Skip to main content

Climate Change: Macroeconomic Impact and Implications for Monetary Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecological, Societal, and Technological Risks and the Financial Sector

Abstract

Climate change and policies to mitigate it could affect a central bank’s ability to meet its monetary stability objective. Climate change can affect the macroeconomy both through gradual warming and the associated climate changes (e.g. total seasonal rainfall and sea level increases) and through increased frequency, severity and correlation of extreme weather events (physical risks). Inflationary pressures might arise from a decline in the national and international supply of commodities or from productivity shocks caused by weather-related events such as droughts, floods, storms and sea level rises. These events can potentially result in large financial losses, lower wealth and lower GDP. An abrupt tightening of carbon emission policies could also lead to a negative macroeconomic supply shock (transition risks). This chapter reviews the channels through which climate risks can affect central banks’ monetary policy objectives, and possible policy responses. Approaches to incorporate climate change in central bank modelling are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The NGFS’s first comprehensive report was published in April 2019 (NGFS 2019).

  2. 2.

    A survey of experimental studies reported by Dell et al. (2014) concluded that there is a productivity loss in various cognitive tasks of about 2% per 1 °C for temperatures over 25 °C.

  3. 3.

    Batten (2018) provides a more detailed discussion of the literature.

  4. 4.

    See the minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee Meeting on 20 September 2005.

  5. 5.

    See the minutes of the BoJ Monetary Policy Meeting on 14 March 2011.

  6. 6.

    See the statement of the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors released on 18 March 2011, and Bank of Japan (2011).

  7. 7.

    Growth accounting assumes that the output elasticity of energy equals the cost share of energy in production in a competitive economy.

  8. 8.

    The share of bioenergy is assumed to increase in the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6 which is likely to keep the warming below 2 °C (van Vuuren et al. 2011). IEA (2013) also projects that in order to achieve a 50% reduction in energy-related CO2emissions by 2050 (from 2005 levels), biofuels would need to provide 27% of the total global transport fuel, up from 3% currently. But there is a question over the sustainability of large-scale bioenergy production, given the competition with other land and biomass needs, such as food security and biodiversity conservation (Fuss et al. 2014).

  9. 9.

    Climate policy can also have a range of benefits in addition to the gains from reducing future climate change damage: these are often referred to as co-benefits. For example, policies that encourage innovation in low-carbon technologies can spill over to other industries and stimulate economic growth. Moreover, climate policy might result in productivity growth if they improve the allocation of resources or increase their degree of utilisation. Mitigation actions targeting clean energy technologies or energy efficiency are found to induce improvements in air quality by reducing local air pollution such as particulate matter, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which are damaging for human health. Co-benefits can be expected to cover a significant part of climate change mitigation costs (see e.g. Bollen et al. 2009; Groosman et al. 2011). An attractive feature of co-benefits is that they occur in the medium run, while the direct benefits of GHG mitigation policies in terms of reduction of the impact of climate change are likely to occur only in the longer run.

  10. 10.

    Other types of climate policies, such as incentives to innovation and investment in low-carbon technologies, can instead lead to an increase in potential supply.

  11. 11.

    Another example is OECD (2015).

  12. 12.

    See Turrell (2016) for a further discussion of ABMs application to macroeconomics.

  13. 13.

    See, for example, Bordo et al. (2001).

  14. 14.

    For a similar diagram for extreme weather events, see Figure 10.1 in Batten et al. (2018).

References

  • Acevedo, S., Mrkaic, M., Novta, N., Pugacheva, E., & Petia, T. (2018). The effects of weather shocks on economic activity: What are the channels of impact? IMF Research Department Working Paper, No. 18/144). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMS—American Meteorological Society. (2018). Explaining extreme events in 2017 from a climate perspective. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 99(12), 1359–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of England. (2015). The impact of climate change on the UK insurance sector: A climate change adaptation report by the Prudential Regulation Authority. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of England. (2018). The impact of adverse weather. Inflation report, Q1, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Japan. (2011). Responses to the Great East Japan earthquake by payment and settlement systems and financial institutions in Japan. Payment and Settlement Systems Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, S. (2018). Climate change and the macroeconomy: A critical review. Bank of England Staff Working Paper, No. 706. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, S., Sowerbutts, R., & Tanaka, M. (2016). Let’s talk about the weather: The impact of climate change on central banks. Bank of England Staff Working Paper, No. 603. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, S., Sowerbutts, R., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change: What implications for central banks and financial regulators? In B. Caldecott (Ed.), Stranded assets and the environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P. A., Achuta Rao, K. M., Allen, M. R., Gillett, N., Gutzler, D., Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Hu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I. I., Overland, J., Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., & Zhang, X. (2013). Detection and attribution of climate change: From global to regional. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloesch, J., & Gourio, F. (2015). The effect of winter weather on U.S. economic activity. Economic Perspectives, 39(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg. (2019). Is climate change drying up German rivers – and growth? Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-25/climate-change-is-probably-bringing-down-germany-s-growth.

  • Boldin, M., & Wright, J. H. (2015). Weather adjusting economic data. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2015(Fall), 227–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, J., Guay, B., Jamet, S., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2009). Co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies: Literature review and new results. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. 693. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. D., Dueker, M. J., & Wheelock, D. C. (2001). Aggregate price shocks and financial stability: The United Kingdom 1796–1999. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper, No. 2001-018). St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 462–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon – climate change and financial stability. Speech at Lloyd’s of London, London, 29 September 2015. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2018). Remarks at the accounting for sustainability summit 2018 accounting for sustainability forum, London, 21 November 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, E. A., & Noy, I. (2010). The economics of natural disasters: A survey. IDB Working Paper Series, No. 124. Washington, DC: IDB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cœuré, B. (2018). Monetary policy and climate change. Speech given at the conference on Scaling up Green Finance: The Role of Central Banks. Berlin, 8 November 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn, S. M., Vergeer, R., Shep, E., Hoen, M. T., Korteland, M., Cludius, J., Schumacher, K., Zell-Ziegler, C., & Healy, S. (2015). Ex-post investigation of cost pass-through in the EU ETS. An analysis for six sectors, European Union Commission, November 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debelle, G. (2019). Climate change and the economy. Speech given at the Public Forum hosted by the Centre for Policy Development. Sydney, 12 March 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, M., Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. A. (2012). Temperature shocks and economic growth: Evidence from the last half century. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4(3), 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, M., Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. A. (2014). What do we learn from the weather? The new climate–economy literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(3), 740–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deryugina, T., & Hsiang, S. M. (2014). Does the environment still matter? Daily temperature and income in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. 20750. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • El Hadri, H., Mirza, D., & Rabaud, I. (2017). Natural disasters and countries’ exports: New insights from a new (and an old) database. Document de Recherche du Laboratoire d’Économie d’Orléans, No. 2017-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRB—European Systemic Risk Board. (2016). Too late, too sudden: Transition to a low-carbon economy and systemic risk. Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee No. 6. Frankfurt am Main: European Systemic Risk Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabra, N., & Reguant, M. (2014). Pass-through of emission costs in electricity markets. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2872–2899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser, S., & Tol, R. S. J. (2005). On climate change and economic growth. Resource and Energy Economics, 27, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felbermayr, G., & Gröschl, J. (2013). Natural disasters and the effect of trade on income: A new panel IV approach. European Economic Review, 58(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Jones, C. D., Kraxner, F., Nakicenovic, N., & Le Quéré, C. (2014). Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 850–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassebner, M., Keck, A., & Teh, R. (2010). Shaken, not stirred: The impact of disasters on international trade. Review of International Economics, 18(2), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatti, D., & Desiderio, S. (2015). Monetary policy experiments in an agent-based model with financial frictions. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 10(2), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourio, F. (2015). The effect of weather on first-quarter GDP. Chicago Fed Letter, No. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groosman, B., Muller, N. Z., & O’Neill-Toy, E. (2011). The ancillary benefits from climate policy in the United States. Environmental and Resource Economics, 50(4), 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualdi, S., Tarzia, M., Zamponi, F., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2015). Tipping points in macroeconomic agent-based models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 50, 2961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, A., Khadan, J., & Strobl, E. (2016). The inflationary costs of extreme weather in developing countries. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintermann, B. (2016). Pass-through of CO2 emission costs to hourly electricity prices in Germany. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(4), 857–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houser, T., Hsiang, S., Kopp, R., & Larsen, K. (2015). Economic risks of climate change: An American Prospectus. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang, S. M., & Jina, A. S. (2014). The causal effect of environmental catastrophe on long-run economic growth: evidence from 6,700 cyclones. NBER Working Paper No. 20352. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA—International Energy Agency. (2013). Technology road map: Biofuels for transport. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. In Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.). World meteorological organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, Y. (1990). Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, B. D., & Pakko, M. R. (2010). Monetary policy and natural disasters in a DSGE model. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Research Division Working Paper, no. 2007-025D. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, B. D., & Pakko, M. R. (2011). Monetary policy and natural disasters in a DSGE model. Southern Economic Journal, 77(4), 973–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, T. (2017). Thermometer rising – Climate change and Canada’s economic future. Remarks for the Finance and Sustainability Initiative. Montréal, 2 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. R. (2019). Climate change and the Irish financial system. Economic Letters, 01/EL/19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesk, C., Rowhani, P., & Ramankutty, N. (2016). Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature, 529, 84–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lise, W., Sijm, J., & Hobbs, B. F. (2010). The impact of the EU ETS on prices, profits and emissions in the power sector: Simulation results with the COMPETES EU20 model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. J., Morris, A., Wilcoxen, P. J., & Panton, S. J. (2017). Climate change and monetary policy: Dealing with disruption. Brookings Climate and Energy Discussion Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersch, Y. (2018). Climate change and central banking. Speech at the Workshop discussion Sustainability is becoming mainstream. Frankfurt am Main, 27 November 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGFS—Network for Greening the Financial System. (2019). A call for action: Climate change as a source of financial risk. Retrieved from https://www.banque-france.fr/en/financial-stability/international-role/network-greening-financial-system.

  • OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). The economic consequences of climate change. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, C., & Reuveny, R. (2010). Climatic natural disasters, political risk, and international trade. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (2018). The impact of disasters on inflation. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, 2(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt, A., & Siebenhüner, B. (2005). Agent based modeling and adaptation to climate change. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 74(2), 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peersman, G. (2018). International food commodity prices and missing (dis)inflation in the euro area. CESifo Working Paper, No. 7338. Munich: CESifo.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (2013). Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 860–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, V., & Henry, A. D. (2016). Agent-based modelling of consumer energy choices. Nature Climate Change, 6, 556–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudebusch, G. D. (2019). Climate change and the Federal Reserve. FRBSF Economic Letters, No. 2019-09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M., van Huizen, J., & Jung, C. (2017). The Bank of England’s response to climate change. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q2, 98–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, S., Toman, M., & Withagen, C. (2014). Growth theory and ‘green growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2013). The structure of economic modeling of the potential impacts of climate change: Grafting gross underestimation of risk onto already narrow science models. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 838–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott, P. A. (2016). How climate change affects extreme weather events. Science, 352(6293), 1517–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott, P. A., Christidis, N., Otto, F. E. L., Sun, Y., Vanderlinden, J. P., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Vautard, R., von Storch, H., Walton, P., Yiou, P., & Zwiers, F. W. (2016). Attribution of extreme weather and climate-related events. WIREs Climate Change, 7, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TCFD—Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosure. (2018). 2018 Status report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thober, J., Schwarz, N., & Hermans, K. (2018). Agent-based modeling of environment-migration linkages: A review. Ecology and Society, 23(2), 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell, A. (2016). Agent-based models: Understanding the economy from the bottom up. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin Series, Q4, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • US (United States) Senate. (2019). Letter to the Honorable Jerome H. Powell, Chairman of the Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System, 25 January. Retrieved from https://www.schatz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Letter%20to%20Federal%20Reserve,%20OCC,%20FDIC%20re%20Climate%20Change.pdf?mod=article_inline.

  • Van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J. F., & Masui, T. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change, 109, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Wan, H., Zwiers, F. W., Hegerl, G. C., & Min, S.-K. (2013). Attributing intensification of precipitation extremes to human influence. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 5252–5257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Batten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Batten, S., Sowerbutts, R., Tanaka, M. (2020). Climate Change: Macroeconomic Impact and Implications for Monetary Policy. In: Walker, T., Gramlich, D., Bitar, M., Fardnia, P. (eds) Ecological, Societal, and Technological Risks and the Financial Sector. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38858-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics