Skip to main content

Posthumanist Approaches to Theorizing Children’s Human-Nature Relations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Space, Place, and Environment

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 3))

Abstract

By exploring and reconsidering the view of children’s encounters with nature from a posthumanist perspective, this chapter seeks to dismantle rather than support constructions of a nature-culture binary. A posthumanist approach adopts the tools of new materialism by allowing for the rereading of research data by decentering the human and attending to the complexity of child-nature relations. This work is done in order to unpack the means through which romanticized notions of children’s “nature” experiences can be embedded in Western-centric literature in the child-nature movement, a movement that is having significant currency in environmental and sustainability education literature as well. To illustrate the importance of including a diversity of stories of children-nature relations, and to explore the challenges in rereading research through these theoretical lenses, two contrasting cases are explored. One of the cases emerges from research conducted in Semey, a city on the northeast border of Kazakhstan where issues of nuclear radiation are a historical concern and the second draws on children’s encounters of “grubs” and “worms” in an early childhood center in Melbourne, Australia. I have deliberately set out in this chapter to reveal the messiness of documenting and theorizing children’s encounters with the environment in order to open up new imaginings of childhood, nature, and education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barad, K. (1997). Meeting the universe halfway: realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In L. H. Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp. 161–194). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., & Mcphie, J. (2014). Becoming animate in education: Immanent materiality and outdoor learning for sustainability. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(3), 198–216. doi:10.1080/14729679.2014.919866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, E. (2013). The misdiagnosis: Rethinking “nature-deficit disorder”. Environmental Communication, 7(3), 315–414. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.802704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., Gernot, B., Aliya, H., Rachel, S., Kimberly, W., & Shapiro, E. (2007a). Young children’s environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., Juen, B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Corraliza, J. A., & Kaiser, F. G. (2007b). Children’s cross-cultural environmental attitudes and self-reported behaviors. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 128–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2014). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and research assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (2007). No Fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165. Retrieved from http://environmentalhumanities.org

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, C. (2005). Playing and affective time-spaces. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P., & Kellert, S. (Eds.). (2002). Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraftl, P. (2014). Geographies of alternative education: Diverse learning spaces for children and young people. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2013). Childhood and biopolitics: Climate change, life processes and human futures. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, J. (2012). Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2011). The nature principle. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2004). “Holding environments”: Creating spaces to support children’s environmental learning in the 21st century. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 20, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2007). The Bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Researcher, 13(4), 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2015). Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates. Children’s Geographies. doi:10.1080/14733285.2015.1077369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phenice, L. A., & Griffore, R. J. (2003). Young children and the natural environment. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(2), 167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P. (2013a). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P. (2013b). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a Finnish study of child-matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474. doi:10.1177/0907568213496653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotas, N. (2015). Ecologies of Praxis: Teaching and leaning against the obvious. In N. Snaza & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (1995). Two lessons from Burroughs. In J. Halberstam & I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2013). Ecological community, the sense of the world, and senseless extinction. Environmental Humanities, 2, 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: Reclaiming the heart in nature education. Great Barrington: The Orion Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2011). Reconceptualising the nature of childhood. Childhood, 18(4), 420–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. Oxon/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25, 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., Blaise, M., & Guigni, M. (2013). Haraway’s ‘bag lady story-telling’: Relocating childhood and learning within a ‘post-human landscape’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, B. (2011). A dog who I know quite well’ everyday relationships between children and animals. Children’s Geographies, 9(2), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. (1994a). Pollution stinks. De Lier: Academic Book Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. (1994b). Nobody planted it, it just grew! young adolescents’ perceptions and the experience of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children’s Environments, 11(3), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1994). Preschool children’s perspectives on the environment. Paper presented at the North American Association for Environmental Education, Cancun.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Malone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia, as represented by University of Western Sydney

About this entry

Cite this entry

Malone, K. (2016). Posthumanist Approaches to Theorizing Children’s Human-Nature Relations. In: Nairn, K., Kraftl, P. (eds) Space, Place, and Environment. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-044-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics