Skip to main content

Working Memory Training

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Training

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a limited capacity system which is responsible for simultaneously maintaining and processing information. Reliable individual differences in this capacity place limiting constraints for performing other cognitive activities. Thus, WM training might even benefit a wide range of cognitive functions. This prospect makes WM training very prominent and also controversial. In the present chapter, we briefly illustrated common training regimes and reviewed the empirical evidence for training effects on the trained WM tasks, near transfer to nontrained WM tasks, and far transfer to different cognitive functions. Consistent evidence across different age groups from all over the lifespan and across several meta-analyses speaks in favor of significant average training effects and significant near transfer to nontrained WM tasks. However, evidence for far transfer to, for example, fluid intelligence, executive functions, and academic achievement, is mixed. We reviewed current topics of discussion in the field and concluded that a greater focus on variables possibly moderating transfer effects (e.g., individual differences and situational characteristics during training) is necessary to better understand conflicting findings. More research on far transfer effects is needed because even small effects could actually make a difference relevant to everyday life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aksayli, N. D., Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2019). The cognitive and academic benefits of Cogmed: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 366–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, J., Buschkuehl, M., Duncan, G. J., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2016). There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., … & Van’t Veer, A. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürki, C., Ludwig, C., Chicherio, C., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). Individual differences in cognitive plasticity: An investigation of training curves in younger and older adults. Psychological Research, 78, 821–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S., Kobel, A., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Braintwister: Aufgabensammlung für kognitives training [Braintwister: Tasks for cognitive training]. Bern: Universität Bern, Institut für Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., Lawlor-Savage, L., & Goghari, V. M. (2017). Functional brain activation associated with working memory training and transfer. Behavioral Brain Research, 334, 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin, E., Neely, A., Larsson, A., Bäckman, L., & Nyberg, L. (2008). Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science, 320, 1510–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, D., Simpson-Kent, I. L., Bathelt, J., The CALM Team, & Kievit, R. A (2019). A hierarchical watershed model of fluid intelligence in childhood and adolescence. Cerebral Cortex. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz091

  • Gathercole, S. E., Dunning, D. L., Holmes, J., & Norris, D. (2019). Working memory training involves learning new skills. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2014). On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments. Psychological Research, 78, 756–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., Bavelier, D., Kramer, A. F., Vinogradov, S., Ansorge, U., Ball, K. K.,... & Facoetti, A. (2019). Improving methodological standards in behavioral interventions for cognitive enhancement. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3, 2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guye, S., De Simoni, C., & von Bastian, C. C. (2017). Do individual differences predict change in cognitive training performance? A latent growth curve modeling approach. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1, 374–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, J. L., Nelson, R. A., Thomason, M. E., Sternberg, D. A., Katovich, K., Farzin, F., & Scanlon, M. (2015). Enhancing cognitive abilities with comprehensive training: A large, online, randomized, active-controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 10, e0134467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. (2000). The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., Woolgar, F., Hampshire, A., & Gathercole, S. E. (2019). Are working memory training effects paradigm-specific? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J., & Meier, B. (2010). The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory, 18, 394–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work: A meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science, 25, 2027–2037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Könen, T., & Karbach, J. (2015). The benefits of looking at intraindividual dynamics in cognitive training data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 659–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working-memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2016). There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is effective: A reply to Au et al. (2014) and Karbach and Verhaeghen (2014). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wagner, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., & Chein, J. (2011). Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L., Murphy, K., & Andrews, G. (2019). Immediate and long-term efficacy of executive functions cognitive training in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 698–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 45–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K. (2015). Training of intelligence: A question of intelligent training. Retrieved from: http://www.psychonomic.org/featured-content-detail/training-of-intelligence-question-of-intelligent-t

  • Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, E., Brown, G. D., Conway, A., Cowan, N.,... & Ma, W. J. (2018). Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 885–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L.,... & Tao, S. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 48–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, G., Aksayli, N. D., Tatlidil, K., Tatsumi, T., Gondo, Y., & Gobet, F. (2019). Near and far transfer in cognitive training: A second-order meta-analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 5, 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, T., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2012). On the impacts of working memory training on executive functioning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2014). Younger adults show long-term effects of cognitive training on broad cognitive abilities over 2 years. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2304–2310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaighofer, M., Fischer, F., & Bühner, M. (2015). Does working memory training transfer? A meta-analysis including training conditions as moderators. Educational Psychologist, 50, 138–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinaver, C. S., Entwistle, P. C., & Söderqvist, S. (2014). Cogmed WM training: Reviewing the reviews. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 3, 163–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017). Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1077–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Smith, M., & Klingberg, T. (2015). Benefits of a working memory training program for inattention in daily life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10, e0119522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T. W., Waskom, M., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2016). Intensive working memory training produces functional changes in large-scale frontoparietal networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titz, C., & Karbach, J. (2014). Working memory and executive functions: Effects of training on academic achievement. Psychological Research, 78, 852–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Distinct transfer effects of training different facets of working memory capacity. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: A review. Psychological Research, 78, 803–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bastian, C. C., Locher, A., & Ruflin, M. (2013). Tatool: A Java-based open-source programming framework for psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weicker, J., Hudl, N., Frisch, S., Lepsien, J., Mueller, K., Villringer, A., & Thöne-Otto, A. (2018). WOME: Theory-based working memory training –A placebo-controlled, double-blind evaluation in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A., & Oberauer, K. (2013). What is working memory, and how can we measure it? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Könen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Könen, T., Strobach, T., Karbach, J. (2021). Working Memory Training. In: Strobach, T., Karbach, J. (eds) Cognitive Training. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39292-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics