Skip to main content

The Effect of Sensory Feedback on Time Perception of Interface Indicator from Age Difference

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12207))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1361 Accesses

Abstract

The aging of the population is an irreversible trend, and the physiological problems caused by aging make the use of mobile devices a challenge. This study started from the placebo theory of human-computer interaction and pointed out that tactile feedback could make users have a positive experience. Based on the attention door model, experiments were conducted to explore whether different types of feedback could reduce the waiting time perception of users. The experiment divided the experimental group and the control group by age, conducted three types of feedback and two tasks. Using the T-test to analyze significance, and then conducted interviews after the experiment to collect qualitative data. The results showed that in short-term tasks, there were significant differences in the types of feedback that include haptic feedback. For the elderly, the addition of haptic feedback might not reduce time perception. However, in terms of preference, the elderly generally liked the type which including haptic and visual feedback. According to the Qualitative result, haptic feedback could make the operation certainly for the elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inform. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. René, D., Gaukroger, S.: The World and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511605727

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Adar, E., Tan, D.S., Teevan, J.: Benevolent deception in human computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013). Association for Computing Machinery, Paris, pp. 1863-1872 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466246

  4. Nielsen, J.: 10 Usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group 1(1) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galitz, W.O.: The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley Publishing, Indiana (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saffer, D.: Microinteractions: Full Color Edition: Designing with Details, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, S.-F., Cheng, H.-S., Chang, C.-F., Lin, P.-Y.: A study of perception using mobile device for multi-haptic feedback. In: Yamamoto, S., Mori, H. (eds.) HIMI 2018. LNCS, vol. 10904, pp. 218–226. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92043-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Banter, B.: Touch screens and touch surfaces are enriched by haptic force-feedback. Inf. Disp. 26(3), 26–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2637-496x.2010.tb00231.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, S.-F., Chueh, Y.-S., Chang, C.-F., Lin, P.-Y., Cheng, H.-S.: A study of performance on multi-touch gesture for multi-haptic feedback. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11592, pp. 441–449. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Beecher, H.K.: The powerful placebo. JAMA 159(17), 1602–1606 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1955.02960340022006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo, M.: For exercise in New York futility, push button. New York Times (2004). https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/27/nyregion/for-exercise-in-new-york-futility-push-button.html Accessed 27 Feb 2004

  12. Langer, E.J.: The illusion of control. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32(2), 311–328 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Irani, K.B., Wallace, V.L., Jackson, J.H.: Conversational design of stochastic service systems from a graphical terminal. In: Parslow, R.D., Green, R.E. (eds.) Advanced Computer Graphics, pp. 91–101. Springer, Boston (1971) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4606-7_7

  14. Seidler, R., Stelmach, G.: Motor Control, Encyclopedia of Gerontology: Age, Aging and the Aged. Academic Press, San Diego (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, C.-F., Kuo, C.-C.: Difficulties on small-touch-screens for various ages. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 968–974. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickinson, A., Gregor, P.: Computer use has no demonstrated impact on the well-being of older adults. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64(8), 744–753 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Findlater, L., Froehlich, J.E., Fattal, K., Wobbrock, J.O., Dastyar, T.: Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 343–346. ACM, New York (2013) https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470703

  18. Chaparro, A., Rogers, M., Fernandez, J., Bohan, M., Choi, S.D., Stumpfhauser, L.: Range of motion of the wrist: implications for designing computer input devices for the elderly. Disabil. Rehabil. 22(13), 633–637 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280050138313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Silfverberg, M.: Using mobile keypads with limited visual feedback: implications to handheld and wearable devices. In: Chittaro, L. (ed.) Mobile HCI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2795, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Elliott, L.R., van Erp, J.B.F., Redden, E.S., Duistermaat, M.: Field-based validation of a tactile navigation device. IEEE Trans. Haptics 3(2), 78–87 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2010.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Heuten, W., Boll, S.: PocketNavigator: studying tactile navigation systems in-situ. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 3131–3140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208728

  22. SalInas, E.L., Rassmus-Gruhn, K., Sjosstrom, C.: Supporting presence in collaborative environments by hap-tic force feedback. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7(4), 461–467 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/365058.365086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nah, F.-H.: A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are Web users willing to wait? Behav. Inf. Technol. 23(3), 153–163 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering, 1st edn. AP Professional, Cambridge (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Droit-Volet, S., Fayolle, S.L., Gil, S.: Emotion and time perception: effects of film-induced mood. Front. Integr. Neurosci., 5(33) (2011) https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00033

  26. Zakay, D.: Experiencing time in daily life. Psychol. 25(8), 578–581 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, S.-F., Yang, Y.-T., Chang, C.-F., Lin, P.-Y., Cheng, H.-S.: A study on haptic feedback awareness of senior citizens. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2018. LNCS, vol. 10926, pp. 315–324. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis Inc., Bosa Roca (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schneider, O., et al.: Haptic experience design: what hapticians do and where they need help. Int. J. Hum-Comput. Stud. 107, 5-21 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.04.004

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the financial support from The Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan. The grant MOST 107-2221-E-006-169 & MOST 108-2221-E-006-048.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Wei Tseng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, SF., Tseng, YW., Chang, CF. (2020). The Effect of Sensory Feedback on Time Perception of Interface Indicator from Age Difference. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12207. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50251-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50252-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics