Skip to main content
Log in

Expression patterns of cp4-epsps gene in diverse transgenic Saccharum officinarum L. genotypes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glyphosate, a functional analogue of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), blocks the shikimate pathway by inhibiting the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS; EC 2.5.1.19) through interference with the conversion of (shikimate-3-phosphate) S3P and PEP to 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) and subsequently leads to plant death. This metabolic pathway possesses great potential to be used for development of herbicide resistant transgenic crops and here in this study, we wanted to check the expression potential of CP4-EPSPS gene in various sugarcane genotypes. A synthetic version of CP4-EPSPS gene synthesized commercially, cloned in pGreen0029 vector, was transformed into regenerable embryogenic calli of three different sugarcane cultivars HSF-240, S2003US-778 and S2003US-114 using biolistic gene transfer approach for comparative transcriptional studies. Transgenic lines screened by PCR analysis were subjected to Southern hybridization for checking transgene integration patterns. All the tested lines were found to contain multiple (3–6) insert copies. Putative transgenic plants produced the CP4-EPSPS protein which was detected using immunoblot analysis. The CP4-EPSPS transcript expression detected by qRT-PCR was found to vary from genotype to genotype and is being reported first time. In vitro glyphosate assay showed that transformed plants were conferring herbicide tolerance. It is concluded that different cultivars of sugarcane give variable expression of the same transgene and reasons for this phenomenon needs to be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamczyk J Jr, Meredith W Jr (2004) 1260501. Genetic basis for variability of Cry1Ac expression among commercial transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton cultivars in the United States. J Cotton Sci 8:433–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamczyk JJ, Sumerford DV (2001) Potential factors impacting season-long expression of Cry1Ac in 13 commercial varieties of Bollgard® cotton. J Insect Sci 1(13):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altpeter F, Baisakh N, Beachy R, Bock R, Capell T, Christou P, Daniell H, Datta K, Datta S, Dix PJ (2005) Particle bombardment and the genetic enhancement of crops: myths and realities. Mol Breeding 15:305–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower R, Elliott AR, Potier BA, Birch RG (1996) High-efficiency, microprojectile-mediated cotransformation of sugarcane, using visible or selectable markers. Mol Breeding 2:239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield M, D’hont A, Berding N (2001) The sugarcane genome: a synthesis of current understanding, and lessons for breeding and biotechnology. In: Proc S Afr Sug Technol Ass. Citeseer, pp 1–5

  • Cao G, Liu Y, Zhang S, Yang X, Chen R, Zhang Y, Lu W, Liu Y, Wang J, Lin M (2012) A novel 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase shows high glyphosate tolerance in Escherichia coli and tobacco plants. PLoS ONE 7:e38718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chou T-C, Moyle RL (2014) Synthetic versions of firefly luciferase and Renilla luciferase reporter genes that resist transgene silencing in sugarcane. BMC Plant Biol 14:92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dill GM (2005) Glyphosate-resistant crops: history, status and future. Pest Manag Sci 61:219–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dong H, Li W (2007) Variability of endotoxin expression in Bt transgenic cotton. J Agron Crop Sci 193:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finn TE, Wang L, Smolilo D, Smith NA, White R, Chaudhury A (2011) Transgene expression and transgene-induced silencing in diploid and autotetraploid Arabidopsis. Genetics 187:409–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan E, Llewellyn D, Fitt G (1998) What’s happening to the expression of the insect protection in field-grown Ingard® cotton. In: The ninth Australian cotton conference proceedings, pp 291–297

  • Fu H, Dooner HK (2002) Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9573–9578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S, Minshull J (2004) Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol 22:346–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MA, Anderson DJ, Birch RG (2013) Comparison of Agrobacterium and particle bombardment using whole plasmid or minimal cassette for production of high-expressing, low-copy transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 22:143–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang N, Bao Z, Zhang X, Eddy SR, Wessler SR (2004) Pack-MULE transposable elements mediate gene evolution in plants. Nature 431:569–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinkema M, Geijskes J, Palupe A, Shand K, Coleman HD, Brinin A, Williams B, Sainz M, Dale JL (2014) Improved molecular tools for sugar cane biotechnology. Plant Mol Biol 84:497–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lai J, Ma J, Swigoňová Z, Ramakrishna W, Linton E, Llaca V, Tanyolac B, Park Y-J, Jeong O-Y, Bennetzen JL (2004) Gene loss and movement in the maize genome. Genome Res 14:1924–1931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera A, Enrique R, Perera MF, Ostengo S, Racedo J, Costilla D, Zossi S, Cuenya MI, Filippone MP, Welin B (2015) Genetic characterization and field evaluation to recover parental phenotype in transgenic sugarcane: a step toward commercial release. Mol Breeding 35:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew W, Adamczyk J (2006) Nitrogen fertility and planting date effects on lint yield and Cry1Ac (Bt) endotoxin production. Agron J 98:691–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollegioni L, Schonbrunn E, Siehl D (2011) Molecular basis of glyphosate resistance: different approaches through protein engineering. FEBS J 278:2753–2766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs E, Benedict J, Stelly D, Taylor J, Altman D, Berberich S (1998) Expression and segregation of genes encoding CryIA insecticidal proteins in cotton. Crop Sci 38:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tzin V, Galili G (2010) The biosynthetic pathways for shikimate and aromatic amino acids in Arabidopsis thaliana. Arabidopsis Book 8:e0132

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers J, Grof C, Bonnett G, Jackson P, Morgan T (2005) Effects of tissue culture, biolistic transformation, and introduction of PPO and SPS gene constructs on performance of sugarcane clones in the field. Crop Pasture Sci 56:57–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welch M, Villalobos A, Gustafsson C, Minshull J (2011) 3 Designing genes for successful protein expression. Method Enzymol 498:43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wessler SR (2001) Plant transposable elements. A hard act to follow. Plant Physiol 125:149–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahid Mukhtar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imran, M., Barboza, A.L., Asad, S. et al. Expression patterns of cp4-epsps gene in diverse transgenic Saccharum officinarum L. genotypes. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 25, 779–786 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-019-00650-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-019-00650-y

Keywords

Navigation