Abstract
In 2006, over 700,000 Chilean secondary students took to the streets in demand of educational equity. This revolución pingüina was quieted by promises of solutions coming from a multidisciplinary group of specialists summoned to tackle the crisis. In 2011, university students organized massive demonstrations to call for the end of a neoliberal economic model that had shattered public education and fostered inequality. In these movements, the emergence of digital social media, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and blogging, becomes an effective catalyst for raising social awareness over social, political, historical, and economic factors that perpetuate inequality in the Global South. The aim of our study is to describe the construal of the discursive representation of the student mobilization in a corpus of 349 blog comments to editorials and opinion columns of online Chilean newspapers. Our research adopts the theoretical-methodological framework of two paradigms, namely, the tenets of the critical discourse analysis and the principles of the systemic functional linguistics. Both paradigms throw light on the meaning that ideational resources – expressed by the presence of taxonomic relations (repetitions, antonyms, synonyms, etc.) and nuclear relations (participants connected to a series of activities) – have in the construction of portraits of reality in discourse. The results of our exploration into construction of the representation of social actors in the comments posted by e-citizens showed that the Chilean student movement is construed as an instance of restitution of the citizens’ rights and the restoration of honesty and dependability in the political sphere. This study is part of a research funded by the FONDECYT Project 1120784.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alvarez, S. E., de Lima Costa, C., Feliu, V., Hester, R., Klahn, N., & Thayer, M. (2014). Translocalities/translocalidades: Feminist politics of translation in the Latin/a Américas. Durham: Duke University Press.
Carpentier, N., & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, democracy, agonism and journalism. An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964–975.
Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S. A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 9–42.
Corrado, A., & Firestone, C. M. (Eds.). (1996). Elections in cyberspace: Towards a new era in American politics. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow: Pearson.
Figueroa, F. (2013). Llegamos para quedarnos: Crónicas de la revuelta estudiantil. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.
Flores Leiva, M., & Quezada Yáñez, L. (2013). La dimensión artística de la manifestación: Marchando desde la Facultad de Artes de la Universidad de Chile. In C. Illanes (Ed.), En marcha: Ensayos sobre arte, violencia y cuerpo en la manifestación social (pp. 35–48). Santiago: Adrede Editora.
Gaventa, J., & Tandom, R. (2010). Globalizing citizens: New dynamics of inclusion and exclusion. London: Zed Books.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, UK: Polity. (Original work published 1962).
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. doi:10.1111/ j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Hayes, E. R., & Gee, J. P. (2010). Public pedagogy through video games: Design, resources and affinity spaces. In J. A. Sandlin, B. D. Schultz, & J. Burdick (Eds.), Handbook of public pedagogy: Education and learning beyond schooling (pp. 185–193). New York: Routledge.
Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Hill, S., & Rothschild, D. (1992). The impact of regime on the diffusion of political conflict. In M. Midlasrsky (Ed.), The internationalization of communal strife (pp. 189–206). London: Routledge.
Keren, M. (2010). Blogging and mass politics. Biography, 31(1), 110–126.
Loveman, B., & Lira, E. (2000). Las suaves cenizas del olvido: Vía chilena de reconciliación política 1814–1932. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.
Macnamara, J. (2012). Democracy 2.0: Can social media engage youth and disengaged citizens in the public sphere? Australian Journal of Communication, 39(3), 65–86.
Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. London: Sage.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Mayol, A. (2012). El derrumbe del modelo. Santiago: LOM.
Meyer, D. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145.
Montecino, L. (2011). Por qué marchan los estudiantes en Chile?: Discurso electrónico y poder en un ciberperiódico chileno. Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade, 12(2), 179–209.
Montecino, L., & Arancibia, M. C. (2013). Representaciones discursivas en comentarios de blogs de ciberperíodicos chilenos. Cadernos de linguagem e sociedade, número especial, 14, 278–304.
O’Malley, M. P., & Nelson, S. (2013). The public pedagogy of student activists in Chile: What have we learned from the penguins’ revolution? Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(2), 41–56.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Revolution, normalization and new agenda for online deliberation. New Media Society, 14(2), 244–261.
Salazar, G. (2013). Movimientos sociales en Chile: Trayectoria histórica y proyección política. Santiago: Uqbar.
Scott, J. C. (2012). Two cheers for anarchism: Six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Somma, N. (2012). The Chilean student movement of 2011–2012: Challenging the marketization of education. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements Event Analysis, 4(2), 296–309.
Tarrow, S. (1997). El poder del movimiento: Los movimientos sociales, la acción colectiva y la política. Madrid: Alianza.
Trifonas, P. P. (2010). Digital literacy and public pedagogy: The digital game as a form of learning. In J. A. Sandlin, B. D. Schultz, & J. Burdick (Eds.), Handbook of public pedagogy: Education and learning beyond schooling (pp. 179–184). New York: Routledge.
Vallejo, C. (2012). Podemos cambiar el mundo. Santiago: La Vida es hoy/Ocean Sur.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: OUP.
Wolfsfeld, G. (2011). Making sense of media and politics: Five principles in political communication. New York: Routledge.
Woodly, D. (2008). New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choices, 134(1&2), 109–123.
Wright, S. (2012). Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media and Society, 14(2), 244–261.
Yus, F. (2010). Ciberpragmática 2.0: Nuevos usos del lenguaje en internet. Barcelona: Ariel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Arancibia, C., Sadlier, S.T., Montecino, L. (2015). Impact of Social Media on Chilean Student Movement. In: Kallio, K., Mills, S., Skelton, T. (eds) Politics, Citizenship and Rights. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 7. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-94-1_10-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-94-1_10-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-94-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences