Skip to main content

Challenges and Prospects of Emotional State Diagnosis in Command and Control Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Augmented Cognition. Theoretical and Technological Approaches (HCII 2020)

Abstract

The present investigation examines the correlations of emotional user states and performance in command and control environments. The aim is to gain insights into whether and how the integration of the emotional state into a diagnostic component of an adaptive human-machine system can take place. While positive valence is expected to be associated with high performance (Hypothesis 1), negative valence is assumed to be associated with low performance (Hypothesis 2). In a laboratory experiment, a command and control task in the domain of anti-air warfare was performed. Emotional valence was assessed with a software for recognition of emotional face expressions (Emotient FACET). To measure performance, we assessed performance decrements that occurred whenever a subtask was not accomplished in time. Data from 22 participants were used for the analysis (45% female, 17–52 years, M = 30.96, SD = 9.76). Regression analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses. Contrary to expectations, there were no correlations between emotional valence and performance at the group level. Even though empirical results failed to support the hypotheses, significant correlations between positive valence and performance were found for 36% of the subjects, 45% for negative valence and performance. These results indicate that individual models are necessary for the analysis of emotional user state. We discuss practical implications and suggest improvements to the paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. Automatica 19(6), 775–779 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parasuraman, R., Manzey, D.: Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration. Hum. Factors 52(3), 381–410 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Åkerstedt, T., Mollard, R., Samel, A., Simons, M., Spencer, M.: The role of EU FTL legislation in reducing cumulative fatigue in civil aviation. Presented at the ETSC Meeting (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 44(3), 365–375 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs, S., et al.: Anwendungsorientierte Realisierung adaptiver Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion für Sicherheitskritische Systeme (ARAMIS). Final project report (grant no. E/E4BX/HA031/CF215). Fraunhofer FKIE, Wachtberg (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eyben, F., et al.: Emotion on the road-necessity, acceptance, and feasibility of affective computing in the car. Adv. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2010(1768), 1–17 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, C.M., Jonsson, I.-M.: Automatic recognition of affective cues in the speech of car drivers to allow appropriate responses. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 1–10. Citizens Online: Considerations for Today and the Future, Canberra (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Groeger, J.A.: Understanding Driving: Applying Cognitive Psychology to a Complex Everyday Task. Taylor & Francis Ltd., Hove (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kontogiannis, T.: Stress and operator decision making in coping with emergencies. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 45(1), 75–104 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.A., Lacson, F.C.: Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. Hum. Factors 48(2), 241–256 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vassiliou, M.S., Alberts, D.S., Agre, J.R.: C2 Re-Envisioned: The Future of the Enterprise. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Littlewort, G., et al.: The computer expression recognition toolbox (CERT). In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops, pp. 298–305, (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lemay Center for Doctrine: Key considerations of command and control. Annex 3-30 - Command and Control, pp. 6–10 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vassiliou, M.S., Alberts, D.S., Agre, J.R., Alberts, D.S., Agre, J.R.: C2 Re-Envisioned: The Future of the Enterprise. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Wohl, J.G.: Force management decision requirements for air force tactical command and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 11(9), 618–639 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaillard, A.: Concentration, stress and performance. In: Hancock, P.A., Szalma, J.L. (eds.) Performance Under Stress, pp. 59–65. Ashgate Publishing, Burlington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Panganiban, A.: Effects of anxiety on change detection in a command and control task. Master of Science thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stecklov, G., Goldstein, J.: Terror attacks influence driving behavior in Israel. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 101(40), 14551–14556 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimasa, T., Jamson, S., Henson, B.: Are happy drivers safer drivers? Evidence from hazard response times and eye tracking data. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 46(1), 14–23 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wells-Parker, E., et al.: An exploratory study of the relationship between road rage and crash experience in a representative sample of US drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 34(3), 271–278 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deffenbacher, J.L., Oetting, E.R., Lynch, R.S.: Development of a driving anger scale. Psychol. Rep. 74(1), 83–91 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. iMotions: iMotions facial expressions analysis pocket guide (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. James, L., Nahl, D.: Road Rage and Aggressive Driving: Steering Clear of Highway Warfare. Prometheus Books, Amherst (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cohn, J.F., Schmidt, K., Gross, R., Ekman, P.: Individual differences in facial expression: Stability over time, relation to self-reported emotion, and ability to inform person identification. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 491–496 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hudlicka, E.: Affect-adaptive interaction in behavioral health technologies. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Copenhagen, in press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taggart, R.W., Dressler, M., Kumar, P., Khan, S., Coppola, J.F.: Determining emotions via facial expression analysis software. Behav. Res. Methods 50(4), 1446–1460 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fridkin, K.L., Gershon, S.A., Courey, J., LaPlant, K.: Gender differences in emotional reactions to the first 2016 presidential debate. Polit. Behav., 1–31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09546-9

  28. Iqbal, F.: Understanding user interaction in a video game by using eye tracking and facial expressions analysis. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finnland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi, K., Yamada, K., Nakano, T., Yamamoto, S.: Method of detecting concentration on cellular phone call from facial expression change by image processing. In: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 4, pp. 3444–3448 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cai, H., Lin, Y.: Modeling of operators’ emotion and task performance in a virtual driving environment. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69(9), 571–586 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McDuff, D., Kaliouby, R., Kassam, K. Picard, R.: Affect valence inference from facial action unit spectrograms. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops, pp. 17–24 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Russell, J.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Posner, J., Russell, J.A., Peterson, B.S.: The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Dev. Psychopathol. 17(3), 715–734 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Appelhans, B.M., Luecken, L.J.: Heart rate variability as an index of regulated emotional responding. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 10(3), 229–240 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Schmitz-Hübsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schmitz-Hübsch, A., Fuchs, S. (2020). Challenges and Prospects of Emotional State Diagnosis in Command and Control Environments. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds) Augmented Cognition. Theoretical and Technological Approaches. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12196. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50353-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50353-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50352-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50353-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics