Abstract
One of the biggest challenges in Group Therapy is to track each patient’s experience and feeling without him/her noticing. Altering the familiarity of the mutual support group routine may weaken the therapeutic efficacy of the intervention. It must be avoided the “Elephant in the room’s Effect”: everyone knows is being observed and acts consequently. Therapists struggle and spend years of training on developing the skills they need to “silently” monitor all patients at the same time. From our perspective, we wonder whether and how technology can be a support for therapists in such a challenging task. More precisely, how to provide them with a non-invasive support tool that is invisible to the end-users, but at the same time ever-present for the caregivers. Basically, we asked ourselves: Can we deceive “the Elephant in the room”? Therapists may benefit from automatic measures indicating how the participants perceive the session and gathering the participants’ feedback is one path to develop valuable mutual support interventions. Our work describes the design, development and assessment of a non-invasive tool to monitor a Group Session.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pfeiffer, P.N., Heisler, M., Piette, J.D., Rogers, M.A.M., Valenstein, M.: Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 33(1), 29–36 (2011)
Stead, L.F., Carroll, A.J., Lancaster, T.: Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3) (2017). Article no. CD001007. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub3
Cameron, L.D., Booth, R.J., Schlatter, M., Ziginskas, D., Harman, J.E.: Changes in emotion regulation and psychological adjustment following use of a group psychosocial support program for women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol.: J. Psychol. Soc. Behav. Dimensions Cancer 16(3), 171–180 (2007)
Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Pessin, H., Applebaum, A., Kulikowski, J., Lichtenthal, W.G.: Meaning-centered group psychotherapy: an effective intervention for improving psychological well-being in patients with advanced cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 33(7), 749 (2015)
Seebohm, P., Chaudhary, S., Boyce, M., Elkan, R., Avis, M., Munn-Giddings, C.: The contribution of self-help/mutual aid groups to mental well-being. Health Soc. Care Community 21(4), 391–401 (2013)
Ruini, C., Belaise, C., Brombin, C., Caffo, E., Fava, G.A.: Well-being therapy in school settings: a pilot study. Psychother. Psychosom. 75(6), 331–336 (2006)
Friedman, E.M., Ruini, C., Foy, R., Jaros, L., Sampson, H., Ryff, C.D.: Lighten UP! A community-based group intervention to promote psychological well-being in older adults. Aging Ment. Health 21(2), 199–205 (2017)
Hawton, K.E., Salkovskis, P.M., Kirk, J.E., Clark, D.M.: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychiatric Problems: A Practical Guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)
Stott, J., Charlesworth, G., Scior, K.: Measures of readiness for cognitive behavioural therapy in people with intellectual disability: a systematic review. Res. Dev. Disabil. 60(2017), 37–51 (2017)
McConachie, H., et al.: Group therapy for anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 18(6), 723–732 (2014)
Willets, L., Mooney, P., Blagden, N.: Social climate in learning disability services. J. Intellect. Disabil. Offending Behav. 5(1), 24–37 (2014)
Webster, J.J., Kit, C.: Tokenization as the initial phase in NLP. In: COLING 1992: The 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 4 (1992)
Plisson, J., Lavrac, N., Mladenic, D., et al.: A rule based approach to word lemmatization. In: Proceedings of IS-2004, pp. 83–86 (2004)
Màrquez, L., Rodríguez, H.: Part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 25–36. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026668
Straková, J., Straka, M., Hajič, J.: Open-source tools for morphology, lemmatization, POS tagging and named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 13–18 (2014)
Loper, E., Bird, S.: NLTK: the natural language toolkit. arXiv preprint arXiv:cs/0205028 (2002)
Pinto, A., Gonçalo Oliveira, H., Oliveira Alves, A.: Comparing the performance of different NLP toolkits in formal and social media text. In: 5th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2016). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2016)
Apple: Apple Natural Language (2019). https://developer.apple.com/documentation/naturallanguage. Accessed Sept 2019
IBM 2019: IBM Natural Language Understanding (2019). https://www.ibm.com/watson/services/natural-language-understanding/. Accessed Sept 2019
Amazon: Amazon Comprehend (2019). https://aws.amazon.com/comprehend/. Accessed Sept 2019
Google: Google Natural Language (2019). https://cloud.google.com/natural-language/?hl=en. Accessed Sept 2019
Liu, F., Liu, F., Liu, Y.: A supervised framework for keyword extraction from meeting transcripts. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 19(3), 538–548 (2010)
Galley, M.: Automatic summarization of conversational multi-party speech (2006)
Ziegler, J., Jerroudi, Z.E., Böhm, K.: Generating semantic contexts from spoken conversation in meetings. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 290–292. ACM (2005)
El-Assady, M., Sevastjanova, R., Gipp, B., Keim, D., Collins, C.: NEREx: named-entity relationship exploration in multi-party conversations. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 36, pp. 213–225. Wiley Online Library (2017)
Li, J., Liao, M., Gao, W., He, Y., Wong, K.-F.: Topic extraction from microblog posts using conversation structures. In: ACL (1). World Scientific (2016)
de Bayser, M.G., Guerra, M.A., Cavalin, P.R., Pinhanez, C.S.: Specifying and implementing multi-party conversation rules with finite-state-automata. In: AAAI Workshops (2018)
Vázquez, M., Carter, E.J., McDorman, B., Forlizzi, J., Steinfeld, A., Hudson, S.E.: Towards robot autonomy in group conversations: understanding the effects of body orientation and gaze. In: 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 42–52 (2017)
Sapru, A., Bourlard, H.: Detecting speaker roles and topic changes in multiparty conversations using latent topic models. In: Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (2014)
Lucas-Carrasco, R., Salvador-Carulla, L.: Life satisfaction in persons with intellectual disabilities. Res. Dev. Disabil. 33(4), 1103–1109 (2012)
Evans, C., et al.: Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br. J. Psychiatry 180(1), 51–60 (2002)
Margison, F., et al.: CORE: clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. J. Ment. Health 9(3), 247–255 (2000)
Majani, G., et al.: A new instrument in quality-of-life assessment: the satisfaction profile (SAT-P). Int. J. Ment. Health 28(3), 77–82 (1999)
Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A., Norman, K.L.: Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 213–218. ACM (1988)
Diener, E.: Assessing subjective well-being: progress and opportunities. Soc. Indic. Res. 31(2), 103–157 (1994)
Tobia, V., Greco, A., Steca, P., Marzocchi, G.M.: Children’s wellbeing at school: a multi-dimensional and multi-informant approach. J. Happiness Stud. 20(3), 841–861 (2019)
Shneiderman, B., Norman, K.: Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS), Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading (1992)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by “Psychotherapy School AREA G” and “Fraternità e Amicizia No-profit”. We thank our consultant, Mrs. Barbara Moro from AREA G. who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research. We would also like to show our gratitude to Miss Fiorella Gillino, Mr Antonio Montinaro, Miss Federica Corbella and Miss Emily Luciani and all AREA G. therapists and students for sharing their pearls of wisdom with us during the course of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Beccaluva, E. et al. (2020). Deception of the “Elephant in the Room”: Invisible Auditing Multi-party Conversations to Support Caregivers in Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapies. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Human Values and Quality of Life. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12183. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49065-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49065-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49064-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49065-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)