The Actional Turn in the Sciences of Culture
We argue that an actional turn is currently taking place across all the social and human sciences – the “sciences of culture.” By “actional turn,” we mean the fact that each studied phenomenon is seen through practice, as a practice. For example, Science is studied “in action” (Latour 1987), in a research process which privileges Science “in the making” over “ready-made” Science.
In Educational Sciences, in particular Science Education Research, this conception has two major consequences. The first one refers to the fact that, in order to understand Education, one has to understand two fundamental actions, the teaching action and the learning action, both in their conceptual structure and their empirical unfolding here and now. The second consequence rests on the same logic and refers to the knowledge ontology within the educational process. This knowledge is not seen as a thing, but as a praxeology (Chevallard and Sensevy 2014): a praxis...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Chevallard Y, Sensevy G (2014) Anthropological approaches in mathematics education, French perspectives. In: Lerman S (ed) Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer, Dordrecht
Fleck L (1981) Genesis and development of a scientific fact. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn TS (2012) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Ligozat F (2011) The determinants of the joint action in didactics: the text-action relationship in teaching practice. In: Hudson B, Meyer MA (eds) Beyond fragmentation: didactics, learning and teaching in Europe. Barbara Budrich Publishers, Opladen/Farmington Hills, pp 157–176
Sensevy G (2012) About the joint action theory in didactics. Z Erziehungswissensch 15(3):503–516
Sensevy G, Tiberghien A, Santini J, Laube S, Griggs P (2008) An epistemological approach to modeling: cases studies and implications for science teaching. Sci Edu 92(3):424–446
Sensevy G, Forest D, Quilio S, Morales G (2013) Cooperative engineering as a specific design-based research. ZDM 45(7):1031–1043
Tiberghien A, Malkoun L (2009) The construction of physics knowledge in a classroom community from different perspectives. In: Schwarz B, Dreyfus T, Hershkovitz R (eds) Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction. Routledge, New York, pp 42–55
Tiberghien A, Sensevy G (2012) Video studies: time and duration in the teaching-learning processes. In: Dillon J, Jorde D (eds) The world of science education: handbook of research in North America, vol 4. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei, pp 141–179
Tiberghien A, Vince J, Gaidioz P (2009) Design-based research: case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. Int J Sci Edu 31(17):2275–2314
Venturini P, Amade-Escot C (2013) Analysis of conditions leading to a productive disciplinary engagement during a physics lesson in a deprived area school. Int J Educ Res 64C 170–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sensevy, G. (2014). Action and Science Learning. In: Gunstone, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_372-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_372-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6165-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education