Skip to main content

The Social Contract of Science

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions

Synonyms

State/society and scientific system relationship

Definition

The “social contract of science” is a metaphor used to characterize the relationship between the state/society and the scientific system. When changes in this relationship are discussed, a distinction is often made between an “old” or “traditional” social contract on the one side and an “emerging,” “new,” or “revised” social contract on the other (e.g., Gibbons 1999; Guston and Keniston 1994a; Guston 2000; Martin and Etzkowitz 2001; Nowotny et al. 2001; Van der Meulen 1998). This entry will outline the main characteristics of both the “traditional” and the “emerging” social contract and briefly discuss some limitations of this framework.

The Traditional Social Contract of Science

The traditional social contract has been described in the following terms: “Government promises to fund the basic science that peer reviewers find most worthy of support, and scientists promise that the research will be performed well and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bush, Vannevar. (1945) 1990. Science: The endless frontier. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M., Richard R. Nelson, and John P. Walsh. 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. 1998. The endless transition: A “Triple Helix” of University-industry-government relations. Minerva 36: 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael. 1999. Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402: C81–C84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotony, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbrandsen, Magnus, and Jens-Kristian Smeby. 2005. Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy 34: 932–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David H. 2000. Between politics and science: Assuring the productivity and integrity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David H., and Kenneth Keniston. 1994a. The fragile contract. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David H., and Kenneth Keniston. 1994b. Introduction: The social contract for science. In The fragile contract, ed. David H. Guston and Kenneth Keniston, 1–41. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Stephen J., and Nathan Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, ed. Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg, 275–305. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Ben R. 2003. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In Science and innovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance, ed. Aldo Geuna, Ammon J. Salter, and W. Edward Steinmueller, 7–39. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Ben R., and Henry Etzkowitz. 2001. The origin and evolution of the university species. Journal for Science and Technology Studies 13: 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. (1942) 1973. The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. Robert K. Merton, 267–280. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga, Peter B. Scott, and Michael T. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1: 54–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, Nico. 1994. Knowledge societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Meulen, Barend. 1998. Science policies as principal-agent games: Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science. Research Policy 27: 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Schomberg, Rene. 2011. Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, ed. Marc Dusseldorp and Richard Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Mejlgaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mejlgaard, N., Aagaard, K. (2017). The Social Contract of Science. In: Shin, J., Teixeira, P. (eds) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_428-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_428-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics