Skip to main content

Health Insurance in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Insurance

Abstract

Health insurance in the United States continues to be a complex mix of private and public programs. The advent of health-care reform legislation, the Patient Protection and Accountable Care Act (PPACA), portends significant new challenges and research opportunities. This chapter provides a historical overview of the US system and a summary of the key features of the PPACA that affect health insurance. Attention is then directed to the key issues in health insurance and an update on the research undertaken in the last decade. Key topics include adverse selection and moral hazard where the new research examines multidimensional selection, forward-looking behavior, prescription drug coverage, and utilization management as a mechanism to control moral hazard. Managed care continues to be the dominate form of private coverage and the research on its comparative advantage in selective contracting is reviewed along with the evidence on managed care backlash and the efforts at provider consolidation. New research is beginning to examine the market structure, conduct, and performance of the health insurance sector and this is reviewed. Much of the chapter is devoted to new research on important aspects of employer-sponsored health insurance. This includes premium sensitivity, compensating wage differentials, and the tax treatment of employer-sponsored coverage. Significant new research has also examined the role of the employer as agent for his/her workers. Individual, non-group markets have historically played a minor role in the USA. Knowledge of these markets is reviewed as is the immerging market in high-deductible health plans. Early research on state insurance regulation typically found only small effects. More recent research has tended to examine the effects of specific laws and to explore the effects among high- and low-risk individuals and firms. Finally, there has been substantial new research focusing in the Medicare program for older residents. This work examines the effects of risk adjustment in the Medicare Advantage program and the effects in the Medicare prescription drug program. Throughout the chapter attention is given to future avenues of research that are likely to emerge from the PPACA legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham JM, Karaca-Mandic P (2011) Regulating the medical loss ratio: implications for the individual market. Am J Manag Care 17(3):211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham JM, Royalty AB (2005) Does having two earners in the household matter for understanding how well employer-based health insurance works? Med Care Res Rev 62(2):167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achman L, Chollet D (2001) Insuring the uninsurable: an overview of state high-risk health insurance pools, publication 472. The Commonwealth Fund, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs G, Winterbottom C, Zedlewski S (1992) Employers’ payroll and insurances costs: implications for play or pay employer mandates. In: Health benefits and the workforce. U.S. Department of Labor, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Washington, DC, 195–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman D, Cutler D, Zeckhauser RJ (2003) Enrollee mix, treatment intensity, and cost in competing indemnity and HMO plans. J Health Econ 22(1):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron-Dine A, Einav L, Finkelstein A, Cullen MR (2012) Moral hazard in health insurance: how important is forward looking behavior? National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 17802

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiga S, O’Malley M (2005) Increasing premiums and cost sharing in medicaid and SCHIP: recent state experiences. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA. Medicaid and the Uninsured Issue Paper (May)

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherly AB, Dowd BE, Feldman R (2004) The effects of benefits, premiums, and health risk on health plan choice in the Medicare program. Health Serv Res 39(4, part 1):847–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker LC, Chan J (2007) Laws requiring health plans to provide direct access to obstetricians and gynecologists, and use of cancer screening by women. Health Serv Res 42(2, part 1):990–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Batata A (2004) The effects of HMOs on fee-for-service health care expenditures: evidence from Medicare revisited. J Health Econ 23:951–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya J, Bundorf MK (2009) The incidence of the healthcare costs of obesity. J Health Econ 28:649–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitler MP, Carpenter C (2009) Insurance mandates and mammography, Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California Irvine

    Google Scholar 

  • Blendon RJ, Brodie M, Altman DE (1998) Understanding the managed care backlash. Health Aff 17(1):80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg L, Nichols L, Banthin J (2001) Worker decisions to purchase health insurance. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 1(3/4):305–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borah BJ, Burns ME, Shah ND (2011) Assessing the impact of high deductible health plans on health-care utilization and cost: a changes-in-changes approach. Health Econ 20:1025–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie M, Brady LA, Altman DE (1998) Media coverage of managed care: is there a negative bias? Health Aff 17(1): 9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JR, Coe NB, Finkelstein A (2008) The interaction of public and private insurance: medicaid and the long term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev 98(3):1083–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Duggan M, Kuziemko I, Woolston W (2011) How does risk selection respond to risk adjustment? Evidence from the Medicare advantage program, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 16977

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmueller TC, DiNardo J (2002) Did community rating induce an adverse selection death spiral? Evidence from New York, Pennsylvania and Connecticut. Am Econ Rev 92(1):280–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmueller TC, Feldstein PJ (1996) Consumer’s sensitivity to health plan premiums: evidence from a natural experiment in California. Health Aff 15(1):143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmueller TC, Cooper P, Simon K, Vistnes J (2005) The effect of SCHIP expansion on health insurance decisions by employers. Inquiry 42:218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettgens M, Holahan J, Carroll C (2011) Health reform across the states: increased insurance coverage and federal spending on exchanges and medicaid. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce VC, Wieske JP (2010) Health insurance mandates in the States 2010. Council for Affordable Health Insurance, Alexandra. http://www.cahi.org/cahi_contents/resources/pdf/MandatesintheStates2010.pdf

  • Bundorf MK (2010) The effects of offering health plan choice within employment-based purchasing groups. J Risk Insur 77(1):105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundorf MK, Simon KI (2006) The effect of rate regulation on demand for supplemental health insurance. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 96(2):67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundorf MK, Herring B, Pauly MV (2010) Health risk, income, and employment-base health insurance. Forum Health Econ Pol 13(2):chapter 13

  • Cassidy A (2011) Health policy brief: putting limits on ‘Medigap’. Health Aff (September 13)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebul RD, Rebitzer JB, Taylor LJ, Votruba ME (2011) Unhealthy insurance markets: search frictions and the cost and quality of health insurance. Am Econ Rev 101(5):1842–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernew M, Frick K, McLaughlin CG (1997) The demand for health insurance coverage by low-income workers: can reduced premiums achieve full coverage? Health Serv Res 32(4):453–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Chollet D (2003) The Medigap market: product and pricing trends, 1999–2001. In: Monitoring Medicare + Choice operational insights. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chollet DJ, Kirk AM, Chow ME (2000) Mapping state health insurance markets: structure and change in the states’ group and individual insurance markets, 1995–1997. PPACAdemyHealth State Coverage Initiatives, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry NK, Rosenthal MB, Milstein A (2010) Assessing the evidence for value-based insurance design. Health Aff 29(11):1988–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton G, DiJulio B, Whitmore H, Pickreign JD, McHugh M, Osei-Anto A, Finder B (2010) Health benefits In 2010: premiums rise modestly, workers pay more toward coverage. Health Aff 29(10):1942–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane JH (1995) Time-consistent health insurance. J Polit Econ 103(3):445–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office (2004) An analysis of the literature on disease management programs. CBO, Washington, DC. www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/59xx/doc5909/10--13-DiseaseMngmnt.pdf

  • Congressional Budget Office (2006) Consumer-directed health plans: potential effects on health care spending and outcomes. CBO, Washington, DC http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/77xx/doc7700/12--21-HealthPlans.pdf

  • Congressional Budget Office (2010) Letter to speaker Nancy Pelosi, March 20, 2010, Table 4. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc11379/AmendReconProp.pdf

  • Cowan B, Schwab B (2012) The incidence of the healthcare costs of smoking. J Health Econ 30:1094–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham R, Cunningham RM Jr (1997) A history of the blue cross and blue shield system. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DM, Gruber J (1997) Medicaid and private insurance: evidence and implications. Health Aff 16(1):194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DM, Reber S (1996) Paying for health insurance: the tradeoff between competition and adverse selection. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5796

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DM, Zeckhauser RJ (2000) The anatomy of health insurance. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 563–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafny LS (2010) Are health insurance markets competitive? Am Econ Rev 100(4):1399–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafny LS, Duggan M, Ramanarayanan S (2012) Paying a premium on your premium? Consolidation in the U.S. health insurance industry. Am Econ Rev 102(2):1161–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff A, Blumberg L, Nichols L (2005) State health insurance market reforms and access to insurance for high risk employees. J Health Econ 24(4):725–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd B, Feldman R (1994/1995) Premium elasticities of health plan choice. Inquiry 31:438–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Dranove D, Lindrooth R, White WD, Zwanziger J (2008) Is the impact of managed care on hospital prices decreasing? J Health Econ 27(2):362–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan M, Hayford T (2011) Has the shift to managed care reduced medicaid expenditures? Evidence from state and local-level mandates. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 17236

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan M, Scott Morton FM (2006) The distortionary effects of government procurement: evidence from medicaid prescription drug purchasing. Q J Econ 71(1):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan M, Scott Morton FM (2010) The effect of Medicare part D on pharmaceutical prices and utilization. Am Econ Rev 100(1):590–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eibner C, Girosi F, Price CC, Cordova A, Hussey PS (2010) Establishing state health insurance exchanges: implications for health insurance enrollment, spending and small businesses. RAND Corp., Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang H, Keane MP, Silverman D (2008) Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the Medigap insurance market. J Polit Econ 116(2):303–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice (2004) Improving health care: a dose of competition. FTC/DOJ, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman R, Wholey D (2001) Do HMOs have Monopsony power? Int J Health Care Finance Econ 1(1):7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman R, Finch M, Dowd B, Cassou S (1989) The demand for employment-based health insurance plans. J Hum Resour 24(1):115–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman R, Dowd B, Leitz S, Blewett LA (1997) The effect of premiums on the small firm’s decision to offer health insurance. J Hum Resour 32(4):635–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein M, Feenberg D, MacGuinaes M (2011) Capping individual tax expenditure benefits. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 16921

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris TG, Chankg Y, Blumenthal D, Pearson SD (2001) Leaving gatekeeping behind – effects of opening access to specialists for adults in a health maintenance organization. New Engl J Med 345(18):1312–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A (2004) Minimum standards, insurance regulation, and adverse selection: evidence from the Medigap market. J Publ Econ 88(2):2515–2547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A (2007) The aggregate effects of health insurance: evidence from the introduction of Medicare. Q J Econ 72(1):1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2006) Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev 96(4):938–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishback PV, Kantor SE (2000) A prelude to the welfare state: the origins of workers’ compensation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frakt AB, Pizer SD, Wrobel MV (2004) High risk pools for uninsurable individuals: recent growth, future prospects. Health Care Financing Rev 26(2):73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronstin P (2005) Sources of health insurance and characteristics of the uninsured: analysis of the March 2005 current population survey. In: Employee benefits research institute issue brief, no. 287. EBRI, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronstin P (2010) Sources of health insurance and characteristics of the uninsured: analysis of the March 2010 current population survey. In: Employee benefits research institute issue brief, no. 347. EBRI,Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber AM, MaCurdy TE, McClellan MB (1999) Persistence of Medicare expenditures among elderly beneficiaries. Front Health Pol Res (2):153–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett B, Buettgens M (2011) Employer-sponsored insurance under health reform: reports of its demise are premature. Washington, DC: Urban Institute and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (January 15). http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/71749.pdf

  • Glied S (2000) Managed care. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, pp 707–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman DP, Joyce GF, Zheng Y (2007) Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health. J Am Med Assoc 298(1):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein GS, Pauly MV (1976) Group health insurance as a local public good. In: Rosett R (ed) The role of health insurance in the health services sector. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, pp 73–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (2005) Federal employees health benefits program: competition and other factors linked to wide variation in health care prices, Report GAO-05–856. GAO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber J (1994) The incidence of mandated maternity benefits. Am Econ Rev 84(3):622–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber J (2011) Massachusetts points the way to successful health care reform. J Pol Anal Manag 30(1):184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber J, Lettau M (2004) How elastic is the firm’s demand for health insurance? J Publ Econ 88:1273–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber J, McKnight R (2003) Why did employee premium contributions rise? J Health Econ 22:1082–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber J, Washington E (2005) Subsidies to employee health insurance premiums and the health insurance market. J Health Econ 24(1):253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley J, Reschovsky JD (2003) Small firms’ demand for health insurance: the decision to offer insurance. Inquiry 39:118–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA) (1990) Sourcebook of health insurance data, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim BT, Lurie IZ (2009) Do increased premium subsidies affect how much health insurance is purchased? Evidence from the self-employed. J Health Econ 28(6):1197–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring B, Lentz LK (2011) What can we expect from the ‘Cadillac Tax’ in 2018 and beyond? Inquiry 48(4):322–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring B, Pauly MV (2006) Incentive-compatible guaranteed renewable health insurance premiums. J Health Econ 25(3):395–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hing E, Jensen GA (1999) Health insurance portability and accountability Act of 1996: lessons from the states. Med Care 37:692–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holahan J, Zuckerman S, Evans A, Rangarajan S (1998) Medicaid managed care in thirteen states. Health Aff 17(3): 43–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D (2011) Does Massachusetts’ health care reform point to success with national reform? J Pol Anal Manag 30(1):177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen GA, Gabel J (1992) State mandated benefits and the small firm decision to offer insurance. J Regul Econ 4(4):379–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen GA, Morrisey MA (1999) Small group reform and insurance provision by small firms, 1989–1995. Inquiry 36:176–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen GA, Cotter KD, Morrisey MA (1995) State insurance regulation and an employer’s decision to self insure. J Risk Insur 62:185–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (2010a) Medicaid and managed care: key data, trends and issues. Menlo Park, CA. http://www.kff.org/medicaid/upload/8046--02.pdf

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (2010b) Medicare chartbook, 4th edn. Menlo Park, CA. http://facts.kff.org/chartbook.aspx?cb=58

  • Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust(HRET) (2010) Employer health benefits: 2009 annual survey, Table 10.2. Menlo Park, CA. http://ehbs.kff.org/pdf/2009/7936.pdf

  • Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET) (2011) Employer health benefits: 2011 annual survey, Exhibit 5.1. Menlo Park, CA. http://ehbs.kff.org/pdf/2011/8225.pdf

  • Kapur K, Gresenz CR, Studdert DM (2003) Managing care: utilization review in action at two capitated medical groups. Health Affairs Suppl Web Exclusive, W3–275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaca-Mandic P, Abraham JM, Phelps CE (2011) How do health insurance loading fees vary by group size? Implications for health reform. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 11(3):181–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney G, Marton J, McFeeters J, Costich J (2007) Assessing potential enrollment and budgetary effects of SCHIP premiums: findings from Arizona and Kentucky. Health Serv Res 42(6, part II):2354–2372

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel RA (1959) Price discrimination in medicine. J Law Econ 1:20–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandker RK, McCormick LA (1999) Medicare spending by beneficiaries with various types of supplemental insurance. Med Care Res Rev 56(2):137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klick J, Stratmann T (2007) Diabetes treatments and moral hazard. J Law Econ 50:519–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski A (2009) Censored quintile instrumental variable estimates of the price elasticity of expenditure on medical care. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 15085

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugesen MJ, Paul RR, Luft HS, Aubry W, Ganiats TG (2006) A comparative analysis of mandated benefits laws, 1949–2002. Health Serv Res 41(3, part 2):1081–1103

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz A, Buchanan JL, Mann J (1992) A randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a Medicaid HMO. J Health Econ 11(3):235–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessler DS, Wickizer TM (2000) The impact of utilization management on readmissions among patients with cardiovascular disease. Health Serv Res 34(6):1315–1359

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin PB, McKnight R, Heep S (2011) How effective are public polices to increase health insurance coverage among young adults? Am Econ J: Econ Pol 3(1):129–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy H, Weir D (2009) Take-up of Medicare part D: results from the health and retirement study. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 14692

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz A, Chernew M (1992) The firm’s demand for health insurance. In: Health benefits and the workforce. U.S. Department of Labor, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Washington, DC, pp 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Dow WH, Norton EC (2004) Effect of drive-through delivery laws on postpartum length of stay and hospital charges. J Health Econ 23(1):129–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoSasso AT, Buchmueller TC (2004) The effect of state children’s health insurance program on health insurance coverage. J Health Econ 23(6):1059–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoSasso AT, Lurie IZ (2009) Community rating and the market for private non-group health insurance. J Public Econ 93(1–2):264–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoSasso AT, Shah M, Frogner BK (2010) Health savings accounts and health care spending. Health Serv Res 45(4):1041–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynk WJ (2000) Some basics about most favored nation contracts in health care markets. Antitrust Bull 45(2):491–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciejewski ML, Dowd B, O’Connor H (2004) Multiple prior years of health expenditures and Medicare health plan choice. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 4:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis MS, Buntin MB (2006) How much risk pooling is there in the individual insurance market? Health Serv Res 41(5):1782–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis MS, Long SH (2001/2002) Effects of ‘Second Generation’ small group health insurance market reforms, 1993–1997. Inquiry 38:365–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis MS, Rogowski JA, Escarce JJ (2004/2005) The managed care backlash: did consumers vote with their feet? Inquiry 47:376–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton J, Ketsche PG, Zhou M (2009) SCHIP premiums, enrollment, and expenditures: a two state, competing risk analysis. Health Econ 19(7):772–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin CG, Chernew M, Taylor EF (2002) Medigap premiums and Medicare HMO enrollment. Health Serv Res 37(6):1445–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnick GA, Ketcham JD (2008) Have HMOs broadened their hospital networks? Changes in HMO hospital networks in California, 1999–2003. Med Care 46(3):339–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnick GA, Zwanziger J, Bamezai A, Pattison R (1992) The effects of market structure and bargaining position on hospital prices. J Health Econ 11:217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnick GA, Shen Y-C, Wu VY (2011) The increased concentration of health plan markets can benefit consumers through lower hospital prices. Health Aff 30(9):1728–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RD (2004) Estimating the compensating differential for employer-provided health insurance. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 4(1):27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RH, Luft HS (1994) Managed care plan performance since 1980. J Am Med Assoc 271(19):1512–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monheit AC (2003) Persistence in health expenditures in the short run: prevalence and consequences. Med Care 41(7 Supp):III-53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Monheit AC, Vistnes JP (1999) Health insurance availability at the workplace: how important are worker preferences? J Human Res 34(4):770–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran JR, Chernew ME, Hirth RA (2001) Preference diversity and the breath of employee health insurance options. Health Serv Res 36(5):911–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey MA (2001) Competition in hospital and health insurance markets: a review and research agenda. Health Serv Res 36(1, part 2):191–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey MA (2005) Price sensitivity in health care: implications for health policy, 2nd edn. National Federation of Independent Business Research Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey MA (2008) Health insurance. Health Administration Press,Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey MA, Kilgore ML, Becker DC, Smith W, Delzell E (2013) Favorable selection, risk adjustment and the Medicare advantage program. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lister Hill Center for Health Policy working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray JE (2007) Origins of American health insurance: a history of industrial sickness funds. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse JP (2010) Assessing health care reform’s impact on four key groups of Americans. Health Aff 29(9):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse JP, Insurance Experiment Group (1993) Free for all? lessons from the RAND health insurance experiment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse JP, Manning WG, Keeler EB, Sloss EM (1989) Adjusting capitation rates using objective health measures and prior utilization. Health Care Financing Rev 10(3):41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Numbers RL (1979) The third party: health insurance in America. In: Vogel HJ, Rosenberg CE (eds) The therapeutic revolution: essays in the history of medicine. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 177–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Okeke EN, Hirth RA, Grazier K (2010) Workers on the margin: who drops health coverage when prices rise? Inquiry 47(1):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne L (1996) How will medical savings accounts affect medical spending? Inquiry 33(3):225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly MV, Herring B (2001) Expanding coverage via tax credits: trade-offs and outcomes. Health Aff 20(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly MV, Herring B (2007) Risk pooling and regulation: policy and reality in today’s individual health insurance market. Health Aff 26(3):770–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly MV, Herring B, Song D (2002) Tax credits, the distribution of subsidized health insurance premiums, and the uninsured. Front Health Pol Res 5:103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R (2009) Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Med Assoc 301(6):603–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope GC, Kautter J, Ellis RP, Ashe AS, Avanian JZ, Iezzoni LI, Ingber MJ, Levy JM, Robst J (2004) Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model. Health Care Financing Rev 25(4):119–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettenmaier AJ, Wang Z (2006) Persistence in Medicare reimbursements and personal medical accounts. J Health Econ 25(1):39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JC, Luft HS (1987) Competition and the cost of hospital care, 1972 to 1982. J Am Med Assoc 257(23): 3241–3245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robst J (2006) Estimation of an hedonic pricing model for Medigap insurance. Health Serv Res 41(6): 2097–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royalty AB (2000) Tax preferences for fringe benefits and workers eligibility for employer health insurance. J Public Econ 75(2):209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royalty AB, Hagens J (2005) The effect of premiums on the decision to participate in health insurance and other fringe benefits offered by the employer: evidence from a real-world experiment. J Health Econ 24(1):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royalty AB, Solomon N (1999) Health plan choice: price elasticities in a managed competition setting. J Human Res 34(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon DP, Chernew M, Swaminathan S, Lee W (2006) Competition in health insurance markets: limitations of current measures for policy analysis. Med Care Res Rev 63(6 supp):37S–55S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldon TM, Gray BM (2006) Tax subsidies for employment-related health insurance. Health Aff 25(6):1568–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner L (1999) Health care costs, wages, and aging, working paper. Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon KI (2005) Adverse selection in health insurance markets? evidence from state small group health insurance reforms. J Public Econ 89(9–10):1865–1877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal S, Stueland J, Ungerman D (2011) How U.S. health care reform will affect employee benefits. McKinsey Q

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan FA, Shayne MW (1993) Long term care, Medicaid, and impoverishment of the elderly. Milbank Q 71(4):575–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan FA, Rattliff JR, Hall MA (2005) Impacts of managed care patient protection laws on health services utilization and patient satisfaction with care. Health Serv Res 40(3):647–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr P (1982) The social transformation of American medicine, Book II, Chapter 2. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strombom BA, Buchmueller TC, Feldstein PJ (2002) Switching costs, price sensitivity and health plan choice. J Health Econ 21:89–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson MA (2003) The importance of group health insurance: how tax policy shaped U.S. health insurance. Am Econ Rev 93(4):1373–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Town RJ, Wholey D, Feldman R, Burns LR (2007) Revisiting the relationship between managed care and hospital consolidation. Health Serv Res 42(1, Part 1):219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Vistnes JP, Morrisey MA, Jensen GA (2006) Employer choices of family premium sharing. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 6(1):25–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu VY (2009) Managed care’s price bargaining with hospitals. J Health Econ 28(2):350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin W, Basu A, Zhang JX, Rabbani A, Meltzer DO, Alexander GC (2008) The effect of the Medicare part D prescription benefit on drug utilization and expenditures. Ann Intern Med 148(3):169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziller EC, Coburn AF, McBride RTD, Andrews C (2002) Patterns of individual health insurance coverage, 1996–2000. Health Aff 23(6):210–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman S, Rajan S (1999) An alternative approach to measuring the effects of insurance market reforms. Inquiry 36:44–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Morrisey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science + Business media, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morrisey, M.A. (2013). Health Insurance in the United States. In: Dionne, G. (eds) Handbook of Insurance. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0155-1_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics