Abstract
This work investigates the applicability of the elaboration likelihood model and its dual process mechanism to explain how features of the automated driving experience are perceived and, in turn, are processed by passengers to evaluate the driving experience in terms of passenger well-being. For this purpose, a user study with real-world experience of automated driving using a Wizard of Oz prototype was conducted. Eighty-four participants were assigned randomly to four different groups of elaboration likelihood by manipulating their motivation and ability to perceive and process features of the automated driving experience. Results indicate that the elaboration likelihood model and its two routes of processing apply to automated driving. Participants with higher levels of elaboration likelihood perceived more features of the driving experience, spent more cognitive effort on processing them, and consulted a larger variety of passenger needs to determine the effect of features on passenger well-being. Understanding the underlying mechanism of how passengers perceive and process features of automated vehicles may assist in design decisions of such vehicles to create a pleasant experience, high levels of passenger well-being, and ultimately boost the acceptance and willingness to use automated vehicles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Addam, M., Knye, M., Matusiewicz, D.: Automotive Health in Deutschland. Wenn die Gesundheitsbranche auf die Automobilindustrie trifft. Springer, Wiesbaden (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20876-9
JLR: Jaguar Land Rover’s New Shape-Shifting Seat of the Future Makes You Think You’re Walking (2020). https://www.jaguarlandrover.com/news/2020/01/jaguar-land-rovers-new-shape-shifting-seat-future-makes-you-think-youre-walking. Accessed 16 Jan 2020
Hiemstra-van Mastrigt, S., Kamp, I., van Veen, S.A.T., Vink, P., Bosch, T.: The influence of active seating on car passengers’ perceived comfort and activity levels. Appl. Ergon. 47, 211–219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.004
Mercedes-Benz: Ganzheitliches Konzept für mehr Wohlbefinden und Fitness: Mercedes-Benz “Fit & Healthy”: Komfort wird noch intelligenter (2017). http://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/de/instance/ko/Ganzheitliches-Konzept-fuer-mehr-Wohlbefinden-und-Fitness-Mercedes-Benz-Fit–Healthy-Komfort-wird-noch-intelligenter.xhtml?oid=15181280. Accessed 11 May 2018
SAE: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems, 2016th edn. SAE (SAE J3016) (2016)
AUDI AG: Audi Aicon (2017). https://www.audi-mediacenter.com/en/audi-aicon-2017-9299
Daimler: Mercedes-Benz F 015 Luxury in Motion (2015). https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/ko/de/9906573. Accessed 7 Jan 2020
Volvo Car Group: Volvo Cars’ New 360c Autonomous Concept: Reimagining the Work-life Balance and the Future of Cities (2018). https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-gb/media/pressreleases/237020/volvo-cars-new-360c-autonomous-concept-reimagining-the-work-life-balance-and-the-future-of-cities. Accessed 16 Apr 2020
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19, 123–205 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
Kraus, J.M., Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Baumann, M.: Two routes to trust calibration: effects of reliability and brand information on trust in automation. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 11(3), 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2019070101
Liu, P., Xu, Z., Zhao, X.: Road tests of self-driving vehicles. Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 124, 354–369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.004
Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., Krems, J.F.: How usability can save the day - methodological considerations for making automated driving a success story. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI 2018, Toronto, ON, Canada, 23–25 September 2018, pp. 278–290. ACM Press, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239076
Oborne, D.J.: Passenger comfort - an overview. Appl. Ergon. 9(3), 131–136 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(78)90002-9
Ahn, Y.-J., Kim, I., Hyun, S.S.: Critical in-flight and ground-service factors influencing brand prestige and relationships between brand prestige, well-being perceptions, and brand loyalty: first class passengers. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 32(sup1), S114–S138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1008666
Senn, T., Falter, M., Ruster, P., Hadwich, K.: Automated driving - creating gain or reducing pain? An empirical study of direct and mediated effects on wellbeing. In: GMFC 2018, pp. 1580–1583 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15444/GMC2018.13.08.01
Ma, L., Zhang, X., Ding, X., Wang, G.: Bike sharing and users’ subjective well-being. An empirical study in China. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 118, 14–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.040
Sauer, V., Mertens, A., Heitland, J., Nitsch, V.: Exploring the concept of passenger well-being in the context of automated driving. Int. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. 6(3), 227–248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2019.104594
Klimmt, C.: Das Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell, 1st edn. Nomos, Baden-Baden (2011)
Brunner, C.B., Ullrich, S., Jungen, P., Esch, F.-R.: Impact of symbolic design on brand evaluations. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 25(3), 307–320 (2016)
Reilhac, P., Moizard, J., Kaiser, F., Hottelart, K.: Cockpitkonzept für das teilautomatisierte Fahren. ATZ 118(3), 44–49 (2016)
Kim, J., Kim, H.-S., Kim, W., Yoon, D.: Take-over performance analysis depending on the drivers’ non-driving secondary tasks in automated vehicles. In: ICT convergence powered by smart intelligence. ICTC 2018: the 9th International Conference on ICT Convergence, Maison Glad Jeju, Jeju Island, Korea, 17–19 October 2018, pp. 1364–1366 (2018)
Radford, S.K., Bloch, P.H.: Linking innovation to design: consumer responses to visual product newness. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28(S1), 208–220 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00871.x
Homburg, C., Schwemmle, M., Kuehnl, C.: New product design: concept, measurement, and consequences. J. Mark. 79(3), 41–56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0199
Ahmadpour, N., Lindgaard, G., Robert, J.-M., Pownall, B.: The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin. Ergonomics 57(6), 801–815 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.899632
Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of Oz studies - why and how. In: Gray, W.D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 1st international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, Orlando, Florida, USA, 04–07 January 1993, pp. 193–200. ACM, New York (1993). https://doi.org/10.1145/169891.169968
Festner, M., Eicher, A., Schramm, D.: Beeinflussung der Komfort- und Sicherheitswahrnehmung beim hochautomatisierten Fahren durch fahrfremde Tätigkeit und Spurwechseldynamik. In: Uni-Das, E.V. (ed.) 11. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme und automatisiertes Fahren, Walting im Altmühltal, Germany, 29–31 March 2017, pp. 63–73 (2017)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank AUDI AG, Germany, for their contribution to this research. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of AUDI AG, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sauer, V., Mertens, A., Reiche, M., Mai, C., Heitland, J., Nitsch, V. (2020). Perception and Processing in Automated Driving – A Dual Process Application. In: Stephanidis, C., Duffy, V.G., Streitz, N., Konomi, S., Krömker, H. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Digital Human Modeling and Ergonomics, Mobility and Intelligent Environments. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12429. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59987-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59987-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59986-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59987-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)