Abstract
Social interdependence theory has provided a conceptual framework to understand cooperation and competition through a common mechanism: Social interdependence, i.e., the mechanism whereby the outcomes of individuals in a group are affected by the actions of the other group members. Positive social interdependence is the set of rules, norms, or practices that requires all group members to contribute to a common goal in order to fulfill individual goals. Negative social interdependence requires that some members fulfill their goals to the detriment of others’ goals. We review the research showing how social interdependence affects group members’ perceptions and behaviors, which in turn influence their learning outcomes. We focus on cooperation and the work that showed how cooperation requires positive goal interdependence, but also group members’ responsibility and accountability, interactions directed toward the promotion of the partners, the use of social skills, and critical reflection upon group processes. Then we turn to the literature on cooperative methods in education, and we provide evidence that they favor learning outcomes, psychological and social adjustment, and positive relationships, as compared to competitive and individualistic methods. However, cooperation is vulnerable to threatening social comparison, and we provide evidence that interactions among group members that focus on relative status instead of the task may reduce the beneficial effects of cooperation. Finally, we report an intervention study that illustrates how the implementation of cooperative methods requires training and promotion. Social Interdependence and the Promotion of Cooperative Learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrami, P. C. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Harcourt College Pub: Fort Worth, Texas.
Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Bennett, B., Rolheiser, C., & Stevahn, L. (1991). Cooperative learning: Where hearts meets mind. Ontario, Canada: Educational Connections.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London, UK: Granada Learning.
Buchs, C. (2017). Apprendre ensemble: des pistes pour structurer les interactions en classe (Learning together: Recommendations for structuring classroom interaction). In M. Giglio & F. Arcidiacono (Eds.), Les interactions sociales en classe: réflexions et perspectives (p. 2017). Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2001). Complementarity of information and quality of relationship in cooperative learning. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011392906032
Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2004). Socio-cognitive conflict and the role of student interaction in learning. New Review of Social Psychology, 3, 80–87.
Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Is a partner’s competence threatening during dyadic cooperative work? It depends on resource interdependence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173007
Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2015). Cooperative learning and social skills development. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Developments in research and practice (pp. 201–217). New York, NY: Nova Science.
Buchs, C., Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Resource in(ter)dependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000211661
Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict resolution and cognitive outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 43, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4301_4
Buchs, C., Gilles, I., Antonietti, J. P., & Butera, F. (2016). Why students need to be prepared to cooperate: A cooperative nudge in statistics learning at university. Educational Psychology, 36, 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1075963
Buchs, C., Margas, N., Cazin, C., Ramirez, M., & Fratianni, S. (2018). Des activités plurilingues dans une perspective coopérative pour favoriser l’équité dans les classes caractérisée par une forte diversité linguistique (Multi-lingual activities in a cooperative perspective promote equality in classes with a high linguistic diversity). Education et francophonie, 46(2), 249–269.
Buchs, C., Pulfrey, C., Gabarrot, F., & Butera, F. (2010). Competitive conflict regulation and informational dependence in peer learning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.631
Butera, F., & Buchs, C. (2005). Reasoning together: From focussing to decentring. In V. Girotto & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), The shape of reason (pp. 193–203). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Butera, F., & Darnon, C. (2017). Competence assessment, social comparison and conflict regulation. In A. Elliot, C. Dweck, & D. Yaeger (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (Theory and application) (2nd ed., pp. 192–213). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low-competence source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250408
Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2001). Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. In C. De Dreu & N. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 160–182). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., VanYperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1238
Darnon, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2002). Epistemic and relational conflict in sharing information during cooperative learning. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.61.3.139
Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., Delmas, F., Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012824
De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.418
De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204
Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275–319). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., Delmas, F., & Butera, F. (2008). Achievement goals and social judgment: The performance-approach paradox. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 247–271.
Dyson, B. (2001). Cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.20.3.264
Elliot, A. J., Jury, M., & Murayama, K. (2018). Trait and perceived environmental competitiveness in achievement situations. Journal of Personality, 86, 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12320
Esser, J. K. (1998). Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 116–141. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2758
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903415150
Hwong, N., Caswell, A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1993). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning on prospective elementary teachers’ music achievement and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712118
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson, D. W. (2009). Reaching out: Interpersonal effectiveness and self-actualization (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D. W. (2015). Constructive controversy: Theory, research, practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316105818
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. (2006). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213–240. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543044002213
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Social interdependence theory and university instruction: Theory into practice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.61.3.119
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 285–358. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.4.285-358
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2007). Creative controversy: Intellectual challenge in the classroom (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2015). Theoretical approaches to cooperative learning. In R. M. Gillies (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Developments in research and practice (pp. 17–46). New York, NY: Nova Science.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom (6th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 5, 5–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053001005
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved from http://www.co-operation.org/pages/cl-methods.html
Karau, S., & Williams, K. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
Kaufman, N. H. (1994). A survey of law school grading practices. Journal of Legal Education, 44, 415–423.
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Positive interdependence, academic and collaborative-skills group contingencies and isolated students. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 476–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023003476
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 237–280). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Muller, D., & Fayant, M. P. (2010). On being exposed to superior others: Consequences of self-threatening upward social comparisons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00279.x
Muller Mirza, N., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Eds.). (2009). Argumentation and education. Theoretical foundations and practices. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-009-9176-5
Neugebauer, J., Ray, D., & Sassenberg, K. (2016). When being worse helps: The influence of upward social comparisons and knowledge awareness on learner engagement and learning in peer-to-peer knowledge exchange. Learning & Instruction, 44, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.007
Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2011). Why grades engender performance avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023911
Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Why neo-liberal values of self-enhancement lead to cheating in higher education: A motivational account. Psychological Science, 24, 2153–2162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613487221
Quiamzade, A., & Mugny, G. (2009). Social influence and threat in confrontations between competent peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015822
Ray, D., Neugebauer, J., Sassenberg, K., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2013). Motivated shortcomings in explanation: The role of comparative self-evaluation and awareness of explanation recipient knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029339
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
Roseth, C. J., Lee, Y. K., & Saltarelli, W. A. (2019). Reconsidering jigsaw social psychology: Longitudinal effects on social interdependence, sociocognitive conflict regulation, motivation, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 149–169
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Cultural and individual value correlates of capitalism: A comparative analysis. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701388963
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … Dirilen-Gumus, O. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative learning: A diversified pedagogy for diverse classrooms. Intercultural Education, 21(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675981003760390
Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1086/222258
Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin comp.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.429
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 344–360). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 43, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.963370
Smith, K., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1981). Can conflict be constructive? Controversy versus concurrence seeking in learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 651. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.73.5.651
Sommet, N., Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Did my MD really go to university to learn? Detrimental effects of numerus clausus on self-efficacy, mastery goals and learning. PLoS One, 8(12), e84178. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084178
Tjosvold, D. (1984). Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations, 37, 743–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403700903
Tjosvold, D., & Tjosvold, M. (2015). Building the team organization: How to open minds, resolve conflict, and ensure cooperation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479938
Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333176
Tomasetto, C., Matteucci, M. C., Carugati, F., & Selleri, P. (2009). Effect of task presentation on students’ performances in introductory statistics courses. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9081-z
Topping, K. J., Buchs, C., Duran, D., & Van Keer, H. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
Triandis, H. C. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 27, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719302700301
Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772
Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible sociocultural model and cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9, 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4
Yager, S., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Snider, B. (1986). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1986.9713601
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butera, F., Buchs, C. (2019). Social Interdependence and the Promotion of Cooperative Learning. In: Sassenberg, K., Vliek, M.L.W. (eds) Social Psychology in Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13787-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13788-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)