Abstract
The depleting fossil fuels and their serious environmental impact have heightened the need for an alternative renewable energy resource. The hydrogen obtained from sunlight-assisted water splitting is found to be a promising alternate to the fossil fuel. The proposal of generating hydrogen from solar water splitting has a great potential to solve the energy and environmental issues and introduce an energy revolution in sustainable and cleaner way. A variety of photocatalysts ranging from organic to inorganic materials have been studied, but their overall efficiency is limited due to varied reasons. The prevalent reason is the poor control over the recombination of photoexcited charge carriers. It has been investigated that integrating different materials in the form of heterojunction can improve the photocatalyst’s efficiency in multiple folds. These heterojunctions would enhance the charge carrier mobility and lifetime, absorption coefficient, stability, etc. which leads to improved charge separation at the heterointerface and hence their efficiency in H2 generation by photo-assisted water splitting.
In view of this, the present chapter mainly focuses on reviewing TiO2-based heterojunctions, a widely studied material for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. The basic working principle of different heterojunctions of TiO2, their concerned drawbacks, and the recent impressive progress in developing other forms of TiO2 heterojunctions are presented. In addition, the overviews of synthesis strategies of various TiO2-based heterojunction materials are reviewed. The performance and stability of any heterojunction photocatalyst are dependent on the synergistic functioning of the interfaces between the individual materials forming heterojunction. The study of light matter interaction in these heterointerfaces is expected to provide crucial information helpful for exploiting the potential of these photocatalysts for commercial viability. Therefore, the present chapter also demonstrates the existing methodologies to probe these heterojunctions under light irradiation for charge carrier dynamic analysis. Finally, the chapter is concluded with the ups and downs of TiO2-based heterojunction research and the future perspectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anandan S, Yoon M (2003) Photocatalytic activities of the nano-sized TiO2-supported Y-zeolites. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 4:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-5567(03)00002-9
Bärtsch M, Niederberger M (2017) The role of interfaces in heterostructures. ChemPlusChem 82:42–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201600519
Boppella R, Kochuveedu ST, Kim H, Jeong MJ, Marques Mota F, Park JH, Kim DH (2017) Plasmon-sensitized graphene/TiO2 inverse opal nanostructures with enhanced charge collection efficiency for water splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:7075–7083. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b14618
Chen X, Mao SS (2007) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev 107:2891–2959. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0500535
Chen Z et al (2011) Accelerating materials development for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production: standards for methods, definitions, and reporting protocols. J Mater Res 25:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2010.0020
Cheng P, Yang Z, Wang H, Cheng W, Chen M, Shangguan W, Ding G (2012) TiO2–graphene nanocomposites for photocatalytic hydrogen production from splitting water. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:2224–2230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.004
Dasgupta U, Bera A, Pal AJ (2017) Band diagram of heterojunction solar cells through scanning tunneling spectroscopy. ACS Energy Lett 2:582–591. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00635
Dong J et al (2018) Boosting heterojunction interaction in electrochemical construction of MoS2 quantum dots@TiO2 nanotube arrays for highly effective photoelectrochemical performance and electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Electrochem Commun 93:152–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2018.07.008
Elbanna O, Fujitsuka M, Majima T (2017) g-C3N4/TiO2 Mesocrystals composite for H2 evolution under visible-light irradiation and its charge carrier dynamics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:34844–34854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b08548
Enzhou L, Peng X, Jia J, Xiaozhuo Z, Zhen J, Jun F, Xiaoyun H (2018) CdSe modified TiO2 nanotube arrays with Ag nanoparticles as electron transfer channel and plasmonic photosensitizer for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Phys D Appl Phys 51:305106
Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:37. https://doi.org/10.1038/238037a0
Gao H, Zhang P, Hu J, Pan J, Fan J, Shao G (2017a) One-dimensional Z-scheme TiO2/WO3/Pt heterostructures for enhanced hydrogen generation. Appl Surf Sci 391:211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.170
Gao Y et al (2017b) Directly probing charge separation at Interface of TiO2 phase junction. J Phys Chem Lett 8:1419–1423. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00285
Hao C, Wang W, Zhang R, Zou B, Shi H (2018) Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting with TiO2@Ag2O nanowire arrays via p-n heterojunction formation. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 174:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.08.033
Haring AJ, Ahrenholtz SR, Morris AJ (2014) Rethinking band bending at the P3HT–TiO2 Interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:4394–4401. https://doi.org/10.1021/am500101u
He H et al (2016) MoS2/TiO2 edge-on Heterostructure for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv Energy Mater 6:1600464. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600464
Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Rev 95:69–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a004
Jang JS et al (2017) Vertically aligned core–shell PbTiO3@TiO2 heterojunction nanotube array for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic applications. J Phys Chem C 121:15063–15070. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03081
Kafizas A et al (2016) Where do photogenerated holes go in anatase: rutile TiO2? A transient absorption spectroscopy study of charge transfer and lifetime. Chem A Eur J 120:715–723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b11567
Kalanur SS, Hwang YJ, Joo O-S (2013) Construction of efficient CdS–TiO2 heterojunction for enhanced photocurrent, photostability, and photoelectron lifetimes. J Colloid Interface Sci 402:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.049
Kang J, Wu F, Li S-S, Xia J-B, Li J (2012) Calculating band alignment between materials with different structures: the case of anatase and rutile titanium dioxide. J Phys Chem C 116:20765–20768. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3067525
Kim G-H et al (2015) High-efficiency colloidal quantum dot photovoltaics via robust self-assembled monolayers. Nano Lett 15:7691–7696. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03677
Kumar A, Shalini SG et al (2017) Facile hetero-assembly of superparamagnetic Fe3O4/BiVO4 stacked on biochar for solar photo-degradation of methyl paraben and pesticide removal from soil. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 337:118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.01.010
Li G et al (2015) Ionothermal synthesis of black Ti3+-doped single-crystal TiO2 as an active photocatalyst for pollutant degradation and H2 generation. J Mater Chem A 3:3748–3756. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA02873B
Lian Z, Wang W, Li G, Tian F, Schanze KS, Li H (2017) Pt-enhanced mesoporous Ti3+/TiO2 with rapid bulk to surface Electron transfer for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:16959–16966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11494
Liao C-H, Huang C-W, Wu JCS (2012) Hydrogen production from semiconductor-based Photocatalysis via water splitting. Catalysts 2:490
Licht S (2001) Multiple band gap semiconductor/electrolyte solar energy conversion. J Phys Chem B 105:6281–6294. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp010552j
Liu L, Liu Z, Liu A, Gu X, Ge C, Gao F, Dong L (2014) Engineering the TiO2–graphene Interface to enhance photocatalytic H2 production. ChemSusChem 7:618–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201300941
Low J, Jiang C, Cheng B, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Yu J (2017) A review of direct Z-scheme Photocatalysts. Small Methods 1:1700080. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700080
Melvin AA, Illath K, Das T, Raja T, Bhattacharyya S, Gopinath CS (2015) M-Au/TiO2 (M = Ag, Pd, and Pt) nanophotocatalyst for overall solar water splitting: role of interfaces. Nanoscale 7:13477–13488. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr03735b
Mills A, Davies RH, Worsley D (1993) Water purification by semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev 22:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1039/cs9932200417
Montoya AT, Gillan EG (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from transition-metal surface-modified TiO2. ACS Omega 3:2947–2955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02021
Navarro Yerga RM, Álvarez Galván MC, del Valle F, Villoria de la Mano JA, Fierro JLG (2009) Water splitting on semiconductor catalysts under visible-light irradiation. ChemSusChem 2:471–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.200900018
Niu M, Cheng D, Cao D (2014) SiH/TiO2 and GeH/TiO2 heterojunctions: promising TiO2-based Photocatalysts under visible light. Sci Rep 4:4810. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04810
Park S, Ruoff RS (2009) Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol 4:217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.58
Piyush K, Yun Z, Najia M, Ujwal KT, Benjamin DW, Ryan K, Karthik S (2018) Heterojunctions of mixed phase TiO2 nanotubes with Cu, CuPt, and Pt nanoparticles: interfacial band alignment and visible light photoelectrochemical activity. Nanotechnology 29:014002
Preethi LK, Antony RP, Mathews T, Loo SCJ, Wong LH, Dash S, Tyagi AK (2016) Nitrogen doped anatase-rutile heterostructured nanotubes for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production: promising structure for sustainable fuel production. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:5865–5877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.125
Preethi LK, Antony RP, Mathews T, Walczak L, Gopinath CS (2017a) A study on doped heterojunctions in TiO2 nanotubes: an efficient Photocatalyst for solar water splitting. Sci Rep 7:14314. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14463-0
Preethi LK, Mathews T, Nand M, Jha SN, Gopinath CS, Dash S (2017b) Band alignment and charge transfer pathway in three phase anatase-rutile-brookite TiO2 nanotubes: an efficient photocatalyst for water splitting. Appl Catal B Environ 218:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.033
Ren X et al (2018) NiO/Ni/TiO2 nanocables with Schottky/p-n heterojunctions and the improved photocatalytic performance in water splitting under visible light. J Colloid Interface Sci 530:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.06.071
Saha A, Sinhamahapatra A, Kang T-H, Ghosh SC, Yu J-S, Panda AB (2017) Hydrogenated MoS2 QD-TiO2 heterojunction mediated efficient solar hydrogen production. Nanoscale 9:17029–17036. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR06526D
Saravanan R, Manoj D, Qin J, Naushad M, Gracia F, Lee AF, Khan MM, Gracia-Pinilla MA (2018) Mechanothermal synthesis of Ag/TiO2 for photocatalytic methyl orange degradation and hydrogen production. Process Saf Environ Prot 120:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.09.015
Scanlon DO et al (2013) Band alignment of rutile and anatase TiO2. Nat Mater 12:798–801. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3697
Shen S, Wang X, Chen T, Feng Z, Li C (2014) Transfer of Photoinduced electrons in anatase–rutile TiO2 determined by time-resolved mid-infrared spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 118:12661–12668. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502912u
Siripala W, Ivanovskaya A, Jaramillo TF, Baeck S-H, McFarland EW (2003) A Cu2O/TiO2 heterojunction thin film cathode for photoelectrocatalysis. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 77:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00343-4
Sun S (2015) Recent advances in hybrid Cu2O-based heterogeneous nanostructures. Nanoscale 7:10850–10882. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR02178B
Tan Y, Shu Z, Zhou J, Li T, Wang W, Zhao Z (2018) One-step synthesis of nanostructured g-C3N4/TiO2 composite for highly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution. Appl Catal B Environ 230:260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.056
Uddin MT, Nicolas Y, Olivier C, Jaegermann W, Rockstroh N, Junge H, Toupance T (2017) Band alignment investigations of heterostructure NiO/TiO2 nanomaterials used as efficient heterojunction earth-abundant metal oxide photocatalysts for hydrogen production. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:19279–19288. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP01300K
Wang X et al (2015) Transient absorption spectroscopy of Anatase and rutile: the impact of morphology and phase on photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 119:10439–10447. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01858
Wang X, Shen S, Feng Z, Li C (2016) Time-resolved photoluminescence of anatase/rutile TiO2 phase junction revealing charge separation dynamics. Chin J Catal 37:2059–2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62574-3
Xiao J, Xie Y, Cao H (2015) Organic pollutants removal in wastewater by heterogeneous photocatalytic ozonation. Chemosphere 121:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.072
Xie M, Fu X, Jing L, Luan P, Feng Y, Fu H (2014) Long-lived, visible-light-excited charge carriers of TiO2/BiVO4 nanocomposites and their unexpected photoactivity for water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 4:1300995. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201300995
Xu QC, Wellia DV, Ng YH, Amal R, Tan TTY (2011) Synthesis of porous and visible-light absorbing Bi2WO6/TiO2 heterojunction films with improved photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performances. J Phys Chem C 115:7419–7428. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1090137
Xu F, Zhang L, Cheng B, Yu J (2018) Direct Z-scheme TiO2/NiS Core–Shell hybrid nanofibers with enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:12291–12298. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02710
Yan J, Wu H, Chen H, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Liu SF (2016) Fabrication of TiO2/C3N4 heterostructure for enhanced photocatalytic Z-scheme overall water splitting. Appl Catal B Environ 191:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.026
Yang J-S, Lin W-H, Lin C-Y, Wang B-S, Wu J-J (2015) n-Fe2O3 to N+-TiO2 heterojunction Photoanode for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:13314–13321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01489
Yubin C, Chi-Hung C, Zhixiao Q, Shaohua S, Tennyson D, Clemens B (2017) Electron-transfer dependent photocatalytic hydrogen generation over cross-linked CdSe/TiO2 type-II heterostructure. Nanotechnology 28:084002
Yue X, Yi S, Wang R, Zhang Z, Qiu S (2017) A novel architecture of dandelion-like Mo2C/TiO2 heterojunction photocatalysts towards high-performance photocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting. J Mater Chem A 5:10591–10598. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA02655B
Zhang P, Tachikawa T, Fujitsuka M, Majima T (2015) Efficient charge separation on 3D architectures of TiO2 mesocrystals packed with a chemically exfoliated MoS2 shell in synergetic hydrogen evolution. Chem Commun 51:7187–7190. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC01753J
Zhang H, Liu F, Wu H, Cao X, Sun J, Lei W (2017) In situ synthesis of g-C3N4/TiO2 heterostructures with enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. RSC Adv 7:40327–40333. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06786K
Zhao Z-J et al (2017) Three-dimensional plasmonic Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite architectures on flexible substrates for visible-light photocatalytic activity. Sci Rep 7:8915. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09401-z
Zhong R, Zhang Z, Yi H, Zeng L, Tang C, Huang L, Gu M (2018) Covalently bonded 2D/2D O-g-C3N4/TiO2 heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl Catal B Environ 237:1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.066
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Preethi, L.K., Antony, R.P., Mathews, T. (2020). Titania-Based Heterojunctions for Hydrogen Generation by Water Photolysis. In: Rajendran, S., Naushad, M., Ponce, L., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Green Photocatalysts for Energy and Environmental Process. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17638-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17638-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17637-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17638-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)