Skip to main content

Practical Wisdom in the Recovery of Virtue Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Practical Wisdom in Business and Management

Abstract

After the publication of Anscombe’s essay Modern Moral Philosophy in 1958, virtue ethics has experienced a philosophical revival. This chapter examines the similarities and differences regarding the understanding of the virtue of practical wisdom by the main authors who followed the wave that Anscombe set in motion in this “recovery of virtue ethics.” After reviewing the perspectives on practical wisdom of Anscombe, Foot, Hursthouse, Annas, and Russell, the chapter focuses on the elaborations of Alasdair MacIntyre and the Catholic Social Teaching. Finally, it explores how the concept of practical wisdom in the tradition of virtue ethics is challenged by new technologies and reviews Vallor’s concept of technomoral wisdom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbà, G. (1996). Quale impostazione per la filosofia morale? Ricerche di filosofia morale. Roma: LAS, Libreria Ateneo Salesiano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (1993). The morality of happiness. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195096525.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (1995). Prudence and morality in ancient and modern ethics. Ethics, 105(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1086/293699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (2015). Book forum on intelligent virtue, Oxford University Press, 2014 by Julia Annas: Précis of intelligent virtue. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 49(1–2), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-015-9483-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1979). Thought and action in Aristotle. In R. Bambrough (Ed.), New essays on Plato and Aristotle (Reprint., pp. 143–158). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1989). Von Wright on practical inference. In P. A. Schilpp & L. E. Hahn (Eds.), The philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (pp. 377–404). La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1993). On wisdom. Acta Philosophica, 2(1), 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1964). Summa theologiae: Latin text and English translation, introductions, notes, appendices, and glossaries (T. Gilby, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Blackfriars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation. Vol. 2 (J. Barnes, Ed.) (6th ed.). Princeton University Press. Accessed 23 Mar 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beabout, G. R. (2017). Practical wisdom, practices, and institutions. In A. J. G. Sison, G. R. Beabout, & I. Ferrero (Eds.), Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management (pp. 69–78). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6510-8_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. (2009). Encyclical letter Caritas in Veritate. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. (2010). Message of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI for the celebration of the World Day of Peace. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20091208_xliii-world-day-peace.html

  • Bernacchio, C., & Couch, R. (2015). The virtue of participatory governance: A MacIntyrean alternative to shareholder maximization. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24, S130–S143. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catechism of the Catholic Church. (1993). Catechism of the Catholic Church. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1986). Instruction on Christian freedom and liberation. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19860322_freedom-liberation_en.html

  • Cornuel, E., Habisch, A., & Kletz, P. (2010). The practical wisdom of the Catholic social teachings. Journal of Management Development, 29(7/8), 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011059185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremaschi, S. (2010). Elizabeth Anscombe e la svolta normativa del 1958. In J. A. Mercado (Ed.), Elizabeth Anscombe e il rinnovamento della psicologia morale (pp. 43–80). Roma: Armando Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremaschi, S. (2012). Anscombe on consequentialism and absolute prohibitions. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 47(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300_0470102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (2001). Natural goodness. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198235089.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (2002). Virtues and vices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252866.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Review of Philosophy. (2003). The grammar of goodness. An interview with Philippa Foot. XI, 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. (2006). Practical Wisdom: A Mundane Account. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106(1), 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2018). Virtue ethics. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue

  • John Paul II. (1987). Encyclical letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis.html

  • John Paul II. (1991). Encyclical letter Centesimus Annus. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II. (1993). Encyclical letter Veritatis Splendor. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1966). A short history of ethics. A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric age to the twentieth century. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1990). First principles, final ends, and contemporary philosophical issues. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1994). A partial response to my critics. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre: Critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre (pp. 283–304). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1998a). Plain persons and moral philosophy: Rules, virtues and goods. In K. Knight (Ed.), The MacIntyre reader (pp. 136–152). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1998b). Practical rationalities as forms of social structure. In K. Knight (Ed.), The MacIntyre reader (pp. 120–135). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2016). Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2010). Practical wisdom in managerial decision making. Journal of Management Development, 29(7/8), 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011059068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melina, L. (2006). Una luz para el obrar: experiencia moral, caridad y acción cristiana. Madrid: Ediciones Palabra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercado, J. A. (2018). How close are contemporary ideas on human flourishing and the classical philosophy of man? In J. A. Mercado (Ed.), Personal flourishing in organizations (pp. 11–35). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57702-9_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, J. (1990). The four cardinal virtues: Human agency, intellectual traditions, and responsible knowledge. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, J. (1991). A brief reader on the virtues of the human heart. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (Ed.). (2004). Compendium of the social doctrine of the Church. Cittá del Vaticano/Washington, DC: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Distributed by] United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhonheimer, M. (2013). The perspective of morality: Philosophical foundations of Thomistic virtue ethics. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Luño, A. (Ed.). (2008). Scelti in Cristo per essere santi (Vol. III). Roma: EDUSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez Luño, A., & Belloq, A. (2014). Ética General (7th ed.). Pamplona: EUNSA. Accessed 23 Jan 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. C. (2009). Practical intelligence and the virtues. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G., Beabout, G. R., & Ferrero, I. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management (1st ed., Vols. 1–2). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G., Ferrero, I., & Guitián, G. (2018). Virtues and the common good in business. In A. J. G. Sison, I. Ferrero, & G. Guitián (Eds.), Business ethics: A virtue ethics and common good approach (pp. 1–23). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, N. E. (2017). Neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics (N. E. Snow, Ed.) (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199385195.013.34.

  • Torralba, J. M. (2005). Acción Intencional y Razonamiento Práctico Según G.E.M. Anscombe. Pamplona: EUNSA, Editorial Universidad Navarra, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vallor, S. (2017). AI and the automation of wisdom. In T. M. Powers (Ed.), Philosophy and computing (Vol. 128, pp. 161–178). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61043-6_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S. (2015). Prudenza. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Rocchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rocchi, M., Redín, D.M., Ferrero, I. (2020). Practical Wisdom in the Recovery of Virtue Ethics. In: Schwartz, B., Bernacchio, C., González-Cantón, C., Robson, A. (eds) Handbook of Practical Wisdom in Business and Management. International Handbooks in Business Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00140-7_11-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00140-7_11-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00140-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00140-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics