Skip to main content

Teachers Designing Classroom Curriculum through the Lens of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory

  • Chapter
Activity Theory in Education

Abstract

Teachers in the compulsory education sector interpret curriculum within their school setting to design educational programmes that address intended learning for students. This chapter reports on the use of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory to better understand the influences that guide teachers’ planning of school based curriculum and teaching pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, B. (2010). Theorising teaching. Waikato Journal of Education, 15(2), 21–40. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v15i2.111

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24. Retrieved from http://doi.org/3699898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakers, J. (2011). Activity Theory as a pedagogical framework for the delivery of technology education. In M. Barak & M. Hacker (Eds.), Fostering human development through engineering and technology education (Vol. 6, pp. 19–34). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity Theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R.-L. Punamaki, & R. Miettinen (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P.-L., van Eijck, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Students’ representations of scientific practice during a science internship: Reflections from an activity-theoretic perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1243–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98–106. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, B., Garraway, J., & Farmer, J. (2015). Influence of the past on professional lives: A collective summary. Mind, Culture and Activity, 22(1), 23–36. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.979949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (1st ed.,pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marien, M. (Ed.). (1996). Environmental issues and sustainable futures: A critical guide to recent books, reports and periodicals. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (2009). Key concepts for understanding curriculum (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. McGee, J., & Taylor, M. (2008). Planning for effective teaching and learning. In C. McGee & D. Fraser (Eds.), The professional practice of teaching (3rd ed., pp. 116–135). Melbourne, Victoria: Cengage Learning Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). New Zealand curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1–13. Wellington, New zealand: Learning Media Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (2011). Home NZQA. Retrieved May 2, 2011, from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., & Nicholls, H. (1972). Developing a curriculum: A practical guide. London, England: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S. (2009). Using Activity Theory to understand prospective teachers’ attitudes to and construction of special educational needs and / or disabilities. Teacher and Teacher Education, 25(2009), 559–568. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. (1996). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses (Vol. 17). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth. (2004). Activity Theory and education: An introduction. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(1), 1–8. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1101_1

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: An activity–theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 253–282. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, M. N. H. M., Tahir, L. M., Ali, M. F., Noor, N. M., Atan, N. A., & Zaleha, A. (2014). Using Activity Theory as analytical framework for evaluating contextual online collaborative learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(5), 54–59. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i5.3972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 195–212. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/1350462950010206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2014). Education for sustainable development: United Nations decade (2005–2014). Retrieved December 4, 2014, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-theinternational-agenda/education-for-sustainable-development/education-for-sustainable-development/

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Dilani S. P. Gedera P. John Williams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lockley, J. (2016). Teachers Designing Classroom Curriculum through the Lens of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. In: Gedera, D.S.P., Williams, P.J. (eds) Activity Theory in Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2_12

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-387-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics