Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience

  • Topics
  • A new era of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of leading Eastern and Western centers
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background/purpose

Both curative resection and minimized in-hospital mortality offer the only chance of long-term survival in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The reported resectability rates for hilar cholangiocarcinoma have increased by virtue of combined major hepatectomy, but this procedure is technically demanding and still associated with a significant morbidity and mortality that must be carefully balanced against the chances of long-term survival.

Methods

Between January 2001 and December 2008, 350 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent exploration for the purpose of potentially curative resection, of whom 302 (86.3%) were resected in the Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine. Combined hepatectomy was carried out in 268 (88.7%) of 302 resected patients. Major hemihepatectomy and parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy were performed in 257 and 11 patients, respectively. Portal vein resection was associated in 40 (14.9%) of 268 hepatectomized patients. To control preoperative cholangitis and reduce risk of postoperative hepatic failure, biliary decompression through endoscopic and/or percutaneous transhepatic drainage and portal vein embolization were preoperatively applied in 329 (94.0%) of 350 explored patients and in 91 (54.2%) of 168 extended hepatectomized patients (154 right hemihepatectomy, 9 right trisectionectomy, 5 left trisectionectomy), respectively. Liver transplantation was not performed as primary treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Results

There were 5 cases (1.7%) of in-hospital death after resection and 1 postoperative liver failure that was successfully treated with liver transplantation. Major complications were encountered in 23 patients (7.0%), and the overall morbidity rate was 43%. In 302 resections, 214 (70.9%) were curative resections (R0) and 88 (29.1%) were palliative resections (R1). The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates after resection, including in-hospital deaths, were 84.6, 50.7 and 47.3% in the R0 group and 69.9, 33.3 and 7.5% in the R1 group, respectively. The 5-year survival rate of extended hemihepatectomy of 36.4% was better than that of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy at 10.5%. Two significant predictive factors adversely affecting survival after resection were lymph node metastasis and incurability of surgery (P < 0.001). Two patients with vascular involvement who underwent concomitant hepatic artery and portal vein reconstruction are alive after more than 3 years.

Conclusion

Preoperative biliary decompression and portal vein embolization enabled us to reduce in-hospital deaths associated with extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Major hemihepatectomy offers an increased survival because of the higher possibility of curative resection than bile duct resection alone and parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy, but it still carries a certain mortality. Less extensive procedures can be conducted safely and are beneficial for aged patients in poor condition with a less advanced tumor stage if tumor-free resectional margins are obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kawasaki S, Imamura H, Kobayashi A, Noike T, Miwa S, Miyagawa S. Results of surgical resection for patients with hilar bile duct cancer: application of extended hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U, Thelen A, Benckert C, Lopez-Hänninen E, et al. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;388:194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T. One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg. 2006;244:240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, Werner M, Weimann A, Pichlmayr R. What constitutes long-term survival after surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma? Cancer. 1997;79:26–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H, Ebata T, Arai T, Nimura Y. Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg. 2006;243:364–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimada H, Endo I, Sugita M, Masunari H, Fujii Y, T anaka K, et al. Hepatic resection combined with portal vein or hepatic artery reconstruction for advanced carcinoma of the hilar bile duct and gallbladder. World J Surg. 2003;27(10):1137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SG, Lee YJ, Park KM, Hwang S, Min PC. One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7:135–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebata T, Kamiya J, Nishio H, Nagasaka T, Nimura Y, Nagino M. The concept of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is valid. Br J Surg. 2009;96:926–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang S, Lee SG, Ko GY, Kim BS, Sung KB, Kim MH, et al. Sequential preoperative ipsilateral hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization to induce further liver regeneration in patients with hepatobiliary malignancy. Ann Surg. 2009;249:608–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hemming AW, Reed AI, Fujita S, Foley DP, Howard RJ. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;241:693–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyazaki M, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Otsuka M, Kato A, et al. Extensive hilar bile duct resection using a transhepatic approach for patients with hepatic hilar bile duct diseases. Am J Surg. 2008;196:125–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimada H, Endo I, Sugita M, Masunari H, Fujii Y, Tanaka K, et al. Is parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy a noble option in the surgical treatment for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;388:33–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagino M, Kanai M, Morioka A, Yamamoto H, Kawabata Y, Hayakawa N, et al. Portal and arterial embolization before extensive liver resection in patients with markedly poor functional reserve. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1063–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, Nishio H, Ebata T, Nimura Y. “Anatomic” right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006;243:28–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikeyama T, Nagino M, Oda K, Ebata T, Nishio H, Nimura Y. Surgical approach to Bismuth type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinomas—audit of 54 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Nagasaka T, Nimura Y. Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2003;238:720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kondo S, Katoh H, Hirano S, Ambo Y, Tanaka E, Okushiba S. Portal vein resection and reconstruction prior to hepatic dissection during right hepatectomy and caudate lobectomy for hepatobiliary cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:694–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hwang S, Ha TY, Jung DH, Park JI, Lee SG. Portal vein interposition using homologous iliac vein graft during extensive resection for hilar bile duct cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:888–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Song GW, Lee SG, Hwang S, Kim KH, Cho YP, Ahn CS, et al. Does Portal vein resection with hepatectomy improve survival in locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma? Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;93:935–42.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T, Tsuchikawa T, Kato K. No-touch resection of hilar malignancies with right hepatectomy and routine portal reconstruction. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:502–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M, et al. Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not? Surgery. 2007;141:581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robles R, Figueras J, Turrión VS, Margarit C, Moya A, Varo E, et al. Spanish experience in liver transplantation for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;239:265–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rea DJ, Heimbach JK, Rosen CB, Haddock MG, Alberts S, Kremers WK, et al. Liver transplantation with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is more effective than resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242:451–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitagawa Y, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, et al. Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection. Ann Surg. 2001;233:385–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maeba T, Maeta H, Wakabayashi H, Okada S, Mori S, Karasawa Y. Modified hepatoduodenal ligamentectomy for advanced carcinoma of the biliary tract: the importance of preservation of the replaced left hepatic artery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5(3):297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnab2-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea

    Sung Gyu Lee, Gi Won Song, Shin Hwang, Tae Yong Ha, Deok Bog Moon, Dong Hwan Jung, Ki Hun Kim & Chul Soo Ahn

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Myung Hwan Kim & Sung Koo Lee

  3. Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Kyu Bo Sung & Gi Young Ko

Authors
  1. Sung Gyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gi Won Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shin Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tae Yong Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Deok Bog Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dong Hwan Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ki Hun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chul Soo Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Myung Hwan Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sung Koo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kyu Bo Sung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Gi Young Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Gyu Lee.

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.G., Song, G.W., Hwang, S. et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17, 476–489 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0204-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0204-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation