Abstract
Can effects of social influence be elicited in virtual contexts, and if so, under which conditions can they be observed? Answering these questions has theoretical merit, as the answers can help broaden our understanding of the interaction mechanisms described by social psychology. The increasing popularity of immersive media in training applications, however, has made these questions of practical significance. Virtual reality (VR), in particular, is a weapon of choice in designing training and education simulations, as it can be used to generate highly realistic characters and environments. As a consequence, it is key to understand under which circumstances virtual ‘others’ can facilitate or impede performance and – especially – learning. In this study, we investigated the impact of virtual onlookers on an adapted Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task that was presented in VR. In each trial, participants responded to a series of spherical stimuli by tapping them with handheld controllers when they lit up. Depending on the experiment block, the sequence order was either the permutation of a fixed order (and therefore predictable given the first stimulus), or fully random (and therefore unpredictable). Participants were divided into three groups (audience variable), depending on the environment in which the task was set: a group without onlookers (none condition), a group with a computer-generated audience (CGI condition), and a group being watched by a prerecorded audience (filmed condition). Results showed that the presence of a virtual audience can hamper both overall performance and learning, particularly when the audience appears more realistic. This study further reinforces the notion that the effects of social influence transcend the physical presence of others, but rather extend to virtual audiences.
W. Durnez, K. Bombeke and J. Joundi–These authors contributed equally to this work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baldwin, N., Branyon, J., Sethumadhavan, A., Pak, R.: In search of virtual social facilitation effects. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 59(1), 90–94 (2015)
Bond, C.F., Titus, L.J.: Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychol. Bull. 94(2), 265 (1983)
De Paepe, A.L., Crombez, G., Legrain, V.: Remapping nociceptive stimuli into a peripersonal reference frame is spatially locked to the stimulated limb. Neuropsychologia 101(May), 121–131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.015
Durnez, W., Van Damme, S.: Trying to fix a painful problem: the impact of pain control attempts on the attentional prioritization of a threatened body location. J. Pain 16(2), 135–143 (2015)
Hall, B., Henningsen, D.D.: Social facilitation and human-computer interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(6), 2965–2971 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.003
Hayes, A.L., Ulinski, A.C., Hodges, L.F.: That Avatar is looking at me! social inhibition in virtual worlds. In: Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (eds.) IVA 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6356, pp. 454–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_49
Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6(2), 65–70 (1979)
Hoyt, C.L., Blascovich, J., Swinth, K.R.: Social inhibition in immersive virtual environments. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 12(2), 183–195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603321640932
Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., Kageki, N.: The uncanny valley. IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag. 19(2), 98–100 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
Park, S., Catrambone, R.: Social facilitation effects of virtual humans. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 49(6), 1054–1060 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007x249910
Rickenberg, R., Reeves, B.: The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 2000, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332406
Sanders, G.S.: Driven by distraction : an integrative review of social facilitation theory and research. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 17(3), 227–251 (1981)
Strauss, B.: Social facilitation in motor tasks: a review of research and theory. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 3(3), 237–256 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1469-0292(01)00019-x
Verbruggen, F., Aron, A.R.: Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(31), 13966–13971 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001957107/-/DCSupplemental.www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1001957107, http://www.pnas.org/content/107/31/13966.short
Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149(3681), 269–274 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511628214
Zajonc, R.B.: Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. (1980). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151
Zanbaka, C.A., Ulinski, A.C., Goolkasian, P., Hodges, L.F.: Effects of virtual human presence on task performance. In: Proceedings Artificial Reality and Telexistence, pp. 174–181 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Durnez, W. et al. (2020). Fake People, Real Effects. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Design and Interaction. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12190. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49695-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49695-1_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49694-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49695-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)