Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative Left Portal Vein Embolization for Left Liver Resection in High-Risk Hepatobiliary Malignancy Patients

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed for right liver (RL) and sometimes left liver (LL) resection to prevent postoperative surgical complications.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 10 patients who underwent preoperative left PVE before LL resection for hepatobiliary malignancies along with 3 propensity score-matched control groups (n = 40 each).

Results

Mean patient age was 68.6 ± 6.9 years. Diagnoses included intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 4), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3), neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 1), recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), and inflammatory liver mass (n = 1). The reason for left PVE was a large LL >40 % of the total liver volume (TLV) with a major comorbidity or age > 70 years with a poor overall condition. All patients underwent preplanned operations, including LL resection at 1–3 weeks post PVE. The LL volume proportion of the TLV was 44.9 ± 1.7 and 40.7 ± 2.3 % before and after PVE; thus, 1–2 weeks post PVE, the kinetic shrinkage rate of the LL was 9.4 ± 3.3 %, and the kinetic growth rate of the RL was 7.6 ± 2.7 %. The overall surgical complication rates were 40, 50, and 39.2 % in the left PVE, large LL control, and all three control groups, respectively (p ≥ 0.727). In contrast, the adjusted rates of major complications were 0 % in the left PVE group versus 36.8 % (p = 0.040), 25.6 % (p = 0.123), and 15.8 % (p = 0.295) in the large-, medium-, and small-sized LL control groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Our experience indicates that left PVE is safe and induces atrophy of the LL effectively. We suggest that it can be a useful option to reduce the risk of postoperative complications in elderly high-risk patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yokoyama Y, Nagino M, Nimura Y (2007) Mechanisms of hepatic regeneration following portal vein embolization and partial hepatectomy: a review. World J Surg 31:367–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shindoh J, Truty MJ, Aloia TA et al (2013) Kinetic growth rate after portal vein embolization predicts posthepatectomy outcomes: toward zero liver-related mortality in patients with colorectal liver metastases and small future liver remnant. J Am Coll Surg 216:201–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee SG, Hwang S (2005) How I do it: assessment of hepatic functional reserve for indication of hepatic resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang S, Ha TY, Song GW et al (2015) Quantified risk assessment for major hepatectomy via the indocyanine green clearance rate and liver volumetry combined with standard liver volume. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1305–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang S, Ha TY, Ko GY et al (2015) Preoperative sequential portal and hepatic vein embolization in patients with hepatobiliary malignancy. World J Surg 39:2990–2998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harimoto N, Yoshizumi T, Shimokawa M et al (2016) Sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor following hepatic resection in patients 70 years of age and older with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res (in press)

  7. Sulpice L, Rayar M, Campillo B et al (2014) Advanced age remains an Achilles heel for liver resections. World J Surg 38:918–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiergens TS, Lindenthaler A, Thomas MN et al (2016) Time-dependent impact of age and co-morbidities on long-term overall survival after liver resection. Liver Int (in press)

  9. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF, Spitznagel EL Jr et al (2012) Comparison of scoring methods for ACE-27: simpler is better. J Geriatr Oncol 3:238–245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ko GY, Sung KB, Yoon HK et al (2003) Preoperative portal vein embolization with a new liquid embolic agent. Radiology 227:407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoo H, Ko GY, Gwon DI et al (2009) Preoperative portal vein embolization using an amplatzer vascular plug. Eur Radiol 19:1054–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon YI, Hwang S, Ko GY et al (2015) Balloon dilation of jejunal afferent loop functional stenosis following left hepatectomy and hepaticojejunostomy long time after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case report. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 19:66–70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Komori K, Nagino M, Nimura Y (2006) Hepatocyte morphology and kinetics after portal vein embolization. Br J Surg 93:745–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S et al (2010) Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:476–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hwang S, Lee SG, Ko GY et al (2009) Sequential preoperative ipsilateral hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization to induce further liver regeneration in patients with hepatobiliary malignancy. Ann Surg 249:608–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H et al (2006) Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term followup. Ann Surg 243:364–372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayashi S, Baba Y, Ueno K et al (2007) Acceleration of primary liver tumor growth rate in embolized hepatic lobe after portal vein embolization. Acta Radiol 48:721–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoo H, Kim JH, Ko GY et al (2011) Sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization versus portal vein embolization only before major hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1251–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, S., Ko, GY., Kim, MH. et al. Preoperative Left Portal Vein Embolization for Left Liver Resection in High-Risk Hepatobiliary Malignancy Patients. World J Surg 40, 2758–2765 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3618-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3618-7

Keywords

Navigation