Skip to main content
Log in

Public Policymaking and Research Information

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The public policymaking process presents behavior analysts with opportunities to shape public policy and influence decisions that affect the evolution of communities. Although the scientist-advocate’s role in public policymaking has received increased attention, little attention has been given to behavioral analyses of the policymaking context. This paper describes the stages of policymaking, including agenda formation, policy adoption, policy implementation, and policy review. It also analyzes seven types of research information important in agenda formation and policy adoption—information about the dimensions of an issue, number of people affected, relative standing of an issue, interests of those involved, controlling variables, program alternatives, and program acceptability. Methods for communicating research information to policymakers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agar, M. H. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., & Ault, M. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Balch, G. I. (1980). The stick, the carrot, and other strategies: A theoretical analysis of governmental intervention. In J. Brigham & D. W. Brown (Eds.), Policy implementation: Penalties or incentives? (pp. 43–68). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1981). Applied social research: A reformulation of “applied” and “enlightenment” models. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, D. A. (1977). Public policy making in America: An introduction. In D. A. Caputo (Ed.), The politics of policy making in America: Five case studies (pp. 1–6). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P. B. (1983). The personal insights of a legislator/psychologist. American Psychologist, 38, 1216–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R., & Elder, C. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, G. E., Mayer, L. C., Carr, T. R., & Cayer, N. J. (1982). American public policy: An introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1972). Policy research in the social sciences. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., & Seekins, T. (1981). Behavioral assessment, social validity, and policy research: The case of the Kansas Child Passenger Safety Act. Lawrence, KS: Center for Public Affairs, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Seekins, T., Whang, P. W., Muiu, C., & Suarez de Balcazar, Y. (1984). Creating and using social technologies for community empowerment. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, A. E., & Freedman, P. E. (1975). The psychology of political control: Comprising dialogues between a modern prince and his tutor on the application of basic psychological principles to the realm of politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerston, L. N. (1983). Making public policy: From conflict to resolution. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, H. B. (1984). Scientist and congress. Science, 244, 127–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, E. (1983). A researcher in the policy arena: The case of child labor. American Psychologist, 38, 104–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, C. S. (1977). Group power: Lobbying and public policy. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jason, L. A., & Rose, T. (1984). Influencing the passage of child passenger restraint legislation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. J. (1976). Applied anthropology and the application of anthropological knowledge. Human Organization, 35, 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, W. J., & Ogul, M. S. (1985). The American legislative process: Congress and the states. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1981). Congressmen’s voting decisions. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • League of Women Voters (1972a). Anatomy of a hearing. Washington, DC: League of Women Voters of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • League of Woman Voters (1972b). The politics of change: Goals, conflict, and power in the community. Washington, DC: League of Women Voters of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • League of Women Voters (1976). Making an issue of it: The campaign handbook. Washington, DC: League of Women Voters of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (1981). The history and politics of community mental health. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lustberg, A. (1982). Testifying with impact. Washington, DC: Chamber of Commerce of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., Kahn, A. J., & Everett, B. A. (1983). The role of psychological research in the formation of policies affecting children. American Psychologist, 38, 80–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J. C. (1984). Psychology, research, and social policy. American Psychologist, 39, 851–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R. B. (1985). Child development and society: A primer on disseminating information to the public through the mass media. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Advances in applied developmental psychology (pp. 1–23). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monis, E.K. (1985). Public information, dissemination, and behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallak, M. (1983). Psychology in the public forum. American Psychologist, 37, 475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D. J., Fawcett, S. B., & Wright, P. (1981). Introduction. In D. J. Palumbo, S. B. Fawcett, & P. Wright (Eds.), Evaluating and optimizing public policy (pp. ix–xv). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, M. (1970). Power and pluralism: A view from the bottom. The Journal of Politics, 32, 501–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. C., & Lovrich, N. P. (1982). Knowledge and politics: The distribution and consequences of policy-relevant information among citizens, activists, legislators, and experts. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 521–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade, E. S. (1975). Analysis for public decisions. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values, research, and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., & Schon, D. A. (1977). Problem setting in policy research. In C. A. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 235–251). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R. F. (1977). Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 199–211). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N. (1984). Ethics and advocacy. American Psychologist, 39, 787–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, M. A., Czyzewski, M. J., Plante, T. G., & Otis, A. J. (1985). Behavior therapy and social policy: AABT’s national social policy network revisited. The Behavior Therapist, 8, 207–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekins, T., & Fawcett, S. B. (1983). Placing social policy issues on the public agenda: A behavioral analysis and case studies of the use of research information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, DC.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stokey, E., & Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A primer for policy analysis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, S.B. (1981). Adoption of innovations from applied behavioral research: “Does anybody care?” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 491–505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1985). A behaviorist’s response to the report of the national commission on excellence in education. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 29–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Takanishi, R. (1981). Preparing a policy-relevant report: Guidelines for authors. Los Alamitos, CA: SWRL Educational Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, S. R. (1972). Foundations of political action: An exchange theory of politics. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L. (1977). Setting the agenda in the U.S. Senate: A theory of problem selection. Journal of Political Science, 7, 423–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, W. A., & Roberts, H. V. (1956). Statistics: A new approach. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1977). Introduction. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 1–22). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1977). The challenge of social research to decision making. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 213–233). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yokley, J. M., & Glenwick, D. S. (1984). Increasing the immunization of preschool children: An evaluation of applied community interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 313–325.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., & Muenchow, S. (1984). How to influence social policy affecting children and families. American Psychologist, 39, 415–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was partially supported by a grant from the National Institute of Handicapped Research (#G 008006928).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seekins, T., Fawcett, S.B. Public Policymaking and Research Information. BEHAV ANALYST 9, 35–45 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391928

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391928

Navigation