Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial Nutrition in Cancer Patients: Which Route, What Composition?

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The state of art of artificial nutrition in depleted cancer patients is reviewed in brief. Because cancer cachexia cannot be equated to simple nutrient deficiency but is due instead to complex metabolic abnormalities, the nutritional effects of total parenteral (TPN) and enteral (EN) nutrition are more limited than in starving subjects. TPN and EN usually prevent further deterioration of the nutritional status, although they are not able to fully reverse a state of depletion. There is evidence that quantitative and qualitative modulation of certain nutrients may obtain better results because of a favorable impact on host metabolism. Research in this field is fully warranted. Moreover, the effects of some substrates on tumor metabolism and tumor growth require further investigation to define a nutritional regimen able to maintain the host metabolism with minimum stimulation of tumor growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bozzetti, F., Gavazzi, C., Mariani, L. et al. Artificial Nutrition in Cancer Patients: Which Route, What Composition?. World J. Surg. 23, 577–583 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012350

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012350

Keywords

Navigation