Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Insecticidal Efficacy of Wild Type and Recombinant Baculoviruses

  • Protocol
Baculovirus and Insect Cell Expression Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1350))

Abstract

A considerable amount of work has been undertaken to genetically enhance the efficacy of baculovirus insecticides. Following construction of a genetically altered baculovirus, laboratory bioassays are used to quantify various parameters of insecticidal activity such as the median lethal concentration (or dose) required to kill 50 % of infected larvae (LC50 or LD50), median survival of larvae infected (ST50), and feeding damage incurred by infected larvae. In this chapter, protocols are described for a variety of bioassays and the corresponding data analyses for assessment of the insecticidal activity of baculovirus insecticides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harrison R, Bonning B (2001) Use of proteases to improve the insecticidal activity of baculoviruses. Biol Control 20:199–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamita S, Kang K, Hammock B et al (2005) Genetically modified baculoviruses for pest insect control. In: Gilbert L, Iatrou K, Gill S (eds) Comprehensive molecular insect science, vol 6, Elsevier. Oxford, UK, pp 271–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. McCutchen B, Hoover K, Preisler H et al (1997) Interactions of recombinant and wild-type baculoviruses with classical insecticides and pyrethroid-resistant tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 90:1170–1180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Popham H, Li Y, Miller L (1997) Genetic improvement of Helicoverpa zea nuclear polyhedrosis virus as a biopesticide. Biol Control 10:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prikhod'ko G, Popham H, Felcetto T et al (1998) Effects of simultaneous expression of two sodium channel toxin genes on the properties of baculoviruses as biopesticides. Biol Control 12:66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes P, Van Beek N, Wood H (1986) A modified droplet feeding method for rapid assay of Bacillus thuringiensis and baculoviruses in noctuid larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 48:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. SAS Institute (2003) SAS users guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer F, Ellersieck M, Asfaw A (2009) Risk assessment tools: software and user’s guide. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Pensacola, FL, p 84

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoover K, Schultz C, Lane S et al (1997) Effects of diet-Age and streptomycin on virulence of Autographa californica M nucleopolyhedrovirus against the tobacco budworm. J Invertebr Pathol 69:46–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Washburn J, Kirkpatrick B, Volkman L (1995) Comparative pathogenesis of Autographa californica M nuclear polyhedrosis virus in larvae of Trichoplusia ni and Heliothis virescens. Virology 209:561–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonning B, Hoover K, Duffey S et al (1995) Production of polyhedra of the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus using the Sf21 and Tn5B1-4 cell lines and comparison with host-derived polyhedra by bioassay. J Invertebr Pathol 66:224–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lua L, Pedrini M, Reid S et al (2002) Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus serially passaged in cell culture. J Gen Virol 83:945–955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pijlman G, Van Den Born E, Martens D et al (2001) Autographa californica baculoviruses with large genomic deletions are rapidly generated in infected insect cells. Virology 283:132–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes P, Wood H (1981) A synchronous peroral technique for the bioassay of insect viruses. J Invertebr Pathol 37:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrison R, Popham H, Breitenbach J et al (2012) Genetic variation and virulence of Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus and Trichoplusia ni single nucleopolyhedrovirus isolates. J Invertebr Pathol 110:33–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Beek N, Hughes P (1986) Determination by fluorescence spectroscopy of the volume ingested by neonate lepidopterous larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 48:249–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li H, Sparks W, Bonning B (2008) Protocols for microapplicator-assisted infection of lepidopteran larvae with baculovirus. J Vis Exp 18:889

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Beek N, Hughes P (1998) The response time of insect larvae infected with recombinant baculoviruses. J Invertebr Pathol 72:338–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wood H, Hughes P, Shelton A (1994) Field studies of the co-occlusion strategy with a genetically altered isolate of the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Environ Entomol 23:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wood HA, Trotter KM, Davis TR, Hughes PR (1993) Per os infectivity of preoccluded virions from polyhedrin-minus recombinant baculoviruses. J Invertebr Pathol 62:64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoover K, Schultz C, Lane S et al (1995) Reduction in damage to cotton plants by a recombinant baculovirus that knocks moribund larvae of Heliothis virescens off the plant. Biol Control 5:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Finney D (1978) Statistical method in biological assay, 3rd edn. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stokes M, Davis C, Koch G (2002) Categorical data analysis using the SAS system, 2nd edn. SAS Institute., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fieller E (1940) The biological standardization of insulin. J R Stat Soc 7(Suppl):1–64

    Google Scholar 

  25. Read C (1983) Fieller’s theorem. In: Kotz S, Johnson N (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical science, vol 3. Wiley, New York, pp 86–88

    Google Scholar 

  26. Collett D (1991) Modeling binary data. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Zerbe G (1978) On Fieller’s theorem and the general linear model. Am Stat 32:103–105

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan E, Meier P (1959) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Collett D (1994) Modeling survival data in medical research. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee E (1992) Statistical methods for survival data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mayer F, Ellersieck M, Krause G et al (2002) Time-concentration effect models in predicting chronic toxicity from acute data. In: Crane M, Newman M, Chapman P et al (eds) Risk assessment with time to event models. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 39–67

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sun K, Krause G, Mayer F et al (1995) Predicting chronic lethality of chemicals to fishes from acute toxicity test data: theory of accelerated life testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1745–1752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Loy Volkman and Jan Washburn for training HL in accurate staging of larvae and use of the microapplicator and Steve Cooper for his assistance with photography. This material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, US Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2003-35302-13558 as well as Hatch Act and State of Iowa funds. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly J. R. Popham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Popham, H.J.R., Ellersieck, M.R., Li, H., Bonning, B.C. (2016). Evaluation of the Insecticidal Efficacy of Wild Type and Recombinant Baculoviruses. In: Murhammer, D. (eds) Baculovirus and Insect Cell Expression Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1350. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3043-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3043-2_21

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3042-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3043-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics