Abstract
The public policymaking process presents behavior analysts with opportunities to shape public policy and influence decisions that affect the evolution of communities. Although the scientist-advocate’s role in public policymaking has received increased attention, little attention has been given to behavioral analyses of the policymaking context. This paper describes the stages of policymaking, including agenda formation, policy adoption, policy implementation, and policy review. It also analyzes seven types of research information important in agenda formation and policy adoption—information about the dimensions of an issue, number of people affected, relative standing of an issue, interests of those involved, controlling variables, program alternatives, and program acceptability. Methods for communicating research information to policymakers are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agar, M. H. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic Press
Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., & Ault, M. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.
Balch, G. I. (1980). The stick, the carrot, and other strategies: A theoretical analysis of governmental intervention. In J. Brigham & D. W. Brown (Eds.), Policy implementation: Penalties or incentives? (pp. 43–68). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Bulmer, M. (1981). Applied social research: A reformulation of “applied” and “enlightenment” models. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 187–210.
Caputo, D. A. (1977). Public policy making in America: An introduction. In D. A. Caputo (Ed.), The politics of policy making in America: Five case studies (pp. 1–6). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Carpenter, P. B. (1983). The personal insights of a legislator/psychologist. American Psychologist, 38, 1216–1219.
Cobb, R., & Elder, C. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cochran, G. E., Mayer, L. C., Carr, T. R., & Cayer, N. J. (1982). American public policy: An introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1972). Policy research in the social sciences. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Corporation.
Fawcett, S. B., & Seekins, T. (1981). Behavioral assessment, social validity, and policy research: The case of the Kansas Child Passenger Safety Act. Lawrence, KS: Center for Public Affairs, University of Kansas.
Fawcett, S. B., Seekins, T., Whang, P. W., Muiu, C., & Suarez de Balcazar, Y. (1984). Creating and using social technologies for community empowerment. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 145–171.
Freedman, A. E., & Freedman, P. E. (1975). The psychology of political control: Comprising dialogues between a modern prince and his tutor on the application of basic psychological principles to the realm of politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.
Gerston, L. N. (1983). Making public policy: From conflict to resolution. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Gonzalez, H. B. (1984). Scientist and congress. Science, 244, 127–129.
Greenberger, E. (1983). A researcher in the policy arena: The case of child labor. American Psychologist, 38, 104–111.
Greenwald, C. S. (1977). Group power: Lobbying and public policy. New York: Praeger.
Jason, L. A., & Rose, T. (1984). Influencing the passage of child passenger restraint legislation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 485–495.
Jones, D. J. (1976). Applied anthropology and the application of anthropological knowledge. Human Organization, 35, 221–229.
Keefe, W. J., & Ogul, M. S. (1985). The American legislative process: Congress and the states. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kingdon, J. W. (1981). Congressmen’s voting decisions. New York: Harper & Row.
League of Women Voters (1972a). Anatomy of a hearing. Washington, DC: League of Women Voters of the United States.
League of Woman Voters (1972b). The politics of change: Goals, conflict, and power in the community. Washington, DC: League of Women Voters of the United States.
League of Women Voters (1976). Making an issue of it: The campaign handbook. Washington, DC: League of Women Voters of the United States.
Levine, M. (1981). The history and politics of community mental health. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: Macmillan Press.
Lustberg, A. (1982). Testifying with impact. Washington, DC: Chamber of Commerce of the United States.
Maccoby, E. E., Kahn, A. J., & Everett, B. A. (1983). The role of psychological research in the formation of policies affecting children. American Psychologist, 38, 80–84.
Masters, J. C. (1984). Psychology, research, and social policy. American Psychologist, 39, 851–862.
McCall, R. B. (1985). Child development and society: A primer on disseminating information to the public through the mass media. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Advances in applied developmental psychology (pp. 1–23). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Monis, E.K. (1985). Public information, dissemination, and behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 95–110.
Pallak, M. (1983). Psychology in the public forum. American Psychologist, 37, 475.
Palumbo, D. J., Fawcett, S. B., & Wright, P. (1981). Introduction. In D. J. Palumbo, S. B. Fawcett, & P. Wright (Eds.), Evaluating and optimizing public policy (pp. ix–xv). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Parenti, M. (1970). Power and pluralism: A view from the bottom. The Journal of Politics, 32, 501–530.
Pierce, J. C., & Lovrich, N. P. (1982). Knowledge and politics: The distribution and consequences of policy-relevant information among citizens, activists, legislators, and experts. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 521–554.
Quade, E. S. (1975). Analysis for public decisions. New York: American Elsevier.
Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values, research, and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Rein, M., & Schon, D. A. (1977). Problem setting in policy research. In C. A. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 235–251). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Rich, R. F. (1977). Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 199–211). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Robinson, D. N. (1984). Ethics and advocacy. American Psychologist, 39, 787–793.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Schlosberg, M. A., Czyzewski, M. J., Plante, T. G., & Otis, A. J. (1985). Behavior therapy and social policy: AABT’s national social policy network revisited. The Behavior Therapist, 8, 207–209.
Seekins, T., & Fawcett, S. B. (1983). Placing social policy issues on the public agenda: A behavioral analysis and case studies of the use of research information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, DC.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.
Stokey, E., & Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A primer for policy analysis. New York: Norton.
Stolz, S.B. (1981). Adoption of innovations from applied behavioral research: “Does anybody care?” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 491–505.
Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1985). A behaviorist’s response to the report of the national commission on excellence in education. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 29–38.
Takanishi, R. (1981). Preparing a policy-relevant report: Guidelines for authors. Los Alamitos, CA: SWRL Educational Research and Development.
Waldman, S. R. (1972). Foundations of political action: An exchange theory of politics. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Walker, J. L. (1977). Setting the agenda in the U.S. Senate: A theory of problem selection. Journal of Political Science, 7, 423–445.
Wallis, W. A., & Roberts, H. V. (1956). Statistics: A new approach. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Weiss, C. H. (1977). Introduction. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 1–22). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Weiss, C. H., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1977). The challenge of social research to decision making. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 213–233). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
Yokley, J. M., & Glenwick, D. S. (1984). Increasing the immunization of preschool children: An evaluation of applied community interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 313–325.
Zigler, E., & Muenchow, S. (1984). How to influence social policy affecting children and families. American Psychologist, 39, 415–420.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this manuscript was partially supported by a grant from the National Institute of Handicapped Research (#G 008006928).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seekins, T., Fawcett, S.B. Public Policymaking and Research Information. BEHAV ANALYST 9, 35–45 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391928
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391928