Abstract
The tourism experience has always been closely linked to visual communication and photography. Travelers like to bring home visual proofs of their journey or keep visual memories of what they have experienced. The convergence of digital cameras with mobile and networked communication has had a profound impact on visual practices in the tourism domain. This has increased, for instance, the number, relevance, and uses of user-generated visuals. Today’s travelers, the “unsung armies of semiotics,” represent and co-construct tourism experiences by capturing and sharing photographs online. Consequently, visual representations play an instrumental role in the creation of the image of a destination, attraction, or experience – sometimes providing a different view than the one suggested by official channels.
Acknowledging the crucial role that visuals play as means or ends, and their importance for researchers as well as practitioners, this chapter is concerned with how to examine the increasing number of visuals and of visual data that is produced by both official sources, like destination marketing/management organization (DMO) websites, and nonofficial sources, such as user-generated content (UGCs) on social media. The first part of the chapter gives a brief overview of methods of visual analysis for the examination (1) of small sets of images (iconographic and semiotic analysis), (2) of larger sets of visual data (quantitative visual analysis), and (3) mixed approaches. The second part of the chapter focuses on the use of visuals for research processes, with emphasis on the potentials of using (1) visuals in interviews (visual elicitation), (2) visitor-employed photography (VEP), and (3) visual-sorting tasks. Future directions in visual tourism research are discussed at the end.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abascal ET, Fluker M, Jiang M (2016) Domestic demand for Indigenous tourism in Australia: understanding intention to participate. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 24(8–9):1350–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1193187
Aiello G (2006) Theoretical advances in critical visual analysis: perception, ideology, mythologies, and social semiotics. J Vis Lit 26(2):89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2006.11674635
Albers PC, James WR (1988) Travel photography: a methodological approach. Ann Tour Res 15(1):134–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90076-X
Andersson D, Getz D, Vujicic S, Robinson NS, Cavicchi A (2016) Preferred travel experiences of foodies: an application of photo elicitation. J Vacat Mark 55(67):55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766715589621
Arefieva V, Egger R, Yu J (2021) A machine learning approach to cluster destination image on Instagram. Tour Manag 85:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104318
Arthur S, Martin M, Lewis J, McNaughton-Nicholls C (2014) Designing fieldwork. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton-Nicholls C, Ormston R (eds) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, London, pp 147–176
Atkin A (2008) Incon, index, and symbol. In: Hogan P (ed) The Cambrige encyclopaedia of language sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 367–368
Awan F, Gauntlett D (2011) Creative and visual methods in audience research. In: Nightingale V (ed) The handbook of media audiences. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 360–379
Balomenou N, Garrod B (2019) Photographs in tourism research: prejudice, power, performance and participant-generated images. Tour Manag 70:201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.014
Banks M, Zeitlyn D (2015) Visual methods in social research. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi/Singapore
Barthes R (1964a) Elements of semiology. Hill and Wang, New York
Barthes R (1964b) Rhétorique de l’image. Communications 4:40–51. Retrieved 23 July 2019, from https://www.persee.fr/doc/comm_0588-8018_1964_num_4_1_1027
Bell P (2006) Content analysis of visual images. In: van Leeuwen T, Jewitt C (eds) Handbook of visual analysis. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi, pp 10–34
Bell P, Milic M (2002) Goffman’s gender advertisements revisited: combining content analysis with semiotic analysis. Vis Commun 1(2):203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100205
Bernkopf D, Nixon L (2019) The impact of visual social media on the projected image of a destination: the case of Mexico City on Instagram. Pesonen J, Neidhardt J (eds) Information and communication technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05940-8_12
Bock A, Isermann H, Knieper T (2012) Quantitative content analysis of the visual. In: Margolis E, Pauwels L (eds) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi, pp 265–282
Cheng M, Edwards D (2019) A comparative automated content analysis approach on the review of the sharing economy discourse in tourism and hospitality. Curr Issues Tour 22(1):35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1361908
Cherem GJ (1972) Looking through the eyes of the public or public images as social indicators of aesthetic opportunity. Aestrhetics opportunity colloquium. Utah State University, Logan
Collier J (1957) Photography in anthropology: a report on two experiments. Am Anthropol 59(5):843–859. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1957.59.5.02a00100
Collier J (1987) Visual anthropology’s contribution to the field of anthropology. Vis Anthropol 1(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.1987.9966459
Collier J, Collier M (1986) Visual anthropology: photography as a research method. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque
Cui H, Mittal V, Datar M (2006) Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews. In: AAAI’06 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence. Association for Computing Machinery, Boston, pp 1265–1270
Culler J (1990) The semiotics of tourism. In: Culler J (ed) Framing the sign: criticism and its institutions. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp 1–10
Dakin S (2003) There is more to landscape than meets the eye: towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. Can Geogr 47(2):185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0064.t01-1-00003
Dennis EK, Goldberg PA (1996) Weight control self-efficacy types and transitions affect weight-loss outcomes in obese women. Addict Behav 21(1):103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(95)00042-9
Dewar K, Mei L, Davis HC (2007) Photographc images, culture, and perception in tourism advertising. J Travel Tour Mark 22(2):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v22n02_03
Fincher S, Tenenberg J (2005) Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Syst 22(3):89–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2005.00299.x
García-Álvarez J, Puente-Lozano P, Trillo-Santamaría J-M (2014) Representing Spain: cultural image and geographic knowledge in National Geographic’s articles on Spain. GeoJournal 79(5):539–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9510-1
Garrod B (2008) Understanding the relationship between tourism destination imagery and tourist photography. J Travel Res 47(3):346–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508322785
Gou S, Shibata S (2017) Using visitor-employed photography to study the visitor experience on a pilgrimage route – a case study of the Nakahechi Route on the Kumano Kodo pilgrimage network in Japan. J Travel Res 18:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2017.01.006
Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville, A (2016) Deep learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Gretzel U (2021) Dreaming about travel: a Pinterest netnography. In: Information and communication technologies in tourism 2021. Springer, Cham, pp 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65785-7_23
Grittmann E, Ammann I (2011) Quantitative Bildtypenanalyse [Quantitative image type analysis]. In: Petersen T, Schwender C (eds) Die Entschlüsselung der Bilder. Methoden zur Erforschung visueller Kommunikation. Ein Handbuch [Decoding pictures. Methods for the exploration of visual communication. A handbook]. Herbert von Halem, Cologne, pp 163–177
Grittmann E, Lobinger K (2011) Quantitative Bildinhaltsanalyse. In: Petersen T, Schwender C (eds) Die Entschlüsselung der Bilder. Methoden zur Erforschung visueller Kommunikation. Ein Handbuch. Herbert von Halem, Köln, pp 145–162
Guttman R, Greenbaum CW (1998) Facet theory: its development and current status. Eur Psychol 3(1):13–36. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.3.1.13
Hansen SA (2016) Testing visitor produced pictures as a management strategy to study visitor experience qualities – a Swedish marine case study. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 14:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.05.001
Hao X, Wu B, Morrison MA, Wang F (2016) Worth thousands of words? Visual content analysis and photo interpretation of an outdoor tourism spectacular performance in Yangshuo-Guilin, China. Anatolia 27(2):201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2015.1082921
Harper D (2002) Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation. Vis Stud 17(1):13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
Haywood MK (1990) Visitor-employed photography: an urban visit assessment. J Travel Res 29(1):25–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759002900106
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hung K (2018) Understanding the cruising experience of Chinese travelers through photo-interviewing technique and hierarchical experience model. Tour Manag 69:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.05.018
Hunter CW (2015) The visual representation of border tourism: Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) and Dokdo in South Korea. Int J Tour Res 17(2):151–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1973
Hunter CW (2016) The social construction of tourism online destination image: a comparative semiotic analysis of the visual representation of Seoul. Tour Manag 54:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.012
i Augustí DP (2018) Characterizing the location of tourist images in cities. Differences in user-generated images (Instagram), official tourist brochures and travel guides. Ann Tour Res 73:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.09.001
Janusz K, Six S, Vanneste D (2017) Building tourism-resilient communities by incorporating residents’ perceptions? A photo-elicitation study of tourism development in Bruges. J Tour Futur 3(2):127–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-04-2017-0011
Karpathy A, Toderici G, Shetty S, Leung T, Sukthankar R, Fei-Fei L (2014) Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Columbus, pp 1725–1732
Kerstetter D, Bricker K (2009) Exploring Fijian’s sense of place after exposure to tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17(6):691–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580902999196
Knieper T, Müller MG (2018) Zur Bedeutung von Bildkontexten und Produktionsprozessen für die Analyse visueller Kommunikation. In: Lobinger K (ed) Handbuch Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 1–12
Költringer C, Dickinger A (2015) Analyzing destination branding and image from online sources: a web content mining approach. J Bus Res 68(9):1836–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.011
Lapenta F (2012) Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In: Margolis E, Pauwels L (eds) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Sage, London, pp 201–213
Li J, Xu L, Tang L, Wang S, Li L (2018) Big data in tourism research: a literature review. Tour Manag 68:301–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.009
Liang X, Fan L, Loh PY, Liu Y, Tong S (2017) Happy travelers take big pictures: a psychological study with machine learning and big data. arXiv, Online. Retrieved 19 July 2019, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07584
Lister M (2019) 33 Mind-Boggling Instagram Stats & Facts for 2018. Retrieved 22 Mar 2019, from wordstream.com: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2017/04/20/instagram-statistics
Lobinger K (2016) ‘Creative’ and participatory visual approaches in audience research. In: Kubitschko S, Kaun A (eds) Innovative methods in media and communication research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_15
Lobinger K (2017) Visual research methods. In: Matthes J, Davis CS, Potter RF (eds) The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0265
Lobinger K, Mengis J (2019) Visuelle Methoden. Forschen mit Bildern - Erforschen von Bildern. In: Lobinger K (ed) Handbuch Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 597–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06738-0_22-1
Lobinger K, Brantner C (2020) Picture-sorting techniques: Card-Sorting and Q-sort as alternative and complementary approaches in visual social research. In Pauwels L & Mannay D (eds.) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Sage, London, pp 309–321
Loeffler TA (2004) A photo elicitation study of the meanings of outdoor adventure experiences. J Leis Res 36(4):536–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950035
Lu W, Stepchenkova S (2015) User-generated content as a research mode in tourism and hospitality applications: topics, methods, and software. J Hosp Mark Manag 24(2):119–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2014.907758
Ma Y, Xiang Z, Du Q, Fan W (2018) Effects of user-provided photos on hotel review helpfulness: an analytical approach with deep leaning. Int J Hosp Manag 71:120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.12.008
MacKay JK, Couldwell MC (2004) Using visitor-employed photography to investigate destination image. J Travel Res 42(4):390–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504263035
Malle BF (2011) Attribution theorie: how people make sense of behavior. In: Chadee D (ed) Theories in social psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 72–95
Marchiori E, Di Nardo C, Mariani MM, Cantoni L (2016) The co-creation process of the online image of an Italian world heritage site: The Sassi of Matera. In: Information and communication technologies in tourism. Springer, Cham, pp 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_10
Margolis E, Pauwels L (2011) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. SAGE, London
Mele E, Kerkhof P, Cantoni L (2021) Analyzing cultural tourism promotion on Instagram: a cross-cultural perspective. J Travel Tour Mark 38(3):326–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2021.1906382
Metro-Roland M (2009) Interpreting meaning: an application of Peircean semiotics to tourism. Tour Geograph 11(2):270–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680902827225
Müller GM (2007) What is visual communication? Past and future of an emerging field of communication research. Stud Commun Sci 7(2):7–34. https://doi.org/10.24434/%25x
Müller MG (2012) Iconography and iconology as a visualmethod and approach. In: Margolis E, Pauwels L (eds) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. SAGE, London, pp 283–297
Nöth W (2012) Visual semiotics: key features and application to picture ads. In: Margolis E, Pauwels L (eds) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. SAGE, London, pp 298–316
Noy C, Kohn A (2010) Mediating touristic dangerscapes: the semiotics of state travel warnings issued to Israeli tourists. J Tour Cult Change 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2010.517318
Nunez-Mir GC, Iannone BV, Pijanowski BC, Kong N, Fei S (2016) Automated content analysis: addressing the big literature challenge in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol Evol 7(11):1262–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12602
Packard J (2008) ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: the power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Vis Stud 23(1):63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908544
Panofsky E (1970) Meaning in the visual arts. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Parry KJ (2018) Quantitative content analysis of the visual. In: Pauwels L, Mannay D (eds) SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi. In press
Pauwels L (2012) An integrated conceptual framework for visual social research. In: Margolis E, Pauwels L (eds) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Sage, London, pp 3–23
Pauwels L, Mannay D (eds) (2019) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, London/New York/New Delhi
Peng Y (2017) When images meet codes: applying computer vision methods in communication research. Annual meeting of the international communication association (ICA), (Conference presentation), San Diego. Retrieved 23 July 2019, from https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/ica/ica17/index.php?cmd=Online+Program+View+Paper&selected_paper_id=1227587&PHPSESSID=5mvur8tnatf8nr0coiqpigcv87
Pennington WJ, Thomsen CR (2010) A semiotic model of destination representations applied to cultural and heritage tourism marketing. Scand J Hosp Tour 10(1):33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250903561895
Petersen T, Schwender C (eds) (2011) Die Entschlüsselung der Bilder: Methoden zur Erforschung visueller Kommunikation; ein Handbuch. Herbert von Halem, Köln
Picazo P, Moreno-Gil S (2019) Analysis of the projected image of tourism destinations on photographs: a literature review to prepare for the future. J Vacat Mark 25(1):3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766717736350
Pink S (2012) Advances in visual methodology. SAGE, London
Pratt ML (1992) Imperial eyes: travel writing and transculturation. Routledge, Abingdon
Prosser J, Schwartz D (1998) Photographs within the sociological research process. In: Prosser J (ed) Image-based research. Falmer, London, pp 115–130
Rose G (2016) Visual methodologies. An introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi/Singapore
Said WE (1979) Orientalism. Random House, New York
Santos MX, Trillo-Santamaría J-M (2017) Tourism and nation in Galicia (Spain). Tour Manag Perspect 22:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.03.006
Smith SP (2018) Instagram abroad: performance, consumption and colonial narrative in tourism. Postcolonial Stud 21(2):172–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2018.1461173
Smith K, Moriarty S, Barbatsis G, Kenney K (2005) Handbook of visual communication: theory, methods, and media. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
Stepchenkova S, Zhan F (2013) Visual destination images of Peru: comparative content analysis of DMO and user-generated photography. Tour Manag 36:590–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.08.006
Stepchenkova S, Kim H, Kirilenko A (2014) Cultural differences in pictorial destination images: Russia through the camera lenses of American and Korean tourists. J Travel Res 54(6):758–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514535849
Stephenson W (1935) Correlating persons instead of tests. J Pers 4(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1935.tb02022.x
Stephenson W (1953) The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Sternberg E (1997) The iconography of the tourism experience. Ann Tour Res 24(4):951–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00053-4
Taylor JG, Czarnowski KJ, Sexton NR, Flick S (1995) The importance of water to Rocky Mountain National Park visitors: an adaptation of visitor-employed photography to natural resources management. J Appl Recreat Res 20(1):61–85
Thurlow C, Jaworski A (2011) Tourism discourse: languages and banal globalization. Appl Linguist Rev 2:285–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239331.285
Trpkovski A, Vu QH, Li G, Wang H, Law R (2018) Automatic hotel photo quality assessment based on visual features. In: Information and communication technologies in tourism. Springer, Cham, pp 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72923-7_30
Urry J, Larsen J (2011) The tourist gaze 3.0. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles
van Atteveldt W, Peng T-Q (2018) When communication meets computation: opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in computational communication science. Commun Methods Meas 12(2–3):81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084
van Leeuwen T (2006) Semiotics and iconography. In: van Leeuwen T, Jewitt C (eds) Handbook of visual analysis. SAGE, London, pp 92–117
van Leeuwen T, Jewitt C (2006) Handbook of visual analysis. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi
Weade R, Ernst G (1990) Pictures of life in classrooms, and the search for metaphors to frame them. Theory Into Pract 29(2):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849009543444
Youn HS, Uzzell D (2016) The young generations’ conceptualisation of cultural tourism: colonial heritage attractions in South Korea. Asia Pac J Tour Res 21(12):1324–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2016.1175486
Zhang F, Zhou B, Ratti C, Liu Y (2019) Discovering place-informative scenes and objects using social media photos. R Soc Open Sci 6(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181375
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lobinger, K., Mele, E. (2021). Visual Methods and Visual Analysis in Tourism Research. In: Xiang, Z., Fuchs, M., Gretzel, U., Höpken, W. (eds) Handbook of e-Tourism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05324-6_54-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05324-6_54-1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05324-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05324-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences