Skip to main content

Marriage as an Intervention in the Lives of Criminal Offenders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Effective Interventions in the Lives of Criminal Offenders

Abstract

Criminology has long been interested in identifying evidence-based interventions that can help redirect criminal pathways. Although not within the purview of the criminal justice system, other nontraditional interventions have also emerged as generally effective desistance-promoting factors. One intervention in particular, marriage, is the focus of this chapter. Herein, we provide a brief overview of some of the main theoretical frameworks that have articulated a “marriage effect” of criminal desistance. Then, we provide a detailed review of the empirical literature assessing the relationship between marriage and crime. The chapter closes by offering summary conclusions as well as highlighting several directions for future research. Identifying the correlates of criminal desistance is important for theory—but is especially important for public policy (Laub and Sampson 2001). To the extent that aspects of offenders’ lives that influence continued offending can be identified and addressed, then evidence-based policies and programs can target at-risk offenders with the hope of helping to foster and/or aid in the desistance process (see Sherman et al. 2002).

One particular correlate that has received much theoretical and empirical attention, though not routinely considered a criminal-justice-applied intervention, is marriage. The relationship of marriage to criminal desistance has long been recognized in the criminological literature and resonates well with many criminological frameworks—especially control theories of crime that focus on the accumulated bonds that prevent persons from offending.

This chapter provides a brief overview of some of the main theoretical frameworks that have articulated a “marriage effect” of criminal desistance. This is followed by a review of the empirical literature assessing the relationship between marriage and crime. Summary conclusions and directions for future research complete the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Of course, the “marriage effect” literature is mainly concentrated with the effect on marriage on desistance from crime. Recognizing the problems associated with measuring desistance (see Bushway et al. 2001; Laub and Sampson 2001), we consider more generally the role that marriage plays in reducing subsequent offending.

References

  • Barnes, J. C., & Beaver, K. M. (2012). Marriage and desistance from crime: A consideration of gene-environment correlation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. C., Golden, K., Mancini, C., Boutwell, B. B., Beaver, K. M., & Diamond, B. (2011). Marriage and involvement in crime: A consideration of reciprocal effects in a nationally representative sample. Justice Quarterly. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.641577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., DeLisi, M., & Vaughn, M. G. (2008). Desistance from delinquency: The marriage effect revisited and extended. Social Science Research, 37, 736–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, B.E. & Doherty, E.E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: Examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51, 399–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokland, A. A. J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology, 43, 1203–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broidy, L. M., & Caufmann, E. E. (2006). Understanding the female offender. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, S. A., Donnellan, M. B., Humbad, M. N., Hicks, B. M., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2010). Does marriage inhibit antisocial behavior? An examination of selection vs. causation via a longitudinal twin design. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(12), 1309–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushway, S. D., Piquero, A. R., Broidy, L. M., Cauffman, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology, 39, 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1988). Sociology of marriage and the family: Gender, love and property. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J., & Foster, H. (2013). Desistance in the transition to adulthood: The roles of marriage, military, and gender. Deviant Behavior, 34, 208–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, L. E., Beaver, K. M., & Hartman, J. L. (2008). A life-course approach to the study of victimization and offending behaviors. Victims and Offenders, 3, 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, E. E. (2006). Self-control, social bonds, and desistance: A test of life-course interdependence. Criminology, 44, 807–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, E. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (2013). Marriage and offending among a cohort of disadvantaged African Americans. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 104–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1995). Effects of marriage, separation, and children on offending by adult males. Current Perspectives on Aging and the Life Cycle, 4, 249–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, W. (2007). Adult family relationships and desistance from crime. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, W., & Hay, C. (2011). Life-course transitions, self-control, and desistance from crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11, 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Holland, D. D. (2003). Changes in friendship relations over the life course: Implications for desistance from crime. Criminology, 41(2), 293–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1995). Control theory and life-course perspective. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 4, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. D., Massoglia, M., & MacMillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45, 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Good marriages and trajectories of change in criminal offending. American Sociological Review, 63, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters in the study of crime. Criminology, 31(3), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research. Vol. 28 (pp. 1–69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyngstad, T. H., & Skardhamar, T. (2013). Changes in criminal offending around the time of marriage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0022427812469516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maume, M. O., Ousey, G. C., & Beaver, K. (2005). Cutting the grass: A reexamination of the link between marital attachment, delinquent peers, and desistance from marijuana use. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 27–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., Piquero, A. R., Blokland, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2011). Marriage and offending specialization: Expanding the impact of turning points and the process of desistance. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, D. J. (2003). Investigating latent trait and life course theories as predictors of recidivism among an offender sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Haapanen, R. (2002). Crime in emerging adulthood. Criminology, 40, 137–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., MacDonald, J. M., & Parker, K. F. (2002). Race, local life circumstances, and criminal activity. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 654–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. R., & Purser, C. W. (2010). Social disorganization, marriage, and reported crime: A spatial econometrics examination of family formation and criminal offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 942–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhule-Louie, D. M., & McMahon, R. J. (2007). Problem behavior and romantic relationships: Assortative mating, behavior contagion, and desistance. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10(1), 53–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. C., & Farrington, D. P. (1997). The familial transmission of criminal convictions. Criminology, 35, 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44, 465–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L., Johnson, C. C., Beaman, J., & Conger, R. D. (1993). Explaining women’s double jeopardy: Factors that mediate the association between harsh treatment as a child and violence by a husband. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 713–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L., Stewart, E., Gordon, L. C., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2002). A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology, 40(2), 401–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Effects of getting married on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 496–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Why do the crime-reducing effects of marriage vary with age? British Journal of Criminology, 51, 136–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schellen, M., Apel, R., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). “Because you’re mine, I walk the line”? Marriage, spousal criminality, and criminal offending over the life course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 701–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zoutewelle-Terovan, M., van der Geest, V., Liefbroer, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2012). Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behavior for men and women. Crime and Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128712441745.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex R. Piquero Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Craig, J.M., Diamond, B., Piquero, A.R. (2014). Marriage as an Intervention in the Lives of Criminal Offenders. In: Humphrey, J., Cordella, P. (eds) Effective Interventions in the Lives of Criminal Offenders. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8930-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics