Abstract
This chapter explores the meaning of functional independence and its importance in making accreditation decisions and conducting other external quality-assurance (EQA) review processes in higher-education institutions and their offerings. Specifically, the chapter will include sections on why, in an increasingly global market place, EQA organizations must be able to demonstrate functional independence from undue political/government influences and professional guilds through a careful structuring of their review and decision-making processes. The chapter will further explore how EQA organizations can ensure functional independence through the establishment of written policy statements that safeguard the independence of their (1) standards-setting activities; (2) decision-making activities; (3) review processes conducted by staff and on-site reviewers; and (4) policies and procedural practices established by the members of the decision-making body.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboul-Ela, B. (2016). Principle 4: Quality and government. In S. Uvalic-Trumbic (Ed.), The CIQG international quality principles: Toward a shared understanding of quality (p. 31). Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. https://www.chea.org/sites/default/files/pdf/Principles_Papers_Complete_web.pdf
Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (1998). CHEA recognition of accrediting organizations: Policy and procedures (revised June 2010). Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. https://www.chea.org/sites/default/files/other-content/Recognition-Policy-2010.pdf
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). Brussels: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf
International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. (2016). Guidelines of good practice. Barcelona: International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. http://www.inqaahe.org/sites/default/files/INQAAHE_GGP2016.pdf
International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. (2018). INQAAHE guidelines of good practice procedures manual 2018. Barcelona: International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. http://www.inqaahe.org/sites/default/files/GGP_ProceduresManual.pdf
AASCB International. (2018). Code of conduct and conflicts of interest policy.https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/policies/conflict-of-interest.ashx?la=en
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Programs. (2015). CACREP policy document (revised 2018). Alexandria: Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Programs. http://www.cacrep.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2016-Policy-Document-February-2018-revision.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bobby, C.L. (2019). The Importance of Safeguarding Functional Independence in External Quality Assurance Decision-Making Activities. In: Badran, A., Baydoun, E., Hillman, J.R. (eds) Major Challenges Facing Higher Education in the Arab World: Quality Assurance and Relevance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03774-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03774-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03773-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03774-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)