Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality assurance of quality assurance agencies from an Asian perspective: regulation, autonomy and accountability

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As quality guardians of higher education, quality assurance agencies are required to guarantee the credibility of the review process and to ensure the objectivity and transparency of their decisions and recommendations. These agencies are therefore expected to use a range of internal and external approaches to prove the quality of their review activities. Quality assurance agencies in Asia are attempting to enhance their quality capacity through several internal and external approaches. The purpose of this study is to explore internal and external quality assurance mechanisms used by quality assurance agencies in Asian nations, through an international survey of 17 APQN full members and their use of the International Network of Quality assurance Agencies in Higher Education and the Asia–Pacific Quality Network guidelines. The balance between external review and autonomy is discussed at the national and international levels. The challenges and strategies that Asian quality assurance agencies are facing and dealing with are presented as a conclusion at the end of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASEAN University Network (AUN). (2014a). Official website Retrieved December 18, 2014, from http://www.aunsec.org/qualityassurance_details.php?id=3.

  • ASEAN University Network (AUN). (2014b). ASEAN University network-quality assurance guidelines. Retrieved December 18, 2014, from http://www.aunsec.org/pdf/aunwebsite/01_AUNQAGuidelineManual.pdf.

  • Asia–Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2010). Chiba principles. Retrieved October 1, 2010, from http://www.apqn.org/.

  • Asia–Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2012a). Assessing quality in higher education: Electronic package for reviewers’ training. Shanghai: APQN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asia–Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2012b). Official website. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://www.apqn.org/.

  • Asia–Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2012c). Peer review of quality assurance Agencies. Unpublished.

  • Asia–Pacific Quality Network (APQN). (2014). Discussion paper on Asia Pacific quality register (APQR). Unpublished.

  • Blackmur, D. (2008a). A critical analysis of the INQAAHE guidelines of good practice for higher education quality assurance agencies. Higher Education, 56(6), 723–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmur, D. (2008b). Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?: The review of the Australian universities quality agency. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2013). Mutuality meets the market: analyzing changes in the control of quality assurance in United Kingdom higher education 1992–2012. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(4), 420–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderon, A. (2012). Massification continues to transform higher education. University World News, 2(237). Retrieved June 7, 2014 from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20120831155341147.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costes, N. et. al. (2012). First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies—lessons learned. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.enqualityassurance.eu/files/ENQA%20workshop%20report%2010.pdf.

  • Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). (2006). Recognition of accrediting organizations policy and procedures. Washington, DC: CHEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D. (2011). Governing quality. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. (2011). US accreditation: Meeting the challenges of accountability and student achievement. Evaluation in Higher Education, 5(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Association for Quality assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2005). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Helsinki: ENQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Association for Quality assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2010). First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies—lessons learned. Helsinki: ENQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Association for Quality assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2012). Internal quality assurance benchmark. Helsinki: ENQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Quality assurance Register for Higher Education (EQAR). (2013). EQAR at a glance. Retrieved March 16, 2014, from https://www.equalityassurancer.eu/about/introduction.html.

  • Ewell, P. (2008). US accreditation and the future of quality assurance. Washington, DC: CHEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germany Accreditation Council (GAC) (2010). Criteria for the accreditation of accreditation agencies. Retrieved November 11, 2010, from http://www.akkreditierungsrat.de/index.php?id=44&L=1.

  • Hawkins, D., et al. (2006). Delegation and agency in international organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, A. Y. C. (2014). Quality in cross-border higher education and challenges for the internationalization of national quality assurance agencies in the Asia–Pacific region–Taiwan experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, A. Y. C., Morse, R., Ince, M., Chen, H. J., Chiang, C. L., & Chan, Y. (2015). Is the Asian quality assurance system for higher education going glonacal?: Assessing the impact of three types of program accreditation on Taiwanese universities. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Network for Quality assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). (2009). Guidelines of good practice in quality assurance. Retrieved December 1, 2009, from http://www.inqualityassuranceahe.org/main/capacity-building-39/guidelines-of-good-practice-51.

  • International Network for Quality assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). (2010). INQAAHE review report: Sistema nacional de acreditacion de la educacion superior (SINAES). Retrieved November 10, 2011, from http://www.inqualityassuranceahe.org/main/capacity-building-39/review/inqualityassuranceahe-review-reports.

  • International Network for Quality assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). (2013a). Quality glossary. Retrieved January 26, 2013, from http://www.apqn.org/.

  • International Network for Quality assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). (2013b). GGP aligned agencies. Retrieved January 26, 2013, from http://www.apqn.org/.

  • King, R. (2009). Governing universities globally. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Llavori, R. (2010). Self-assessment of agencies and self-assessment report: an agency perspective—the case of the National Agency for Quality Assessment and Accreditation of Spain (ANECA). European Association for Quality assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 14–16. First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies-lessons learned. Helsinki: ENQA.

  • Marcos, S. (2012). Learning from each other-using benchmarking to develop Internal quality assurance, European Association for Quality assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), (Internal quality assurance benchmarking) (pp. 13–16). Helsinki: ENQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., Kaur, S., & Sawir, E. (2011). Global, local, national in the Asia–Pacific. In Marginson S. Kaur & E. Sawir (Eds.), Higher Education in the Asia–Pacific (pp. 3–34). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., & Stella, A. (2007). External quality assurance in higher education: making choices. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation (NIAD-UE). (2007). Glossary of quality assurance in Japanese higher education. Tokyo: NIAD-UE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stella, A. (2010). The Chiba principles: A survey analysis on the developments in the APQN membership. Shanghai: Asia–Pacific Quality Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szanto, T. (2010). Background and purposes of external reviews of quality assurance agencies: ENQA membership, national purposes. European Association for Quality assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies-lessons learned. Helsinki: ENQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroeijenstijn, T. (2008). Internal and external quality assurance—Why are they two sides of the same coin? Retrieved March 31, 2012, from http://www.eahep.org/web/images/Bangkok/28_panel_ton.pdf.

  • WASC. (2008). Handbook of accreditation 2008. Alameda: WASC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D. F. et al. (2010). The Bologna process independent assessment: The first decade of working on the European higher education area. Retrieved July 16, 2014, http://www.doc/bologna_process/independent/_assessment_l_detailed_rept.pdf.

  • Woodhouse, D. (2004). The quality of quality assurance agencies. Quality in Higher Education, 10(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, D. (2007). Quality of quality assurance agencies, 1–7. Retrieved December 10, 2011, from http://www.inqualityassuranceahe.org/Upload/Presentations/AsiaPacificQualityNetworkAnnualConferenceFebruary2007.doc.

  • Woodhouse, D. (2010). Internationalization of quality assurance: The role played by the networks. Retrieved February 15, 2011 from http://www.auqualityassurance.edu.au/files/presentations/internationalisatioofqualityassurancetheroleplayedbythenetworks.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Educational Leadership and Development, Fu Jen Catholic University, 510, Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang City, Taipei County, 24205, Taiwan, ROC

    Angela Yung-Chi Hou

  2. Office of International Education, Fu Jen Catholic University, 510, Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang City, Taipei County, 24205, Taiwan, ROC

    Angela Yung-Chi Hou

  3. Martin Ince Communications Limited, London, UK

    Martin Ince

  4. Fu Jen Catholic University, Sinjhuang City, Taipei County, Taiwan, ROC

    Sandy Tsai & Chung Lin Chiang

Authors
  1. Angela Yung-Chi Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Ince
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sandy Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chung Lin Chiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Yung-Chi Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, A.YC., Ince, M., Tsai, S. et al. Quality assurance of quality assurance agencies from an Asian perspective: regulation, autonomy and accountability. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 16, 95–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9358-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9358-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation