Skip to main content

Addressing the Pre/Post-university Pedagogy of Entrepreneurship Coherent with Learning Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship Education

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Entrepreneurship education has been initiated in higher education, especially Business Schools, as part of the curriculum but it is currently expanding to both pre- and post-university settings. It also encounters a split from academic environments to informal ones. At the crossroads of materializing educational needs in modern socioeconomic environments, this chapter aims to compare entrepreneurial teaching paradigms at different levels of the learner’s lifecycle. Once learning theories are important in supporting educators to precisely develop the pedagogy, compatibility between different theories and different levels of education underpins the systematic provision of entrepreneurial programmes across the learner’s lifecycle with consistent outcomes and evaluations. Drawing upon Illeris’s classification, this chapter addresses a selection of relevant learning theories to entrepreneurship: Dewey’s learning-by-doing, Kolb’s experiential learning, Lave and Wenger’s communities of practice, Engeström’s expansive learning and Mezirow’s transformative learning. From a lifelong learning perspective, the chapter discusses which educational theories are better suited to the school level where the entrepreneurial programmes are implemented. Thus, the chapter contributes to the pedagogical perspective of entrepreneurship, for which research has been limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The present study confronts EE throughout the learner lifecycle and thus, it does not consider the learning areas of organizational learning or action learning (cf. Marsick and O’Neil 1999).

  2. 2.

    Elkjaer (2018, p. 75) stresses that “experience is a series of connected situations (organic circles) and even if all situations are connected to other situations, every situation has its own unique character”.

  3. 3.

    A concept that will be also used in the ‘transformative learning’ section.

  4. 4.

    Elkjaer (2018, p. 70) refers to experience as aknowledge-affair’.

  5. 5.

    As Elkjaer (2018, p. 73) explains reproducing the 1896 critique of Dewey on the reflex arc, Kolb’s theory is more aligned with the ‘orthodox’ concept of experience (Table 5.1, p. 76).

References

  • Aadland T, Aaboen L (2018) Systematising higher education: a typology of entrepreneurship education. In: Hytti U, Blackburn R, Laveren E (eds) Entrepreneurship, innovation and education. Frontiers in European Entrepreneurship Research. Edward Elgar Publ., Cheltenham UK, pp 103–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacigalupo M, Kampylis P, Punie Y, Brande GVD (2016) EntreComp: the entrepreneurship competence framework. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/entrecomp-entrepreneurship-competence-framework. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm Sci Q 50(3):329–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D (1996) Promoting reflection in learning: a model. Bound Adult Learn 1:32–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave WD, Hofer CW (1992) Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepr Theory Pract 16(2):13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope J (2003) Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection: discontinuous events as triggers for ‘higher-level’ learning. Manage Learn 34(4):429–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope J (2005) Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepr Theory Pract 29(4):373–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope J (2011) Entrepreneurial learning from failure: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Bus Ventur 26(6):604–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope J, Watts G (2000) Learning by doing–an exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. Int J Entrepr Behav Res 6(3):104–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett AC (2005) Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepr Theory Pract 29(4):473–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett AC (2007) Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. J Bus Ventur 22(1):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton P, Wright B (2008) The transformative educator as learning companion. J Transf Educ 6(1):33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakins D, Freel M (1998) Entrepreneurial learning and the growth process in SMEs. Learn Organ 5(3):144–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1923) Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimov D (2007) From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: the importance of person–situation learning match. Entrepr Theory Pract 31(4):561–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer B (2018) Pragmatism: learning as creative imagination. In: Illeris K (ed) Contemporary theories of learning. Learning theorists … in their own words, Routledge, Abingdon UK, pp 66–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (1999) Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In: Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamäki R-L (eds) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 377–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (2015) Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y, Sannino A (2010) Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educ Res Rev 5(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y, Sannino A (2012) Whatever happened to process theory of learning? Learn, Cult Soc Interact 1:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Entrepreneurship 2020 action plan: Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/promoting-entrepreneurship/action-plan_en. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • European Commission (2014) Entrepreneurship education: a guide for educators. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/7465/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • European Commission, EACEA, Eurydice (2016) Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe. Eurydice report. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/entrepreneurship-education-school-europe_en. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • European Commission (2019) Key competences for lifelong learning. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • Fayolle A (2013) Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepr Reg Dev 25(7–8):692–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellnhofer K (2019) Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: a bibliometric mapping and visualization. Educ Res Rev 27:28–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiet JO (2001a) The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 16(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiet JO (2001b) The pedagogical side of entrepreneurship theory. J Bus Ventur 16(2):101–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmell RM, Boland RJ, Kolb DA (2012) The socio–cognitive dynamics of entrepreneurial ideation. Entrepr Theory Pract 36(5):1053–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb A (2005) The future of entrepreneurship education – Determining the basis for coherent policy and practice. In: Kyrö P, Carrier C (eds) The dynamics of learning entrepreneurship in a cross-cultural university context, vol 2. University of Tampere, Research Center for Vocational and Professional Education, pp 44–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon PD (2005) Philosophies of enterprise and entrepreneurship education and challenges for higher education in the UK. Int J Entrepr Innov 6(2):105–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägg G, Kurczewska A (2016) Connecting the dots: a discussion on key concepts in contemporary entrepreneurship education. Educ + Train 58(7/8):700–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägg G, Gabrielsson J (2019) A systematic literature review of the evolution of pedagogy in entrepreneurial education research. Int J Entrepr Behav Res. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägg G, Kurczewska A (2019) Toward a learning philosophy based on experience in entrepreneurship education. Entrepr Educ Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F2515127419840607

  • Heinonen J, Poikkijoki SA (2006) An entrepreneurial-directed approach to entrepreneurship education: mission impossible? J Manage Dev 25(1):80–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig B (2004) Entrepreneurship education: toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Acad Manage Learn Educ 3(3):258–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytti U (2008) Enterprise education in different cultural settings and at different school levels. In: Fayolle A (ed) The dynamics between entrepreneurship, environment and education. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK, pp 131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Illeris K (2018) Contemporary theories of learning: learning theorists … in their own words. Routledge, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson B (2016) Limits to and prospects of entrepreneurship education in the academic context. Entrepr Reg Dev 28(5/6):403–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris A (2011) Radical innovation versus transformative learning: a Kuhnian reading. Leading issues for innovation research, vol 1. Academic Publishing International, Reading, UK, pp 19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris A (2015) Entrepreneurship pedagogies in lifelong learning: emergence of criticality? Learn, Cult Soc Interact 6:87–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris A (2017a) Constructivist entrepreneurial teaching: The TeleCC online approach in Greece. In: Jones P, Maas G, Pittaway L (eds) Contemporary issues in entrepreneurship research, vol 7. Emerald, Bingley, UK, pp 235–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris A (2017b) Entrepreneurial opportunity perception: Analyzing the effect of the learning style. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Peloponnese, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris A, Georgiadis P (2016) Analysing entrepreneurship education: a bibliometric survey pattern. J Glob Entrepr Res 6(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-016-0046-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris A, Dermatis Ζ, Liargovas P (2016) Educating potential entrepreneurs under the perspective of Europe 2020 plan. Bus Entrepr J 5(1):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris A, Liargovas P (2020) On the about/for/through framework of entrepreneurship education: a critical analysis. Entrepr Educ Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420916740

  • Katz JA (2003) The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. J Bus Ventur 18(2):283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppinen A, Juho A (2012) Internationalisation of SMEs from the perspective of social learning theory. J Int Entrepr 10(3):200–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(2):193–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger NF (2007) What lies beneath? the experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking. Entrepr Theory Pract 31(1):123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko DF (2005) The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrepr Theory Pract 29(5):577–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrö P (2006) Entrepreneurship education and finnish society. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paula_Kyroe/publication/24137728_Entrepreneurship_Education_and_Finnish_Society/links/00b7d5343b20aab43b000000.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • Kyrö P (2015) The conceptual contribution of education to research on entrepreneurship education. Entrepr Reg Dev 27(9/10):599–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackéus M (2015) Entrepreneurship in education-what, why, when, how. Background paper for OECD-LEED. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/BGP_Entrepreneurship-in-Education.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • Lackéus M (2017) Does entrepreneurial education trigger more or less neoliberalism in education? Educ + Train 59(6):635–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Laros A (2017) Disorienting dilemmas as a catalyst for transformative learning. In: Laros A, Fuhr T, Taylor EW (eds) Transformative learning meets bildung. SensePublishers, Rotterdam, International Issues in adult Education, pp 85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J (2018). The practice of learning. In: Illeris K (ed) Contemporary theories of learning. Learning theorists … in their own words. Routledge, Abingdon UK, pp 200–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre V, Radu Lefebvre M, Simon E (2015) Formal entrepreneurial networks as communities of practice: a longitudinal case study. Entrepr Reg Dev 27(7–8):500–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindster Norberg EL (2016) John Dewey and entrepreneurship in school: a Swedish case. J Educ Train 3(1):139–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark E, Tayar M, Qin K, Bilsland C (2019) Does reflection help students to develop entrepreneurial capabilities? J Small Bus Manage 57(3):1157–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh I (2017) Entrepreneurial development and the different aspects of reflection. The Int J Manage Educ 15(1):26–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainela T, Puhakka V, Servais P (2015) Boundary crossing for international opportunities. J Int Entrepr 13(3):173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainela T, Puhakka V, Sipola S (2018) International entrepreneurship beyond individuals and firms: On the systemic nature of international opportunities. J Bus Ventur 33(4):534–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick VJ, O’Neil J (1999) The many faces of action learning. Manage Learn 30(2):159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow J (1978) Perspective transformation. Adult Education 28:100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow J (1981) A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Educ 32(1):3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow J (1990) Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow J (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow J (2018) Transformative learning theory. In: Illeris K (ed) Contemporary theories of learning. Learning theorists … in their own words. Routledge, Abingdon UK, pp 114–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Minniti M, Bygrave W (2001) A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepr Theory Pract 25(3):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Morselli D (2017) The boundary crossing workshops for enterprise education. In: Jones P, Maas G, Pittaway L (eds) Contemporary issues in entrepreneurship research, vol 7. Emerald, Bingley, UK, pp 277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Morselli D (2019) The change laboratory for teacher training in entrepreneurship Education. A new Skills Agenda for Europe, Springer, Cham, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwasalwiba SE (2010) Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Educ + Train 52(1):20–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabi G, Liñán F, Fayolle A, Krueger N, Walmsley A (2017) The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: a systematic review and research agenda. Acad Manage Learn Educ 16(2):277–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Neck HM, Corbett AC (2018) The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepr Educ Pedagogy 1(1):8–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen L, Hytti U (2016) Commitment to an entrepreneurship training programme for self-employed entrepreneurs, and learning from participation. Educ + Train 58(7/8):715–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohl AM (2015) Typical phases of transformative learning: A practice-based model. Adult Educ Q 65(1):35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien E, Hamburg I (2019) A critical review of learning approaches for entrepreneurship education in a contemporary society. Eur J Educ 54(4):525–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord J (2012) John Dewey and experiential learning: developing the theory of youth work. Youth & Policy 108(1):55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Oslo Agenda (2006) Oslo agenda for entrepreneurship education in Europe, European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/8968/attachments/1/translations. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • Pepin M (2012) Enterprise education: a Deweyan perspective. Educ + Train 54(8/9):801–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin M (2018) Learning to be enterprising in school through an inquiry-based pedagogy. Ind High Educ 32(6):418–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperopoulos P, Dimov D (2015) Burst bubbles or build steam? Entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. J Small Bus Manage 53(4):970–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway L, Cope J (2007) Simulating entrepreneurial learning integrating experiential and collaborative approaches to learning. Manage Learn 38(2):211–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis D (2005) The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework. Entrepr Theory Pract 29(4):399–424

    Google Scholar 

  • QAA (2018) Enterprise and entrepreneurship education: guidance for UK Higher Education Providers. Quality Assurance Agency. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaas/enhancement-and-development/enterprise-and-entrpreneurship-education-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=15f1f981_8. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • Rae D (2010) Universities and enterprise education: responding to the challenges of the new era. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 17(4):591–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae D (2017) Entrepreneurial learning: peripherality and connectedness. Int J Entrepr Behav Res 23(3):486–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae D, Carswell M (2000) Using a life-story approach in researching entrepreneurial learning: the development of a conceptual model and its implications in the design of learning experiences. Educ + Train 42(4/5):220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikou N, Karalis T (2020) Seeking the traces of Dewey’s thought in Mezirow’s work. In: Kokkos a and associates (ed) Expanding transformation theory: affinities between Jack Mezirow and emancipatory educationalists. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138489226-1

  • Rasmussen A, Nybye N (2013) Entrepreneurship education: progression model. http://www.ffe-ye.dk/media/785762/progression-model-en.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2020

  • Rasmussen EA, Sørheim R (2006) Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation 26(2):185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S, Neergaard H, Tanggaard L, Krueger NF (2016) New horizons in entrepreneurship education: from teacher-led to student-centered learning. Educ + Train 58(7/8):661–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manage Rev 26(2):243–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard A (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educ Res 27(2):4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane SA (2008) The illusions of entrepreneurship: the costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. Yale University Press New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon G (2007) An examination of entrepreneurship education in the United States. J Small Bus Enterpr Dev 14(2):168–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson OH, Lundqvist M, Middleton KW (2017) Transformative, transactional and transmissive modes of teaching in action-based entrepreneurial education. 3E ECSB conference. Cork, Ireland, pp 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Taatila V (2010) Pragmatism as a philosophy of education for entrepreneurship. In: Neuvonen-Rauhala, M. (ed.) Innovation and entrepreneurship in universities: the proceedings of the 3rd international FINPIN 2010 conference. Joensuu, Finland, pp 52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL, Chugh H (2014) Entrepreneurial learning: Past research and future challenges. Int J Manage Rev 16(1):24–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (2018). A social theory of learning. In: Illeris K (ed) Contemporary theories of learning. Learning theorists … in their own words. Routledge, Abingdon UK, pp 209–218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandros Kakouris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kakouris, A., Morselli, D. (2020). Addressing the Pre/Post-university Pedagogy of Entrepreneurship Coherent with Learning Theories. In: Sawang, S. (eds) Entrepreneurship Education. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48802-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48802-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48801-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48802-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics