Abstract
Total hip arthroplasty has been one of the most successful orthopedic procedures over the past 30 years. Currently, several surgical approaches for hip arthroplasty have been defined; these include the anterior, lateral, and posterolateral approaches. In literature the advantages and disadvantages of each surgical approach have been documented and which approach will be chosen depends on the experience of the surgeon. This chapter focuses on anterior minimally invasive surgery (AMIS). This surgical approach follows an intermuscular and inter-nervous plane to reduce the risk of injury to muscles, tendons, vessels, and nerves. This review discusses the history, technique, tricks, and pitfalls of AMIS procedure that reduces anatomical invasiveness and blood loss and speeds up the functional recovery of the patient.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hunter SC. Southern hip exposure. Orthopedics. 1986;9:1425–8.
Jones W. Fractures of the neck of femur. Br J Surg. 1936;23:787–808.
Smith Petersen MN. Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;31A:40–6.
Rachbauer F, Kain MS, Leunig M. The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:311–20.
Smith Petersen MN. A new supra–articular subperiosteal approach to the hip joint. J Orthop Surg (Phila, Pa). 1917;s2–15:593.
Judet J, Judet R. The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 1950;32(B):166–73.
O’Brien RM. The technic for insertion of femoral head prosthesis by the straight anterior or Hueter approach. Clin Orthop. 1955;6:22–6.
Charnley J. Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet. 1961;1:1129–32.
Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;(72):7–21.
Charnley J, Cupic Z. The nine and ten year results of the low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973:9–25.
Tsukada S, Wakui M. Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: five year average follow up results. Open Orthop J. 2015;9:157–62.
Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplast. 2008;23:266–72.
Amarasekera HW. Surface replacement of the hip joint. In: Fokter SK, editor. Recent advances in hip and knee arthroplasty. 1st ed. Croatia: Intech; 2012. p. 181–90.
Paillard P. Hip replacement by a minimal anterior approach. Int Orthop. 2007;31(Suppl 1):S13–5.
Oinuma K, Eingartner C, Saito Y, Shiratsuchi H. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007;19:310–26.
Nogler M, Mayr E, Krismer M. The direct anterior approach to the hip revisionOper Orthop Traumatol. 2012;24:153–64.
Rachbauer F. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach. Orthopade. 2006;35:723-4–6-9.
Rachbauer F, Krismer M. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2008;20:239–51.
Rodriguez JA, Deshmukh AJ, Rathod PA, et al. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:455–63.
Zhang Z, Wang C, Yang P, Dang X, Wang K. Comparison of early rehabilitation effects of total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach versus posterior approach. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018;32:329–33.
Jahng KH, Bas MA, Rodriguez JA, Cooper HJ. Risk factors for wound complications after direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:2583–7.
Watts CD, Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Sculco PK, Chalmers BP, Taunton MJ. High risk of wound complications following direct anterior total hip arthroplasty in obese patients. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:2296–8.
Barton C, Kim PR. Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:371–5.
Kreuzer S, Leffers K, Kumar S. Direct anterior approach for hip resurfacing: surgical technique and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1574–81.
Khemka A, Mograby O, Lord SJ, Doyle Z, Al Muderis M. Total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach using a neck preserving stem: safety, efficacy and learning curve. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52:124–32.
Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:595–603.
Wayne N, Stoewe R. Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini invasive approach. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2009;1:e27.
Faldini C, Mazzotti A, Perna F, et al. Modified minimally invasive direct anterior approach through a bikini incision for total hip arthroplasty: technique and results in young female patients. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017;31:83–9.
Amarasekera H. Surgical approaches to the hip joint and its clinical implications in adult hip arthroplasty. In: Kinov P, editor. Arthroplasty. 1st ed. London: Intech; 2013.
Acknowledgement
Figures and illustrations by: Dakshini Egodawatte MBBS (SAITM), Clinical demonstrator in Trauma and Orthopaedics Neville Fernando Teaching Hospital, Malabe, Sri Lanka.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amarasekera, H. (2019). The Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip. In: Iyer, K., Khan, W. (eds) General Principles of Orthopedics and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15089-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15089-1_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15088-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15089-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)