Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12429))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1254 Accesses

Abstract

This work investigates the applicability of the elaboration likelihood model and its dual process mechanism to explain how features of the automated driving experience are perceived and, in turn, are processed by passengers to evaluate the driving experience in terms of passenger well-being. For this purpose, a user study with real-world experience of automated driving using a Wizard of Oz prototype was conducted. Eighty-four participants were assigned randomly to four different groups of elaboration likelihood by manipulating their motivation and ability to perceive and process features of the automated driving experience. Results indicate that the elaboration likelihood model and its two routes of processing apply to automated driving. Participants with higher levels of elaboration likelihood perceived more features of the driving experience, spent more cognitive effort on processing them, and consulted a larger variety of passenger needs to determine the effect of features on passenger well-being. Understanding the underlying mechanism of how passengers perceive and process features of automated vehicles may assist in design decisions of such vehicles to create a pleasant experience, high levels of passenger well-being, and ultimately boost the acceptance and willingness to use automated vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Addam, M., Knye, M., Matusiewicz, D.: Automotive Health in Deutschland. Wenn die Gesundheitsbranche auf die Automobilindustrie trifft. Springer, Wiesbaden (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20876-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. JLR: Jaguar Land Rover’s New Shape-Shifting Seat of the Future Makes You Think You’re Walking (2020). https://www.jaguarlandrover.com/news/2020/01/jaguar-land-rovers-new-shape-shifting-seat-future-makes-you-think-youre-walking. Accessed 16 Jan 2020

  3. Hiemstra-van Mastrigt, S., Kamp, I., van Veen, S.A.T., Vink, P., Bosch, T.: The influence of active seating on car passengers’ perceived comfort and activity levels. Appl. Ergon. 47, 211–219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.004

  4. Mercedes-Benz: Ganzheitliches Konzept für mehr Wohlbefinden und Fitness: Mercedes-Benz “Fit & Healthy”: Komfort wird noch intelligenter (2017). http://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/de/instance/ko/Ganzheitliches-Konzept-fuer-mehr-Wohlbefinden-und-Fitness-Mercedes-Benz-Fit–Healthy-Komfort-wird-noch-intelligenter.xhtml?oid=15181280. Accessed 11 May 2018

  5. SAE: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems, 2016th edn. SAE (SAE J3016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. AUDI AG: Audi Aicon (2017). https://www.audi-mediacenter.com/en/audi-aicon-2017-9299

  7. Daimler: Mercedes-Benz F 015 Luxury in Motion (2015). https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/ko/de/9906573. Accessed 7 Jan 2020

  8. Volvo Car Group: Volvo Cars’ New 360c Autonomous Concept: Reimagining the Work-life Balance and the Future of Cities (2018). https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-gb/media/pressreleases/237020/volvo-cars-new-360c-autonomous-concept-reimagining-the-work-life-balance-and-the-future-of-cities. Accessed 16 Apr 2020

  9. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19, 123–205 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraus, J.M., Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Baumann, M.: Two routes to trust calibration: effects of reliability and brand information on trust in automation. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 11(3), 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2019070101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, P., Xu, Z., Zhao, X.: Road tests of self-driving vehicles. Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 124, 354–369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., Krems, J.F.: How usability can save the day - methodological considerations for making automated driving a success story. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI 2018, Toronto, ON, Canada, 23–25 September 2018, pp. 278–290. ACM Press, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239076

  13. Oborne, D.J.: Passenger comfort - an overview. Appl. Ergon. 9(3), 131–136 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(78)90002-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahn, Y.-J., Kim, I., Hyun, S.S.: Critical in-flight and ground-service factors influencing brand prestige and relationships between brand prestige, well-being perceptions, and brand loyalty: first class passengers. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 32(sup1), S114–S138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1008666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Senn, T., Falter, M., Ruster, P., Hadwich, K.: Automated driving - creating gain or reducing pain? An empirical study of direct and mediated effects on wellbeing. In: GMFC 2018, pp. 1580–1583 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15444/GMC2018.13.08.01

  16. Ma, L., Zhang, X., Ding, X., Wang, G.: Bike sharing and users’ subjective well-being. An empirical study in China. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 118, 14–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sauer, V., Mertens, A., Heitland, J., Nitsch, V.: Exploring the concept of passenger well-being in the context of automated driving. Int. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. 6(3), 227–248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2019.104594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klimmt, C.: Das Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell, 1st edn. Nomos, Baden-Baden (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brunner, C.B., Ullrich, S., Jungen, P., Esch, F.-R.: Impact of symbolic design on brand evaluations. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 25(3), 307–320 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reilhac, P., Moizard, J., Kaiser, F., Hottelart, K.: Cockpitkonzept für das teilautomatisierte Fahren. ATZ 118(3), 44–49 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, J., Kim, H.-S., Kim, W., Yoon, D.: Take-over performance analysis depending on the drivers’ non-driving secondary tasks in automated vehicles. In: ICT convergence powered by smart intelligence. ICTC 2018: the 9th International Conference on ICT Convergence, Maison Glad Jeju, Jeju Island, Korea, 17–19 October 2018, pp. 1364–1366 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Radford, S.K., Bloch, P.H.: Linking innovation to design: consumer responses to visual product newness. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28(S1), 208–220 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00871.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Homburg, C., Schwemmle, M., Kuehnl, C.: New product design: concept, measurement, and consequences. J. Mark. 79(3), 41–56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmadpour, N., Lindgaard, G., Robert, J.-M., Pownall, B.: The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin. Ergonomics 57(6), 801–815 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.899632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of Oz studies - why and how. In: Gray, W.D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 1st international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, Orlando, Florida, USA, 04–07 January 1993, pp. 193–200. ACM, New York (1993). https://doi.org/10.1145/169891.169968

  26. Festner, M., Eicher, A., Schramm, D.: Beeinflussung der Komfort- und Sicherheitswahrnehmung beim hochautomatisierten Fahren durch fahrfremde Tätigkeit und Spurwechseldynamik. In: Uni-Das, E.V. (ed.) 11. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme und automatisiertes Fahren, Walting im Altmühltal, Germany, 29–31 March 2017, pp. 63–73 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank AUDI AG, Germany, for their contribution to this research. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of AUDI AG, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Sauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sauer, V., Mertens, A., Reiche, M., Mai, C., Heitland, J., Nitsch, V. (2020). Perception and Processing in Automated Driving – A Dual Process Application. In: Stephanidis, C., Duffy, V.G., Streitz, N., Konomi, S., Krömker, H. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Digital Human Modeling and Ergonomics, Mobility and Intelligent Environments. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12429. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59987-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59987-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59986-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59987-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics