Abstract
Pauline Hanson is Australia’s most significant far-right populist of recent times. She is arguably the nation’s most recognizable and effective political communicator and leads a far-right party of influence in a tightly balanced federal Senate chamber. However, empirical analyses of Hanson’s rhetorical style are almost non-existent. To redress that gap, this paper analyses a corpus of Hanson’s major speeches through the lens of persuasive definitions—that is, the premise that when politicians define objects, events, or ideas, they do so with a view to influencing the public’s attitudes about them. It is argued that Hanson uses four such techniques in the discursive construction of ideology: dissociation (breaking concepts into parts), reframing (placing new frames of reference around subjects), floating signifiers (making claims about contested cultural keywords), and definitions by effect (explaining concepts by reference to their negative social impacts). The ways in which these techniques may accord with far-right populists elsewhere are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 58: 2–16.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 1996a. House of Representatives Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 10 September, column 3860–3863.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 1996b. House of Representatives Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 2 December, column 7441–7443.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 1997. House of Representatives Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 20 November, column 11014–11017.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 1998. House of Representatives Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 24 March, column 1468–1469.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 2016. Senate Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 14 September, column 937–941.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 2017a. Senate Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 17 August, column 6024–6027.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 2017b. Senate Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 27 November, column 8913.
Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. 2018. Senate Parliamentary Debates, official Hansard, 10 May, column 2966–2967.
Curran, Giorel. 2004. “Mainstreaming Populist Discourse: The Race-Conscious Legacy of Neo-Populist Parties in Australia and Italy.” Patterns of Prejudice 38 (1): 37–55.
Department of the Environment and Energy. 2018. “Agenda 21—Sustainable Development.” Accessed November 6, 2018. http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/4c38f8b4-da1f-409e-8ad6-c3c6246001fd/files/agenda21.pdf.
Deutchman, Iva Ellen. 2000. “Pauline Hanson and the Rise and Fall of the Radical Right in Australia.” Patterns of Prejudice 34 (1): 49–62.
Dorling, Philip. 2017. The American Far-Right Origins of Pauline Hanson’s Views on Islam: Investigating One Nation’s Thinking. Canberra: The Australia Institute.
Frick, Karen, David Weinzimmer, and Paul Waddell. 2014. “The Politics of Sustainable Development Opposition: State Legislative Efforts to Stop the United Nation’s Agenda 21 in the United States.” Urban Studies 52 (2): 209–232.
Gibson, Rachel, Ian McAllister, and Tami Swenson. 2002. “The Politics of Race and Immigration in Australia: One Nation Voting in the 1998 Election.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (5): 823–844.
Goot, Murray. 2005. “Pauline Hanson’s One Nation: Extreme Right, Centre Party or Extreme Left?” Labour History 89: 101–119.
Hanson, Pauline. 2018a. “Pauline Back at the Wheel.” In Pauline: In Her Own Words, edited by Pauline Hanson and Tom Ravlic, 37–44. Melbourne: Wilkinson Publishing.
Hanson, Pauline. 2018b. “Address to the Reclaim Australia Rally.” In Pauline: In Her Own Words, edited by Pauline Hanson and Tom Ravlic, 45–52. Melbourne: Wilkinson Publishing.
Hanson, Pauline, and Tom Ravlic. 2018. Pauline: In Her Own Words. Melbourne: Wilkinson Publishing.
Harman, Greg. 2015. “Agenda 21: A Conspiracy Theory Puts Sustainability in the Crosshairs.” Guardian, June 25. Accessed February 4, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jun/24/agenda-21-conspiracy-theory-sustainability.
Hogan, Jackie, and Kristin Haltinner. 2015. “Floods, Invaders, and Parasites: Immigration Threat Narratives and Right-Wing Populism in the USA, UK and Australia.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 36 (5): 520–543.
Howarth, David, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2000. “Introducing discourse theory and political analysis.” In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, edited by David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, 1–23. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46: 319–345.
Jorgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
Lanham, Richard. 1991. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Marr, David. 2017. The White Queen: One Nation and the Politics of Race. Quarterly Essay 65: 1–102.
Mudde, Cas. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563.
Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pelinka, Anton. 2013. “Right-wing Populism: Concept and Typology.” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, edited by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosravNik, and Brigitte Mral, 3–22. London: Bloomsbury.
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Scalmer, Sean. 1999. “The Production of a Founding Event: The Case of Pauline Hanson’s Maiden Parliamentary Speech.” Theory and Event 3 (2).
Schiappa, Edward. 1993. “Arguing About Definitions.” Argumentation 7: 403–417.
Silva Rhetoricae. 2007. “Chronographia.” Accessed June 16, 2018. http://rhetoric.byu.edu.
Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2017. “Discourse Theory in Populism Research.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 523–534.
Walton, Douglas, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2015. “The Importance and Trickiness of Definition Strategies in Legal and Political Argumentation.” Journal of Politics and Law 8 (1): 137–148.
Wodak, Ruth. 2014. “It Would be Dangerous to View Modern European Populism as a Triumph of Style Over Substance.” The London School of Economics and Political Science: European Politics and Policy Blog, July 23. Accessed August 26, 2018. http://bit.ly/1rAYa8s.
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2017. “The ‘Establishment’, the ‘Elites’, and the ‘People’.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 551–565.
Zarefsky, David. 2004. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Power of Definition.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 607–619.
Zarefsky, David, Carol Miller‐Tutzauer, and Frank Tutzauer. 1984. “Reagan’s Safety Net for the Truly Needy: The Rhetorical Uses of Definition.” Communication Studies 35 (2): 113–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fenton-Smith, B. (2020). The (Re) Birth of Far-Right Populism in Australia: The Appeal of Pauline Hanson’s Persuasive Definitions. In: Kranert, M. (eds) Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55038-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55038-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55037-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55038-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)