Abstract
This chapter discusses different philosophical theories regarding the goals of medicine and places this debate within the context of the moral limits of the proper use of medical means. Two approaches are distinguished: first, a teleological approach, which sees medicine as a practice with an inherent telos and second, a consensual approach, which aims at assembling a list of goals of medicine that are identified in a deliberative process. This chapter also discusses the concept of medicine and scrutinizes whether it has any bearing on the debate regarding the goals of medicine. It is argued that the goals of medicine are still contested and will probably remain so. They cannot be used in a direct way to solve normative questions regarding the proper use of medicine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Arras JD (2001) A method in search of a purpose: the internal morality of medicine. J Med Philos 26(6):643–662
Boorse C (2016) Goals of medicine. In: Giroux E (ed) Naturalism in the philosophy of health: issues and implications. Springer, Cham, pp 145–177
Brülde B (2001) The goals of medicine. Towards a unified theory. Health Care Anal 9:1–13
Cassell EJ (1991) The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hastings Center (1996) Special supplement: the goals of medicine: setting new priorities. Hastings Cent Rep 26(6):S1–S27
Kaldjian LC (2014) Practicing medicine and ethics: integrating wisdom, conscience, and goals of care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kass LR (1985) Toward a more natural science: biology and human affairs. The Free Press, New York
Marcum JA (2008) Humanizing modern medicine. An introductory philosophy of medicine. Springer, Heidelberg
Miller FG, Brody H (1998) The internal morality of medicine: explication and application to managed care. J Med Philos 23:384–410
Nordenfelt L (1998) On medicine and health enhancement – towards a conceptual framework. Med Health Care Philos 1:5–12
Nordin I (1999) The limits of medical practice. Theor Med Bioeth 20:105–123
Pellegrino E (1999) The goals and ends of medicine: how are they to be defined? In: Hanson MJ, Callahan D (eds) The goals of medicine: the forgotten issue in health care reform. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 55–68
Pellegrino E (2001) The internal morality of clinical medicine: a paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions. J Med Philos 26(6):559–579
Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC (1981) A philosophical basis of medical practice: toward a philosophy and ethic of the healing professions. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford
Temkin O (1966) The meaning of medicine in historical perspective. Reprinted in Temkin O. The double face of Janus and other essay in the history of medicine. Johns Hopkins University Press 1977, Baltimore, pp 41–49
Veatch RM (2001) The impossibility of a morality internal to medicine. J Med Philos 26(6):621–642
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schramme, T. (2017). Goals of Medicine. In: Schramme, T., Edwards, S. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8687-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8688-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities