Abstract
In the operation of nuclear power plant and especially when the digital human-machine interactive system is adopted, the cognitive decision and acts of operator play more and more important role in determine the plant’s safe operation. In order to analysis the risk mechanism of human error and control the risk transmission, this study proposes a framework to conceptually model the performance shaping factor (PSF) interaction that involve the interactions of organizational, operator and technical system factors. Using the method of engineering psychology, the operator workload is adopted to be the central risk indicator and multiple levels of resource channel are considered in a quantitative manner. To reflect the dependency between PSFs, the system dynamics based modeling approach is adopted to identify the interactions between PSFs and the overall risk boundary. It helps to establish a dynamic model for human reliability assessment and human-machine interface design. Although this paper is focused on the method application on nuclear field, it has the potential to be extended to other industrial sectors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Griffith, C.D., Mahadevan, S.: Inclusion of fatigue effects in human reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96(11), 1437–1447 (2011)
Hollnagel, E.: Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford (1998)
Spurgin, A.J.: Human Reliability Assessment Theory and Practice. CRC Press, London (2010)
Singh, S., Majumdar, A., Kyriakidis, M.: Incorporating human reliability analysis to enhance maintenance audits: the case of Rail Bogie maintenance. Int. J. Progn. Health Manage. 8(1), 1–10 (2018)
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Rafferty, L.A., Walker, G.H., Baber, C.: Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham (2013)
Marshall, A., et al.: Development of the human error template–a new methodology for assessing design induced errors on aircraft flight decks
Kletz, T.A.: HAZOP and HAZAN: notes on the identification and assessment of hazards. J. Hazard. Mater. 8(4), 385–386 (1984)
Swann, C.D., Preston, M.L.: Twenty-five years of HAZOPs. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 8(6), 349–353 (1995)
Hollnagel, E.: Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM). Elsevier, Oxford (1998)
Shappell, S.A., Wiegmann, D.A.: A human error approach to accident investigation: the taxonomy of unsafe operations. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 7(4), 269–291 (1997)
Shappell, S.A., Wiegmann, D.A.: The human factors analysis and classification system-HFACS. Am. Libr. 1(1), 20–46 (2000)
Liu, P., Qiu, Y.P., Hu, J.T., Tong, J.J., Zhao, J., Li, Z.Z.: Expert judgments for performance shaping factors’ multiplier design in human reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. (2020, in press)
Dulac, N., Owens, B., Leveson, N.G.: Demonstration of a new dynamic approach to risk analysis for nasa’s constellation program. MIT CSRL Final report to the NASA ESMD Associate Administrator (2007)
Bouloiz, H., Garbolino, E., Tkiouat, M., Guarnieri, F.: A system dynamics model of behavioral analysis of safety conditions in a chemical storage unit. Saf. Sci. 58(1), 32–40 (2013)
Song, B., et al.: A multidimensional workload assessment method for power grid dispatcher. In: Harris, D. (ed.) EPCE 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10906, pp. 55–68. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91122-9_5
Wang, Z., Fu, S.: Evaluation of a strapless heart rate monitor during simulated flight tasks. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13(3), 185–192 (2016)
Gertman, D.I., Blackman, H., Marble, J., Byers, J., Smith, C.: The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6883 (2005)
Ryu, K., Myung, R.: Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35(11), 991–1009 (2005)
Teng, X., et al.: The identification of human errors in the power dispatching based on the TRACEr method. In: Harris, D. (ed.) EPCE 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10906, pp. 80–89. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91122-9_7
Acknowledgments
This research was sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 61803263) and the Startup Fund for Youngman Research at SJTU of China (SFYR at SJTU).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, G. et al. (2020). Multidimensional Risk Dynamics Modeling on Operator Errors of Nuclear Power Plant. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49182-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49183-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)