Skip to main content

Challenges and Prospects for Sugarcane Biorefineries in Mitigating Climate Change

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Climate Change Management

Abstract

Commercial crop management practices for sugarcane, corn, soybeans and other commodities have been exclusively aimed at increasing productivity and profitability, due to the growing demand for raw materials for food, fodder and biofuels, mainly ethanol and biodiesel produced in biorefineries. This production strategy has resulted in a decrease in soil organic matter, as well as the content and availability of soil nutrients and microbiota. It has also reduced the soil’s ecological function due to excessive deforestation resulting from logging and the traditional slash-and-burn system followed by tillage, carried out for the extensive establishment of cash crops entailing the unsustainable use of agrochemicals and the burning of agricultural residues. Similarly, conventional agriculture, like other anthropogenic actions, generates greenhouse gas emissions, mainly by emitting carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane, which cause climate change and this phenomenon, in turn, has gradually affected the efficiency and success of managing conventional farming systems and their sustainability. Therefore, this chapter provides a systematic review of academic research on the direct effect of extensive agricultural practices on climate change used in cultivating sugarcane, the main raw material of biorefineries. In addition, the chapter discusses how specific actions with current technologies and sustainable management strategies appropriate for this crop, available for use in biorefineries, can be useful in mitigating the effects of climate change in the short term in Latin America

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilar-Rivera N, Michel-Cuello C, Cárdenas-González JF (2019) Green revolution and sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education. Springer, Cham, pp 833–850

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JA, Gipmans M, Hurst S, Layton R, Nehra N, Pickett J, Shah DM, Lívio SL, Tripathi L (2016) Emerging agricultural biotechnologies for sustainable agriculture and food security. J Agric Food Chem 64:383–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Autrey LJC, Jolly L, de Périndorge PL (2020) Competitiveness of different sugarcane industries in an era of low sugar prices. Sugar Ind 145(2):94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard R, O’Farrel OJ, Richardson DM (2015) Anticipating potential biodiversity conflicts for future biofuel crops in South Africa: incorporating spatial filters with species distribution models. GCB Bioenergy 7:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges CD, Carvalho JLN, Kolln OT et al (2019) Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? Biomass Bioenergy 120:21–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso TF, Watanabe MD, Souza A, Chagas MF, Cavalett O, Morais ER, Bonomi A (2018) Economic, environmental, and social impacts of different sugarcane production systems. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 12(1):68–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castro SGQ, Zotelli LC, Carvalho JLN, Franco HCJ (2019) Sugarcane yield and nitrogen losses associated with different methods of applying N fertilizer. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 30:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Chohan M (2019) Impact of climate change on sugarcane crop and remedial measures-a review. Pak Sugar J 34(1):15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark M, Tilman D (2017) Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ Res Lett 12. 11p

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi S, Muminjanov H (2019) Conservation agriculture. Training guide for extension agents and farmers in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma, 123p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortez LAB, Franco TT, Bonomi A (2019) Future perspectives of sugarcane biofuels. In: Sugarcane biofuels. Springer, Cham, pp 445–460

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva Bicalho E, Moitinho MR, De Bortoli TD, Panosso AR, Spokas KA, La Scala N (2017) Soil greenhouse gases: relations to soil attributes in a sugarcane production area. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81(5):1168–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dattamudi S, Wang JJ, Dodla SK, Viator HP, DeLaune R, Hiscox A, Colyer P (2019) Greenhouse gas emissions as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and harvest residue management in sugarcane production. Agrosyst Geosci Environ 2(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshout PM, van der Velde M, van Zelm R, Steinmann ZJ, Huijbregts MA (2019) Comparing greenhouse gas footprints and payback times of crop-based biofuel production worldwide. Biofuels 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2019.1630056

  • FAOSTAT (2020) Food and agriculture data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2015) Status of the world’s soil resources, technical summary. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma, 79p

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2016) The state of food and agriculture; climate change, agriculture and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 173p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2017) A literature review on frameworks and methods for measuring and monitoring sustainable agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma, 64p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero T (2016) Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability 8:281. 41p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han M, Zhu B (2020) Changes in soil greenhouse gas fluxes by land use change from primary forest. Glob Chang Biol 26:2656–2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Li J, Fang W, Liu P, Guo M, Yan D, Wang Q, Cao A (2016) Effect of soil fumigation on degradation of pendimethalin and oxyfluorfen in laboratory and ginger field studies. J Agric Food Chem 64:8710–8721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huarachi DAR, Piekarski CM, Puglieri FN, de Francisco AC (2020) Past and future of social life cycle assessment: historical evolution and research trends. J Clean Prod 264:121506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsch R (2018) Global spread of conservation agriculture. Int J Environ Stud 76:29. 23p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenluecke MK, Zhou C, Smith T, Thompson N, Nucifora N (2020) The impact of climate change on the Australian sugarcane industry. J Clean Prod 246:118974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loboguerrero AM, Campbell BM, Cooper PJ, Hansen JW, Rosenstock T, Wollenberg E (2019) Food and earth systems: priorities for climate change adaptation and mitigation for agriculture and food systems. Sustainability 11(5):1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü S, Feng C, Gao C, Wang X, Xu X, Bai X, Gao N, Liu M (2016) Multifunctional environmental smart fertilizer based on l-aspartic acid for sustained nutrient release. J Agric Food Chem 64:4965–4974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Guido SI, González-Campos JB, Ponce-Ortega JM, Nápoles-Rivera F, El-Halwagi MM (2016) Optimal reconfiguration of a sugar cane industry to yield an integrated biorefinery. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18(2):553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martíni AF, Valani GP, Boschi RS, Bovi RC, da Silva LFS, Cooper M (2020) Is soil quality a concern in sugarcane cultivation? A bibliometric review. Soil Tillage Res 204:104751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meza-Palacios R, Aguilar-Lasserre AA, Morales-Mendoza LF, Pérez-Gallardo JR, Rico-Contreras JO, Avarado-Lassman A (2019) Life cycle assessment of cane sugar production: the environmental contribution to human health, climate change, ecosystem quality and resources in México. J Environ Sci Health A 54(7):668–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad-Naser H, Nagata O, Sultana S, Hatano R (2020) Carbon sequestration and contribution of CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes to global warming potential from paddy-fallow fields on mineral soil beneath peat in Central Hokkaido, Japan. Agriculture 10:6. 18p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moitinho MR, Padovan MP, da Silva BE, Ferraudo AS, Teixeira DDB, de Souza Bahia ASR, La Scala Jr N (2018) Short-term soil CO2 emission and soil attributes under contrasting sugarcane cultivars. Sugar Tech 20(6):658–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mugica-Álvarez V, Hernández-Rosas F, Magaña-Reyes M, Herrera-Murillo J, Santiago-De La Rosa N, Gutiérrez-Arzaluz M, …, González-Cardoso G (2018) Sugarcane burning emissions: characterization and emission factors. Atmos Environ 193:262–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla S, Singh SK, Singh KK, Praveen B (2020) Climate change and agriculture: a review of crop models. In: Global climate change and environmental policy. Springer, Singapore, pp 423–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng T, Fu J, Jiang D, Du J (2020) Simulation of the growth potential of sugarcane as an energy crop based on the APSIM model. Energies 13(9):2173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JR, Challinor AJ, Henriksen CB, Howden SM, Martre P, Smith P (2019) Invited review: intergovernmental panel on climate change, agriculture, and food – a case of shifting cultivation and history. Glob Chang Biol 25(8):2518–2529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Waha K, Jarvis L, Kremen C, Herrero M, Rieseberg LH (2018) Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69:789–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanches GM, Paula MTND, Magalhães PSG, Duft DG, Vitti AC, Kolln OT, Franco HCJ (2019) Precision production environments for sugarcane fields. Sci Agric 76(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder BL, Wood AW, Skocaj DM, Jensen TA, Allsopp PG (2019) Enterprise-specific sustainable sugarcane production – making the most of what you’ve got! Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 30:1637–1645

    Google Scholar 

  • Singels A, Jones MR, Lumsden TG (2019) Potential for sugarcane production under current and future climates in South Africa: sugar and ethanol yields, and crop water use. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 30:1123–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Quirk RG, Shukla SK (2019) Green management for sustainable sugar industry. Sugar Tech 21:183–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubando AT, Felix CB, Chen WH (2019) Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: a comprehensive review. Bioresour Technol 299:122585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ureta C, González EJ, Espinosa A, Trueba A, Piñeyro-Nelson A, Álvarez-Buylla ER (2020) Maize yield in Mexico under climate change. Agric Syst 177:102697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Meijl H, Havlik P, Lotze-Campen H, Stehfest E, Witzke P, Pérez Domínguez I, Bodirsky B, Van Dijk M, Doelman J, Fellmann T, Humpenoeder F, Levin-Koopman J, Mueller C, Popp A, Tabeau A, Valin H (2017) Challenges of global agriculture in a climate change context by 2050 (AgCLIM50). JRC science for policy report. 64p. EUR 28649 EN Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/7724

  • Vos R, Bellù LG (2019) Global trends and challenges to food and agriculture into the 21st century. In: Sustainable food and agriculture. Academic, Amsterdam, pp 11–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noé Aguilar-Rivera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aguilar-Rivera, N., Michel-Cuello, C. (2021). Challenges and Prospects for Sugarcane Biorefineries in Mitigating Climate Change. In: Leal Filho, W., Luetz, J., Ayal, D. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22759-3_245-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22759-3_245-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22759-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22759-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics