Abstract
The design of complex systems requires communication between several teams of people or “disciplines” responsible for the various, interdependent subsystems contained within the system. In this paper, we build on current Design Structure Matrix techniques for representing communication. These techniques only allow for bilateral and static communication to be seen. We are able to the capability this tool to include multilateral communication as well as changes in communication over time. By collecting communication data from a concurrent design facility, we are able to provide an example of the context in which these tools can be used as well as several insights gained from our observations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pimmler, T. U., & Eppinger, S. D. (1994). Integration analysis of product decompositions. In Proceeding of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference. Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved February 15, 2018, from https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/2514/1/SWP-3690-30681755.pdf
Suh, E. S., De Weck, O. L., & Chang, D. (2007). Flexible product platforms: Framework and case study. Research in Engineering Design, 18(2), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-007-0032-z
Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., & Rowles, C. M. (2003). Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 125(2), 240. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1564074
Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., & Rowles, C. M. (2004). The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Science, 50(12), 1674–1689. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0289
Feng, W., Crawley, E. F., de Weck, O., Keller, R., & Robinson, B. (2010). Dependency structure matrix modelling for stakeholder value networks. In Proceedings of the 12th International DSM Conference (pp. 3–16). Cambridge.
Browning, T. R. (1998). Integrative mechanisms for multiteam integration: Findings from five case studies. Systems Engineering, 1(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1998)1:2<95::AID-SYS1>3.0.CO;2-3
Eppinger, S. D., & Browning, T. R. (2012). Design structure matrix methods and applications. MIT Press http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpDSMMA003/design-structure-matrix/design-structure-matrix
Batallas, D. A., & Yassine, A. A. (2006). Information leaders in product development organizational networks: Social network analysis of the design structure matrix. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.883706
Browning, T. R. (2001). Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.946528
Gokpinar, B., Hopp, W. J., Iravani, S. M. R., & Ross, S. M. (2010). The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality in complex product development. Management Science, 56(3), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.l090.1117
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant CMMI—1563408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Forsythe, C., Joseph, N., Szajnfarber, Z., Gralla, E. (2019). Visualizing Communication Patterns in Design Teams Over Time. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00113-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00114-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)