leadership in context: face-to-face and virtual teams. Lead. Q. 20(3), 343–357 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reddit: Reddit Content Policy (2020). https://www.redditinc.com/policies/content-policy

  33. Tseng, J.J., Tsai, Y.H., Chao, R.C.: Enhancing L2 interaction in avatar-based virtual worlds: student teachers’ perceptions. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 29(3), 357–371 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vlachopoulos, P., Cowan, J.: Reconceptualising moderation in asynchronous online discussions using grounded theory. Distance Educ. 31(1), 23–36 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zaccaro, S.J., Bader, P.: E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams: minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. Organ. Dyn. 31(4), 377–387 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia J. W. Takaoka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Takaoka, A.J.W. (2020). A Novel Tool for Online Community Moderator Evaluation. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12427. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60152-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics