Skip to main content

Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients: An Overview

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Diet and Nutrition in Critical Care

Abstract

Diet and nutrient factors act as pro- and antitumor risk modifiers across the entire complex process of tumorigenesis. Among all the recognized oncogens, diet is one of the modifiable risk factors. Patients with malignancy are most likely to suffer from malnutrition. The mechanisms of malnutrition in this setting are multifactorial. Nutrition screening is an important component of nutrition therapy, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and enteral nutrition (EN) may help in preventing further deterioration of nutritional state and sometimes improve metabolic indices in cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CCS:

Cancer cachexia syndrome

EN:

Enteral nutrition

NRI:

Nutrition Risk Index

PG-SGA:

Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment

PN:

Parenteral nutrition

SGA:

Subjective Global Assessment

TPN:

Total parenteral nutrition

References

  • American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(1 suppl):1SA–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anis M, Abid S, Jafri W, et al. Acceptability and outcomes of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement – patients’ and care givers’ perspectives. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006;6:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arends J, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: non-surgical oncology. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(2):245–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Argiles JM, Alvarez B, Lopez-Soriano FJ. The metabolic basis of cancer cachexia. Med Res Rev. 1997;17:477–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • August DA, Huhmann MB. ASPEN clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33(5):472–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera R. Nutritional support in cancer patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(5 suppl):S63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J, Capra S. Comparison of a malnutrition screening tool with subjective global assessment in hospitalised patients with cancer – sensitivity and specificity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12:257–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M. Use of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56:779–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzetti F. Review: effects of artificial nutrition on the nutritional status of cancer patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1989;13:406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzetti F. Rationale and indications for preoperative feeding of malnourished surgical cancer patients. Nutrition. 2002;18(11–12):953–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzetti F, et al. Artificial nutrition in cancer patients: which route, what composition? World J Surg. 1999;23(6):577–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt ME, Gorschboth CM, Brennan MF. A controlled, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the metabolic effects of enteral and parenteral nutrition in the cancer patients. Cancer. 1982;49:1092–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capra S, Ferguson M, Ried K. Cancer: impact of nutrition intervention outcome – nutrition issues for patients. Nutrition. 2001;17(9):769–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerantola Y, Hubner M, Grass F, et al. Immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(1):37–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerra FB, Lehman S, Konstantinides N, et al. Effect of enteral nutrient on in vitro tests of immune function in ICU patients: a preliminary report. Nutrition. 1990;6:84–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charney P, Cranganu A. The ASPEN core curriculum: a case-based approach - the adult patient. In: Gottschlich MM (Ed), Cancer, Silver Spring, MD. 2007;21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consensus recommendations from the U.S. summit on immune-enhancing enteral therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001;25:S61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranganu A, Camporeale J. Nutrition aspects of lung cancer. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24(6):688–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demark-Wahnefried W, Peterson BL, Winer EP, et al. Changes in weight, body composition, and factors influencing energy balance among premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(9):2381–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewys, William D, et al. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior tochemotherapy in cancer patients. The American J Med. 1980;69(4):491–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drover JW, Dhaliwal R, Weitzel L, et al. Perioperative use of arginine-supplemented diets: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(3):385–99, 399 e381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esper DH, Harb WA. The cancer cachexia syndrome: a review of metabolic and clinical manifestations. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20(4):369–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gadea E, Thivat E, Planchat E, Morio B, Durando X. Importance of metabolic changes induced by chemotherapy on prognosis of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review of potential mechanisms. Obes Rev. 2012;13(4):368–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heslin MJ, Latkany L, Leung D, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Ann Surg. 1997;226(4):567–77; discussion 577–580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heys SD, Ogston K, Miller I, et al. Potentiation of the response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer by dietary supplementation with L-arginine: results of a randomised controlled trial. Int J Oncol. 1998;12:221–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heys SD, et al. Enteral nutritional supplementation with key nutrients in patients with critical illness and cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Ann Surg. 1999;229(4):467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hong JH, Omur-Ozbek P, Stanek BT, et al. Taste and odor abnormalities in cancer patients. J Support Oncol. 2009;7:58–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huhmann MB, August DA. Review of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines for nutrition support in cancer patients: nutrition screening and assessment. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23(2):182–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huhmann MB, August D. Perioperative nutrition support in cancer patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(5):586–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeevanandam M, Legaspi A, Lowry SF, et al. Effect of total parenteral nutrition on whole body protein kinetics in cachectic patients with benign or malignant disease. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1988;12:229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman TO. Grains or veins: is enteral nutrition really better than parenteral nutrition? A look at the evidence. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22(3):167–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale RG, Vanek VW, et al. The A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: society of critical care medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2009;33(3):277–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: society of critical care medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33(3):277–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Paige E, Snyder D. Phytochemicals and cancer risk a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(5):599–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen NP, North D, Smith HJ, et al. Safety and effectiveness of prophylactic gastrostomy tubes for head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. Surg Oncol. 2006;15(4):199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne JB, et al. The experience of head and neck cancer patients with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube at a Canadian cancer center. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(5):661–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ottery FD. Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition. 1996;12:S15–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition Cooperative Study Group. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(8):525–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plata-Salaman CR. Central nervous system mechanisms contributing to the cachexia-anorexia syndrome. Nutrition. 2000;16:1009–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, Mattox T. The ASPEN core curriculum: a case-based approach – the adult patient. In: Gottschlich MM, editor. Cancer. Silver Spring: American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition; 2007. p. 649–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szeluga DJ, Stuart RK, Brookmeyer R, et al. Nutritional support of bone marrow transplant recipients: prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing total parenteral nutrition to an enteral feeding program. Cancer Res. 1987;47(12):3309–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson CA. Diet and breast cancer understanding risks and benefits. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(5):636–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waitzberg DL, Saito H, Plank LD, et al. Postsurgical infections are reduced with specialized nutrition support. World J Surg. 2006;30(8):1592–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren S. The immediate cause of death in cancer. Am J Med Sci. 1932;185:610–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisdorf SA, Lysne J, Wind D, et al. Positive effect of prophylactic total parenteral nutrition on long-term outcome of bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation. 1987;43(6):833–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avani Changela .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Changela, A., Davanos, E., Javaiya, H. (2015). Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients: An Overview. In: Rajendram, R., Preedy, V.R., Patel, V.B. (eds) Diet and Nutrition in Critical Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7836-2_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7836-2_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7837-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7836-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics