Abstract
The chapter presents Laclau and Mouffe’s theory and then outlines some of the most important criticism of their discourse analysis. After a brief summary of key terms, such as hegemonic articulation and constitutive outside, the chapter positions Laclau and Mouffe within the post-Althusserian moment, arguing that they inherit certain unresolved problems from this origin. The first problem concerns the application of categories derived from the theory of ideology to the entirety of the social field, which leads to what the chapter calls ‘descriptive indeterminacy.’ The second problem concerns the suppression of the normative dimension in the theory of social subjectivity, which leads to an oscillation between neutral description and partisan intervention. In both cases, Laclau and Mouffe’s response to these criticisms is explored and evaluated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A
Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx. London/New York: Verso.
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.
Althusser, L. (1976). Essays in Self-Criticism. London: New Left Books.
Althusser, L. (1978). The Crisis of Marxism. Theoretical Review, 7, 10–21.
Althusser, L., Balibar, É., Establet, R., & Maccheray, P. (2016). Reading Capital (Complete ed.). London/New York: Verso.
B
Benveniste, É. (1971). Problems in General Linguistics. Miami: University of Miami Press.
Borch-Jakobsen, M. (1991). Lacan: The Absolute Master. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
C
Critchley, S. (1993). The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. London: Blackwell.
Critchley, S. (1999). Ethics, Politics, Subjectivity: Essays on Derrida, Levinas and Contemporary French Thought. London: Verso.
Critchley, S. (2002). Ethics, Politics and Radical Democracy: The History of a Disagreement. Culture Machine, 4, 1–6.
D
Daylight, R. (2011). What If Derrida Was Wrong About Saussure? Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
E
Elliott, G. (1987). Althusser: The Detour of Theory. London/New York: Verso.
G
Geras, N. (1972). Althusser’s Marxism: An Assessment and Account. New Left Review, 1(71), 57–86.
Godelier, M. (1977). Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
J
Jakobson, R. (1990). On Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jakobson, R., & Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.
L
Lacan, J. (1998). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. London/ New York: Norton.
Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.
Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London/New York: Verso.
Laclau, E. (1995). The Time Is Out of Joint. Diacritics, 25(2), 89–96.
Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2000a). Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (pp. 44–89). London/New York: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2000b). Structure, History and the Political. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (pp. 182–212). London/New York: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2002). Ethics, Politics and Radical Democracy: A Reply to Simon Critchley. Culture Machine, 4, 1–5.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1987). Post-Marxism Without Apologies. New Left Review, 163, 40–82.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics (3rd ed.). London/New York: Verso.
Lakatos, I. (1969). Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series, 70, 149–186.
Lakatos, I. (1978a). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction. In I. Lakatos (Ed.), Philosophical Papers, Volume I: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (pp. 102–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978b). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
M
Mouffe, C. (1979). Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (pp. 168–205). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mouffe, C. (1999). Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt (pp. 39–55). London/New York: Verso.
T
Therborn, G. (1980). The Power of Ideology and the Ideology of Power. London: New Left Books.
Thompson, E. (1978). The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Z
Zizek, S. (1999a). Carl Schmitt in the Age of Post-Politics. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt (pp. 18–37). London/New York: Verso.
Zizek, S. (1999b). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London/New York: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boucher, G. (2019). Tensions in the Post-Althusserian Project: Descriptive Indeterminacy and Normative Uncertainty. In: Marttila, T. (eds) Discourse, Culture and Organization. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94122-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94123-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)