Abstract
B. F. Skinner noted in 1971 that “there are many reasons why people should now be concerned for the good of all mankind” (p. 137). There is good reason to do so, and given that the most critical contemporary social and environmental issues—and the primary potential steps to address them—are grounded in human behavior, good reason for behavior science to be active in doing so. Even given the limitations of current knowledge, behavior science carries a substantial obligation to work toward rigorous contributions, but also toward their broad applications. As effective interventive directions are identified, it is often challenging to convincingly move toward implementation of those advances through public policy. The authors here explore directions to facilitate applications of behavior science to advance policy decisions that support social and environmental justice, sustainability, and further scientific advances more broadly. Research and practice related to this task requires (a) a firm grounding in essential values and ethics that have not been commonly discussed in behavior analysis, (b) a behaviorally formulated understanding of the public policy process, and (c) behaviorally framed strategic analysis and tools for active participation in that process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Renamed the Association for Behavior Analysis: International (ABAI) in 2008.
- 2.
See Chap. 3 in this volume for more information on cultural systems analysis.
- 3.
The material in Chap. 17 in this volume provides additional helpful material on integrating advocacy work into a broader activism framework.
- 4.
The material in this section is drawn largely from Mattaini (<CitationRef CitationID="CR62" >2013</Citation Ref>), and Mattaini et al. (<CitationRef CitationID="CR64" >2016</Citation Ref>). These will not be additionally cited in this section. Mattaini (<CitationRef CitationID="CR62" >2013</Citation Ref>) is available in open access at: http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120224
References
Adkins, V. K. (1997). Social validity and naturalistic ethics: Wolf and Quine. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v7i2.313
Alejandro, R. (1998). The limits of Rawlsian justice. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Alliance for Justice. (2005). Build your advocacy grantmaking: Advocacy evaluation tool. Retrieved from https://bolderadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Build_Your_Advocacy_Grantmaking_paywall.pdf.
Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1989). Strong states and weak states: Sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400005317
Ball, J., Caldwell, W., & Pranis, K. (2010). Doing democracy with circles: Engaging communities in public planning. St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2000). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices. Reno, NV: Context Press.
Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science, 1(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010024016308
Brady, D., & Burton, L. M. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cardazone, G., & Tolman, R. (2016). Data visualization. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research (pp. 293–303). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carnegie, D. (1936). How to win friends and influence people. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Chandler, M. A. (2018, February 19). For homeless women, violence is a pervasive part or their past and present, report shows. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/for-homeless-women-violence-is-a-pervasive-part-of-their-past-and-present-report-shows/2018/02/19/b928d74c-10e6-11e8-9065-e55346f6de81_story.html.
Coffman, J., & Beer, T. (2015). The advocacy strategy framework. Center for Evaluation Innovation. Retrieved from https://www.evaluationinnovation.org/publication/the-advocacy-strategy-framework-3/.
Cohen, B. E., & Marshall, S. G. (2017). Does public health advocacy seek to redress health inequities? A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(2), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12320
Congdon, W. J., & Shankar, M. (2015). The White House Social & Behavioral Sciences Team: Lessons learned from year one. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(2), 77–86.
Critchfield, T. (2018). An emotional appeal for the development of empirical research on narrative. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41, 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0170-9
Crowley, D. M., Dodge, K. A., Barnett, W. S., Corso, P., Duffy, S., Graham, P., … Karoly, L. A. (2018). Standards of evidence for conducting and reporting economic evaluations in prevention science. Prevention Science, 19(3), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1
Crowley, M. D., Scott, T., & Fishbein, D. (2018). Translating prevention research for evidence-based policymaking: Results from the research-to-policy collaboration pilot. Prevention Science, 19(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0833-x
Davis, K. C., & Duke, J. C. (2018). Evidence of the real-world effectiveness of public health media campaigns reinforces the value of perceived message effectiveness in campaign planning. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 998–1000. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy045
Deering, K. N., Amin, A., Shoveller, J., Nesbitt, A., Garcia-Moreno, C., Duff, P., … Shannon, K. (2014). A systematic review of the correlates of violence against sex workers. American Journal of Public Health, 104(5), e42–e54. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301909
DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.04.002
Devlin-Foltz, D., Fagen, M. C., Reed, E., Medina, R., & Neiger, B. L. (2012). Advocacy evaluation: Challenges and emerging trends. Health Promotion Practice, 13(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912446482
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, W. B. (2018). Why we are still not acting to save the world: The upward challenge of a post-Skinnerian behavior science. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41, 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0162-9
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R., & Vlaev, I. (2012). Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.009
Drollinger, T., Comer, L. B., & Warrington, P. T. (2006). Development and validation of the active empathetic listening scale. Psychology & Marketing, 23(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20105
Erickson, C. L. (2018). Environmental justice as social work practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farmer, P. (2013). In J. Weigel (Ed.), To repair the world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Some values guiding community research and action. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-621
Fawcett, S. B., Bernstein, G. S., Czyzewski, M. J., Greene, B. F., Hannah, G. T., Iwata, B. A., … Winett, R. A. (1988a). Recommendations of the task force on public policy. The Behavior Analyst, 11(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392451
Fawcett, S. B., Bernstein, G. S., Czyzewski, M. J., Greene, B. F., Hannah, G. T., Iwata, B. A., … Winett, R. A. (1988b). Behavior analysis and public policy. The Behavior Analyst, 11(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392450
Fawcett, S. B., Boothroyd, R., Schultz, J. A., Francisco, V. T., Carson, V., & Bremby, R. (2003). Building capacity for participatory evaluation within community initiatives. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 26(2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J005v26n02_03
Fawcett, S. B., Seekins, T., & Jason, L. A. (1987). Policy research and child passenger safety legislation: A case study and experimental evaluation. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1987.tb01300.x
Fawcett, S. B., Seekins, T., Whang, P. L., Muiu, C., & de Balcazar, S. (2008). Creating and using social technologies for community empowerment. Prevention in Human Services, 3(2–3), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1300/J293v03n02_08
Forbes, R., Nesmith, A., Powers, M., & Schmitz, C. (2016, April 11). Environmental justice. Episode 189, in Social Work podcast series. Retrieved from http://www.insocialwork.org/episode.asp?ep=189.
Gandhi, M. K. (1945). Constructive programme: Its meaning and place. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House. Retrieved from https://www.mkgandhi.org/ebks/construct.pdf
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
Goldiamond, I. (1976). Protection of human subjects and patients: A social contingency analysis of distinctions between research and practice, and its implications. Behavior, 4, 1–41. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27758852
Goldiamond, I. (1984). Training parent trainers and ethicists in nonlinear analysis of behavior. In R. F. Dangel & R. A. Polster (Eds.), Parent training: Foundations of research and practice (pp. 504–546). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Goldiamond, I. (2002). Ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 11(2), 108–197. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v11i2.92. (reprinted from Behaviorism 2, 1–84).
Gough, A., Hunter, R. F., Ajao, O., Jurek, A., McKeown, G., Hong, J., … Kee, F. (2017). Tweet for behavior change: Using social media for the dissemination of public health messages. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 3(1), e14. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.6313
Grant, L. K. (2007). The veils of Clio: Dimensions of a behavioral narratology. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393047
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2002). Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Helfert, G., & Vith, K. (1999). Relationship marketing teams: Improving the utilization of customer relationship potentials through a high team design quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00082-6
Hineline, P. N. (2018). Narrative: Why it’s important, and how it works. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(2), 471–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0137-x
Holifield, R., Chakraborty, J., & Walker, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of environmental justice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Holtschneider, C. (2016). From independence to interdependence: Redefining outcomes for transitional living programs for youth experiencing homelessness. Families in Society, 97(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2016.97.26
Hovell, M., Wahlgren, D., & Adams, M. (2009). The logical and empirical basis for the behavioral ecological model. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (pp. 415–449). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Israel, B. A., Coombe, C. M., Cheezum, R. R., Schulz, A. J., McGranaghan, R. J., Lichtenstein, R., … Burris, A. (2010). Community-based participatory research: A capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2094–2102. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506
Jason, L. A., & Glenwick, D. S. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A.. (2014). “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research.” In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process, pp. 183–223. Westview Press: Boulder, CO.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1122–1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kenis, P., & Schneider, V. (1991). Policy networks and policy analysis: Scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds.), Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations (pp. 25–59). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Kiser, L., & Ostrom, E. (1982). The three worlds of action: A metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. Original paper cited by Orach & Schlüter in this chapter is not available, but the central content is found in E. Ostrom (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
Kristof, N., & WuDunn, S. (2020, January 9). Who killed the Knapp family? New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/09/opinion/sunday/deaths-despair-poverty.html.
Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., Chen, X., Köpetz, C., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025488
Lee, C. M. (2016). Speaking up for science. Trends in Immunology, 37(4), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.02.003
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., Ostrom, E., Ouyang, Z., Provencher, W., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., & Taylor, W. W., (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317, 1513–1516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004
Malott, R., & Shane, J. T. (2019). Principles of behavior (7th ed.). London: Psychology Press.
Mattaini, M., & Holtschneider, C. (2017). Collective leadership and circles: Not invented here. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1309334
Mattaini, M. A. (1996). Envisioning cultural practices. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393168
Mattaini, M. A. (2012). Review of the book From task-centered social work to evidence-based and integrative practice: Reflections on history and implementation, by T. L. Rzepnicki, S. G. McCracken, and H. E. Briggs, Eds. Social Service Review, 86(4), 690–694. https://doi.org/10.1086/669619
Mattaini, M. A. (2013). Strategic nonviolent power: The science of Satyagraha. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.
Mattaini, M. A. (2016). Behavioral and time-series approaches. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Green (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research (pp. 177–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mattaini, M. A., Holtschneider, C., & Williams, H. E. (2016). Advocacy, accompaniment, and activism. In M. A. Mattaini & C. Holtschneider (Eds.), Foundations of social work practice (5th ed., pp. 267–285). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Mattaini, M. A., & Luke, M. (2014). “Saving the world” with a matrix. Behavior and Social Issues, 23, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v23i0.5860
Moore, S. K., & Mattaini, M. A. (2001). Consequence analysis: An on-line replication. Behavior and Social Issues, 11(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v11i1.102
Moore, S. K., & Mattaini, M. A. (2014). US social work students’ attitudes shift favorably towards a harm reduction approach to AOD practice: The effectiveness of consequence analysis. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 33(6), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.919106
Mullaly, B., & Dupre, M. (2018). The new structural social work: Ideology, theory, and practice (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nadal, K. L. (2017). “Let’s get in formation”: On becoming a psychologist–activist in the 21st century. American Psychologist, 72, 935–946. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000212
National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of ethics. NASW. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/about/ethics/code-of-ethics/code-of-ethics-english.
Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the “two communities” theory of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
Ninness, C., Ninness, S. K., Rumph, M., & Lawson, D. (2018). The emergence of stimulus relations: Human and computer learning. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0125-6
Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
Orach, K., & Schlüter, M. (2016). Uncovering the political dimension of social-ecological systems: Contributions from policy process frameworks. Global Environmental Change, 40, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.002
Paul, P., & Motskin, M. (2016). Engaging the public with your research. Trends in Immunology, 37(4), 268–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.02.007
Pawson, R., Wong, G., & Owen, L. (2011). Known knowns, known unknowns, unknown unknowns: The predicament of evidence-based policy. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(4), 518–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011403831
Pierce, J. J., Peterson, H. L., Jones, M. D., Garrard, S. P., & Vu, T. (2017). There and back again: A tale of the advocacy coalition framework perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 45, S13–S46. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12197
Pollard, T. D. (2012). The obligation for biologists to commit to political advocacy. Cell, 151(2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.026
Randolph, W., & Viswanath, K. (2004). Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: Marketing health in a crowded media world. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123046
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement.. Belknap Harvard.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability, public policy and management. London: Open University Press.
Sanford, F. L., & Fawcett, S. B. (1980). Consequence analysis: Its effects on verbal statements about an environmental project. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1980.13-57
Scott, J. T., Larson, J. C., Buckingham, S. L., Maton, K. I., & Crowley, D. M. (2019). Bridging the research–policy divide: Pathways to engagement and skill development. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 89(4), 434. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000389
Seekins, T., & Fawcett, S. B. (1986). Public policymaking and research information. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03391928
Seekins, T., Maynard-Moody, S., & Fawcett, S. B. (1987). Understanding the policy process: Preventing and coping with community problems. Prevention in Human Services, 5(2), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1300/j293v05n02_04
Seniuk, H. A., Cihon, T. M., Benson, M., & Luke, M. M. (2019). Making a footprint in environmental sustainability: A behavioral systems approach to engaging the behavioral community. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(4), 911–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00233-y
Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden Two. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY: Knopf/Random House.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Upon further reflection.. Prentice Hall.
Sousa Lourenço, J., Ciriolo, E., Rafael Rodrigues Vieira de Almeida, S., & Troussard, X. (2016). Behavioural insights applied to policy: European Report 2016. https://doi.org/10.2760/903938
Spier, M. S. (1973). Force field analysis. In J. E. Jones & J. William Pfeiffer (Eds.), The 1973 annual handbook for group facilitators (pp. 111–113). San Diego, CA: University Associates.
Swenson, C. C., Henggeler, S. W., Taylor, I. S., & Addison, O. W. (2009). Multisystemic therapy and neighborhood partnerships: Reducing adolescent violence and substance abuse. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., & Scoblic, J. P. (2017). Bringing probability judgments into policy debates via forecasting tournaments. Science, 355(6324), 481–483. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3147
Tsipurski, G., Votta, F., & Roose, K. M. (1918). Fighting fake news and post-truth politics with behavioral science: The pro-truth pledge. Behavior and Social Issues, 27, 47–70. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v27i0.9127
Tufte, E. R. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Valdivia, S., Luciano, C., & Molina, F. J. (2006). Verbal regulation of motivational states. The Psychological Record, 56, 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03396035
Wachs, M. (1990). Ethics and advocacy in forecasting for public policy. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 9, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej199091/215
Weed, D. L., & Mckeown, R. E. (2003). Science and social responsibility in public health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 1804–1808. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6198
Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
Willems, E. P. (1974). Behavioral technology and behavioral ecology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1974.7-151
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014). Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x13001593
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how behavior analysis found its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
Wong, S. L., Green, L. A., Bazemore, A. W., & Miller, B. F. (2017). How to write a health policy brief. Families, Systems & Health, 35(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000238
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Association for Behavior Analysis International
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mattaini, M.A., Esquierdo-Leal, J.L., Ardila Sánchez, J.G., Richling, S.M., Ethridge, A.N. (2020). Public Policy Advocacy in Culturo-Behavior Science. In: Cihon, T.M., Mattaini, M.A. (eds) Behavior Science Perspectives on Culture and Community. Behavior Analysis: Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45420-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45421-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)