Skip to main content

Game Theory and the Practice of Bargaining

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Game Theory and Business Applications

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 194))

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the models of bargaining, both cooperative and non-cooperative, that have appeared in the literature, with a view to understanding what insights these models might have for practitioners. The main conclusion is that the models help us tailor our strategies to specific features of the environment in which bargaining takes place. Bargaining powe is related to these features of the environment and the institutional nature of the bargaining.

This chapter is a revised and updated version of my earlier paper, “Game Theory and the Practice of Bargaining,” which originally appeared in Group Decision and Negotiation, 1995. The revision has greatly benefited from detailed comments by William Samuelson. I apologize to the reader for the numerous references to my own work. Because I have not attempted a general survey of the literature; it is probably inevitable that this discussion is biased toward current topics in which I’ve been particularly involved and interested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, D., & Gul, F. (2000). Bargaining and reputation. Econometrica, 68(1), 85–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Admati, A. and Perry, M. (1987). Strategic delay in bargaining, Review of Economic Studies, LIV, 345–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R., & Brandenburger, A. (1995). Epistemic conditions for nash equilibrium. Econometrica, 63, 1161–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, A. (2002). Sequencing strategically: Wage negotiations under oligopoly. In: International Journal of Industrial Organization. Delhi: Mimeo, Delhi School of Economics, 20(7), 1037–1058

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1985). Bargaining and coalitions. In A. E. Roth (Ed.), Game-theoretic models of bargaining. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A., & Wolinsky, A. (1986). The nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K., Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1988). An outside option experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 753–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K., Piccione, M., & Samuelson, L. (1998). Evolutionary stability of alternating offers bargaining games. Journal of Economic Theory, 80, 257–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E., & Chatterjee, K. (1996). Coalition formation, communication and coordination: An exploratory experiment. In R. Zeckhauser, R. Keeney, & J. Sebenius (Eds.), Wise choices: Games, decisions and negotiations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G., Chatterjee, K., & McGinn, K. (2003). How communication links influence coalitional bargaining. Management Science, 49, 583–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Dutta, B. (1998). Rubinstein auctions: On competition for bargaining partners. Games and Economic Behavior, 23, 119–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Lee, C. C. (1998). Bargaining with incomplete information about outside options. Games and Economic Behavior, 22, 203–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Sabourian, H. (2000). Multiperson bargaining and strategic complexity. Econometrica, 68, 1491–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Samuelson, W. (1983). Bargaining under incomplete information. Operations Research, 31, 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Samuelson, L. (1987). Bargaining with two-sided incomplete information: An infinite horizon model with alternating offers. Review of Economic Studies, 54, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Samuelson, L. (1990). Perfect equilibria in simultaneous offers bargaining. International Journal of Game Theory, 19, 237–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., Dutta, B., Ray, D., & Sengupta, K. (1993). A non-cooperative theory of coalitional bargaining. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Kim, N. (1999). Strategic choice of bargaining order with one-sided incomplete information. Draft manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., & Chiu, Y. W. (1999). When does competition lead to efficient investments? Draft manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikte, S. D., & Deshmukh, S. D. (1987). The role of external search in bilateral bargaining. Operations Research, 35, 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. (1989). You can negotiate anything. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P. C. (1992). Strategic delay in bargaining under two-sided uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 59, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meza, D., & Lockwood, B. (1998). Investment, asset ownership and matching the property rights theory of the firm in market equilibrium. Mimeo, Universities of Exeter and Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. A. (1989). Sequential bargaining with correlated values. Review of Economic Studies, 56, 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., & Gibbons, R. (1989). Cheap talk can matter in bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory, 48, 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., Levine, D., & Tirole, J. (1985). Infinite horizon models of bargaining with one-sided incomplete information. In A. E. Roth (Ed.), Game theoretic models of bargaining. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1956). Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games: A critical discussion of Zeuthen’s, Hicks’s and Nash’s theories. Econometrica, 24, 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and market structure. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1119–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. (1991). Game theory and economic modelling. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, V. (1992). Learning in games with strategic complementarities. Boston: Mimeo Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax, D., & Sebenius, J. (1986). The manager as negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. C. (1994). Bargaining and search with recall. Operations Research, 42, 1100–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. C., & Merlo, A. (2004). Pattern bargaining. Mimeo Pennsylvania State University and the University of Minnesota. International Economic Review, 45(1), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). Rationalizability, learning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica, 58, 1255–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthoo, A. (1990). Bargaining without commitment. Games and Economic Behavior, 2, 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. (1977). Graphs and cooperation in games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2, 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. (1981). Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R., & Satterthwaite, M. (1983). Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1974). The ‘Corroboration’ of theories. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (1953). Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. In H. Kuhn & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (1992). Economics – mathematical politics or science of diminishing returns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenschein, J., & Zlotkin, G. (1994). Rules of encounter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E. (1979). Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1982), Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica, 50(1), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W. (1984). Bargaining under asymmetric information. Econometrica, 52, 995–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius, J. (1992). Negotiation analysis. Management Science, 38, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1981). A noncooperative model of characteristic function bargaining. In: Models of strategic rationality (selected papers of Reinhard Selten). Norwell: Kluwer, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., & Fouraker, L. (1960). Bargaining and group decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, I. (1972). Bargaining theory. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics, Economic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E., Selten, R., & Winter, E. (1990). Alternating bid bargaining with a smallest money unit. Games and Economic Behavior, 2, 188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, D. (1989). Bargaining with common values. Journal of Economic Theory, 48, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, E. (1997). Negotiation in multi-issue committees. Journal of Public Economics, 65, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalyan Chatterjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chatterjee, K. (2014). Game Theory and the Practice of Bargaining. In: Chatterjee, K., Samuelson, W. (eds) Game Theory and Business Applications. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 194. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7095-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics