Skip to main content

Do Teacher Candidates in English-Speaking Countries Understand the Structure of the English Language?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching Literacy in the Twenty-First Century Classroom

Abstract

This chapter presents a qualitative comparison of initiatives from four English-speaking countries (Canada, England, New Zealand, United States) that outline the components of teacher content knowledge in teaching reading, including bottom-up skills related to reading acquisition at the word level (i.e., phonemic awareness and alphabetic principle/phonics generalizations) and top-down holistic processes (i.e., comprehension). The chapter authors contend that an understanding of the structure of the language is essential to delivering the explicit and systematic literacy instruction that is needed especially for students at-risk for reading difficulties. The authors developed, validated, and administered a knowledge survey of basic language constructs to compare teacher candidates’ performance from the four different countries. Findings show that teacher candidates from all four countries and in general lack knowledge of certain basic language constructs needed to teach early reading skills. Suggestions regarding how to improve teacher preparation to teach reading in English language arts are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly,26, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binks-Cantrell, E., Joshi, R. M., & Washburn, E. K. (2012). Validation of an instrument for assessing teacher knowledge of basic language constructs of literacy. Annals of Dyslexia,62, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia,51, 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success- Foundations for teacher preparation. A position paper of the International Dyslexia Association, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network (CLLRN). (2009). National strategy for early literacy: A summary report. London, ON: CLLRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit vs. implicit instruction in phonological awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,50, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia,54, 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (1985). Reading in the junior classroom. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). The national literacy strategy: Framework for teaching. London: Department for Education and Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In J. Downing & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119–147). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Purdie, N. (2005). Teachers’ attitude to and knowledge of metalinguistics in the process of learning to read. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,33, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). The case for early reading interventions. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243–264). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (1979). Learning to read is natural. In L. B. Resnik & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education,7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, P. L., & Olson, M. W. (1992). Phonemic awareness helps beginning readers break the code. The Reading Teacher,45, 516–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2016). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M., Binks, E. S., Hougen, M., Dean, E. O., Graham, L., & Smith, D. (2009). The role of teacher education programs in preparing teachers for implementing evidence-based reading practices. In S. Rosenfield & V. Berninger (Eds.), Handbook on implementing evidence based academic interventions (pp. 605–625). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Literacy Taskforce. (1999). Report of the literacy taskforce to the minister of education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. P. (1988). Effectiveness of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly,23, 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., Bos, C., & Babur, N. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy education. Journal of Learning Disabilities,34, 472–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,14, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., … Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Harry, D. R., Cunningham, A. E., Cox, S., Sidman, S., & Covill, A. E. (2002). Reading teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature and English phonology. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1996). The Learner as a reader: Developing reading programmes. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1999). Literacy experts group report to the secretary for education. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2010). Literacy learning progressions: Meeting the reading and writing demands of the curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia,44, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of “balanced” reading instruction. New York: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (2004). Science, language, and imagination in the professional development of reading teachers. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 269–288). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia,53, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C., & Lyon, G. R. (1996). Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics in Language Disorders,16, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (1990). The nation’s report card: Reading 1994. Washington: National Center for Educational Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand House of Representatives. (2001). Let’s all read: Report of the Education and Science Select Committee into the teaching of reading in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. (1999). Teachers learning ladders to literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,14, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2008). Rising to the challenge: A review of the Teach First initial teacher training programme. London: Alexandra House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S. (2010). Reading at risk: Why effective literacy practice is not effective. Waikato Journal of Education,15(3), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2006). Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading: Final Report (The Rose Review). London: Department for Education and Skills (DfES).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia,53, 72–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2004). Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Annals of Dyslexia,54, 332–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular & instructional decisions. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (1997). The prevention and remediation of reading disabilities: Evaluating what we know from research. Journal of Academic Language Therapy,1, 11–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E., Small, S., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2004). Why the reading achievement gap in New Zealand won’t go away: Evidence from the PIRLS 2001 International Study of Reading Achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies,39, 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K., Glaser, D., & Wilcox, D. D. (2006). What education schools aren’t teaching about reading and what elementary teachers aren’t learning. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Sandra Martin-Chang (Concordia University) and Alison Arrow (Massey University) for their assistance in the collection of datafrom Canadaand New Zealand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Binks-Cantrell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E.K., Malatesha Joshi, R. (2020). Do Teacher Candidates in English-Speaking Countries Understand the Structure of the English Language?. In: Gallagher, T.L., Ciampa, K. (eds) Teaching Literacy in the Twenty-First Century Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47821-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47821-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47820-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47821-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics