Abstract
This chapter presents a qualitative comparison of initiatives from four English-speaking countries (Canada, England, New Zealand, United States) that outline the components of teacher content knowledge in teaching reading, including bottom-up skills related to reading acquisition at the word level (i.e., phonemic awareness and alphabetic principle/phonics generalizations) and top-down holistic processes (i.e., comprehension). The chapter authors contend that an understanding of the structure of the language is essential to delivering the explicit and systematic literacy instruction that is needed especially for students at-risk for reading difficulties. The authors developed, validated, and administered a knowledge survey of basic language constructs to compare teacher candidates’ performance from the four different countries. Findings show that teacher candidates from all four countries and in general lack knowledge of certain basic language constructs needed to teach early reading skills. Suggestions regarding how to improve teacher preparation to teach reading in English language arts are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly,26, 49–66.
Binks-Cantrell, E., Joshi, R. M., & Washburn, E. K. (2012). Validation of an instrument for assessing teacher knowledge of basic language constructs of literacy. Annals of Dyslexia,62, 153–171.
Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia,51, 97–120.
Brady, S., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success- Foundations for teacher preparation. A position paper of the International Dyslexia Association, Baltimore, MD.
Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network (CLLRN). (2009). National strategy for early literacy: A summary report. London, ON: CLLRN.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit vs. implicit instruction in phonological awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,50, 429–444.
Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia,54, 139–167.
Department of Education. (1985). Reading in the junior classroom. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). The national literacy strategy: Framework for teaching. London: Department for Education and Employment.
Ehri, L. C. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In J. Downing & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119–147). New York, NY: Springer.
Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Purdie, N. (2005). Teachers’ attitude to and knowledge of metalinguistics in the process of learning to read. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,33, 65–75.
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 37–55.
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). The case for early reading interventions. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243–264). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (1979). Learning to read is natural. In L. B. Resnik & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education,7, 6–10.
Griffith, P. L., & Olson, M. W. (1992). Phonemic awareness helps beginning readers break the code. The Reading Teacher,45, 516–523.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2016). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Joshi, R. M., Binks, E. S., Hougen, M., Dean, E. O., Graham, L., & Smith, D. (2009). The role of teacher education programs in preparing teachers for implementing evidence-based reading practices. In S. Rosenfield & V. Berninger (Eds.), Handbook on implementing evidence based academic interventions (pp. 605–625). Oxford University Press.
Literacy Taskforce. (1999). Report of the literacy taskforce to the minister of education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. P. (1988). Effectiveness of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly,23, 263–284.
Mather, N., Bos, C., & Babur, N. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy education. Journal of Learning Disabilities,34, 472–482.
McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,14, 215–226.
McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., … Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69-86.
McCutchen, D., Harry, D. R., Cunningham, A. E., Cox, S., Sidman, S., & Covill, A. E. (2002). Reading teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature and English phonology. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 207–225.
Ministry of Education. (1996). The Learner as a reader: Developing reading programmes. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (1999). Literacy experts group report to the secretary for education. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2010). Literacy learning progressions: Meeting the reading and writing demands of the curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia,44, 81–102.
Moats, L. C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of “balanced” reading instruction. New York: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
Moats, L. C. (2004). Science, language, and imagination in the professional development of reading teachers. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 269–288). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia,53, 23–45.
Moats, L. C., & Lyon, G. R. (1996). Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics in Language Disorders,16, 73–86.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (1990). The nation’s report card: Reading 1994. Washington: National Center for Educational Statistics.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
New Zealand House of Representatives. (2001). Let’s all read: Report of the Education and Science Select Committee into the teaching of reading in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
O’Connor, R. (1999). Teachers learning ladders to literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,14, 203–214.
Ofsted. (2008). Rising to the challenge: A review of the Teach First initial teacher training programme. London: Alexandra House.
Patel, S. (2010). Reading at risk: Why effective literacy practice is not effective. Waikato Journal of Education,15(3), 51–68.
Rose, J. (2006). Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading: Final Report (The Rose Review). London: Department for Education and Skills (DfES).
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia,53, 72–103.
Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2004). Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Annals of Dyslexia,54, 332–364.
Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular & instructional decisions. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Torgesen, J. K. (1997). The prevention and remediation of reading disabilities: Evaluating what we know from research. Journal of Academic Language Therapy,1, 11–47.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E., Small, S., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2004). Why the reading achievement gap in New Zealand won’t go away: Evidence from the PIRLS 2001 International Study of Reading Achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies,39, 127–145.
Walsh, K., Glaser, D., & Wilcox, D. D. (2006). What education schools aren’t teaching about reading and what elementary teachers aren’t learning. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ).
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Sandra Martin-Chang (Concordia University) and Alison Arrow (Massey University) for their assistance in the collection of datafrom Canadaand New Zealand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E.K., Malatesha Joshi, R. (2020). Do Teacher Candidates in English-Speaking Countries Understand the Structure of the English Language?. In: Gallagher, T.L., Ciampa, K. (eds) Teaching Literacy in the Twenty-First Century Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47821-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47821-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47820-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47821-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)