Definitions
Interdisciplinary gerontological perspectives that attempt to explain why some individuals are better able to adapt to the challenges of aging than others.
Activity and disengagement theories of aging were the first to use social science data to explain why some individuals, or groups, are more adaptive or “successful” in meeting the multiple and inevitable challenges of aging than other persons. These theories for the first time focused on social, psychological, and interpersonal factors in addition to more observable physiological and medical conditions of aging. They also called attention to the positive and healthy aspects of aging rather than frailty, decline, and decrement – which was the focus at the time, not only of the medical establishment in geriatrics but also within social services and public policy for the aged. The debates following activity and disengagement theories changed...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Achenbaum, W. A., & Bengtson, V. L. (1994). Re-engaging the disengagement theory of aging: On the history and assessment of theory development in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 34(6), 756–763.
Bengtson, V. L. (1969). Cultural and occupational differences in level of present role activity in retirement. In R. J. Havighurst, J. M. A. Munnichs, B. L. Neugarten, & H. Thomae (Eds.), Adjustment to retirement: A cross-national study (pp. 35–53). Assen: Van Gorkum.
Bengtson, V. L., & Kuypers, J. A. (1971). Generational difference and the developmental stake. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 2(4), 249–260.
Carstensen, L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151–156.
Cumming, E. (1963). Further thoughts on the theory of disengagement. International Social Science Journal, 15(3), 377–393.
Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.
Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1(1), 8–13.
Havighurst, R. J., & Albrecht, R. E. (1953). Older people. New York: Longmans, Green.
Hochschild, A. R. (1975). Disengagement theory: A critique and proposal. American Sociological Review, 40(5), 553–569.
Knapp, R. J. (1977). The activity theory of aging: An examination in the English context. The Gerontologist, 17(6), 553–559.
Lemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L., & Peterson, J. A. (1972). An exploration of the activity theory of aging: Activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of Gerontology, 27(4), 511–523.
Longino, C. F., & Kart, C. S. (1982). Explicating activity theory: A formal replication. Journal of Gerontology, 37(6), 713–722.
Maddox, G. L., Jr. (1964). Disengagement theory: A critical evaluation. The Gerontologist, 4, 80–82.
Neugarten, B. L. (1969). Continuities and discontinuities of psychological issues into adult life. Human Development, 12, 121–130.
Reitzes, D. C., Mutran, E. J., & Verrill, L. A. (1995). Activities and self-esteem continuing the development of activity theory. Research on Aging, 17(3), 260–277.
Rose, A. (1964). A current theoretical issue in social gerontology. The Gerontologist, 4, 456–460.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful. Science, New Series, 237(4811), 143–149.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books.
Zaranek, R. R., & Chapleski, E. E. (2005). Casino gambling among urban elders: Just another social activity? Journal of Gerontology Social Science, 60B, S74–S81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
DeLiema, M., Bengtson, V.L. (2015). Activity Theory, Disengagement Theory, and Successful Aging. In: Pachana, N. (eds) Encyclopedia of Geropsychology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_102-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_102-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-080-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences