Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fallstudien und Process Tracing in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft

Part of the book series: Springer NachschlageWissen ((SRS))

Zusammenfassung

Process Tracing hat sich in den letzten Jahren als zentraler methodischer Ansatz zur Durchführung von Fallstudien herauskristallisiert. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird zunächst auf Fallstudien allgemein und ihr Bezug zur vergleichende Methode eingegangen. Dann wird Process Tracing als methodischer Ansatz vorgestellt. Beispiele von Process Tracing in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft und der Analyse Europäischer Integration illustrieren die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aldrich, John, und Kenneth Shepsle. 2000. Explaining institutional change: Soaking, poking, and modeling in the U.S. Congress. In Congress on display, congress at work, Hrsg. William T. Bianco, 23–45. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert. 1998. The International Coffee Organization: An international institution. In Analytic narratives, Hrsg. Robert Bates et al., 194–230. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert et al. 1998: Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert, et al. 2000a. Analytic narratives revisited. Social Science History 24: 685–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert, et al. 2000b. The analytic narrative project. American Political Science Review 94: 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, Derek, und Rasmus Brun Pedersen. 2013. Process tracing methods. Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew. 2010. Process tracing and causal inference. In Rethinking social inquiry. Diverse tools, shared standards. Hrsg. Henry Brady und David Collier, 2. Aufl., 207–220. Lanham: Rowman & 310 Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew, und Jeffrey Checkel. 2012. Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. Simons Papers in Security and Development No. 21. Vancouver: School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew, und Jeffrey Checkel. 2015. Process tracing: From metaphor to analytical tool. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew, und Alexander George. 1998. An alliance of statistical and case study methods: Research on the interdemocratic peace. APSA-CP Newsletter 9(1): 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, Joachim, und Markus Haverland. 2012. Designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, David. Hrsg. 1979. The new authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, David. 2011. Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics 44(4): 823–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Ruth Berins, und David Collier. 1991. Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Harry. 1966. Division and cohesion in democracy. A study of Norway. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Harry. 1992. Case study and theory in political science. In Regarding politics. Essays on political theory, stability and change, Hrsg. Eckstein Harry, 117–176. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 2000. Rational choice history: A case of excessive ambition. American Political Science Review 94: 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard. 1977. U.S. house members in their constituencies: An exploration. American Political Science Review 71(3): 883–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard. 1986. Observation, context, and sequence in the study of politics. American Political Science Review 80(1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard. 2003. Going home: Black representatives and their constituents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander, und Andrew Bennett. 2004. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, John. 2007. Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Avner. 1998. Self-enforcing political systems and economic growth: Late medieval genoa. In Analytic narratives, Hrsg. Robert Bates et al., 23–63. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague, Rod, et al. 1998. Comparative government and politics. An introduction. 4. Aufl. Houndsmill: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Detlef. 2006. Einführung in die vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Todd. 2008. Issues and methods in comparative politics. An introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauth, Hans-Joachim. 1985. Der Staat in Lateinamerika. Die Staatskonzeption von Guillermo O´Donnell. Saarbrücken/Fort Lauderdale. Verlag fﺰr Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauth, Hans-Joachim, Gert Pickel, und Susanne Pickel et al. 2013. Vergleich politischer Systeme: Eine Einführung. Paderborn u. a. Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret. 1998. Conscription: The price of citizenship. In Analytic narratives, Hrsg. Robert Bates et al., 109–147. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret. 2002. Modelling complex historical processes with analytic narratives. In Akteure-Mechanismen-Modelle. Zur Theoriefähigkeit makro-sozialer Analysen, Hrsg. Renate Mayntz, 108–127. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The politics of accommodation. Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1971. Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review 65: 687–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies. Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of democracy. Government form and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James. 2000. Rational choice theory and the comparative method: An emerging synthesis? Studies in Comparative International Development 35: 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang, et al. 2003. Defekte Demokratien: Theorien und Probleme, Bd. 1. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang, et al. 2006. Defekte Demokratie, Regionalanalysen, Grauzonen, Bd. 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The choice for Europe. Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, Gerardo. 2001. Game theory and comparative politics: New perspectives and old concerns. World Politics 53: 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muno, Wolfgang. 2009. Fallstudien und die vergleichende Methode. In Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft. Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen, Hrsg. Susanne Pickel et al., 19–36. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy 7(4): 112–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Craig. 2003. A certain idea of Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Guy B. 1998. Comparative politics. New York: Theory and Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1996. The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist perspective. Comparative Political Studies 29: 123–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles. 1992. Introduction: Cases of „what is a case?“. In What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry, Hrsg. Charles Ragin und Howard Becker, 1–18. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles. 2000. Fuzzy-set social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlfing, Ingo. 2012. Case studies and causal inference: An integrative framework. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, Stein, und Henry Valen. 1964. Regional contrasts in Norwegian politics. In Cleavages, ideologies and party systems: Contributions to comparative political sociology, Hrsg. Erik Allardt und Yrjö Littunen, 162–238. Helsinki: Academic Bookstore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. 1998. The political economy of absolutism reconsidered. In Analytic narratives, Hrsg. Robert Bates et al., 64–108. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Compare why and how. Comparing, miscomparing and the comparative method. In How to compare nations. Concepts, strategies, substance, Hrsg. Mattei Dogan und Ali Kazancigil, 14–34. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2006. Prozessanalyse. In Methoden der Politikwissenschaft. Neuere qualitative und quantitative AnalyseverfahrenJoachim Behnke et al. Hrsg., 263–272. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2015. Efficient process tracing: Analyzing the causal mechanisms of European integration. In Process tracing. From metaphor to analytical tool, Hrsg. Andrew Bennett und Jeffrey Checkel, 98–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetvtsova, Lilia. 2004. The limits of bureaucratic authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 15(3): 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 2000. Theory tackles history. Social Science History 24(4): 669–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Syemour Martin, und Stein Rokkan. 1967. Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives, Hrsg. Seymour Martin Lipset und Rokkan Stein, 1–64. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney. 1967. Some dilemmas in comparative research. World Politics 20(1): 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry. 1998. Political stability and civil war: Institutions, commitment, and American democracy. In Analytic narratives, Hrsg. Robert Bates et al., 148–193. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagare, Frank. 2009. Explaining the 1914 war in Europe: An analytic narrative. Journal of Theoretical Politics 21(1): 63–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagare, Frank. 2011. The games of July: Explaining the great war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Mainz, Jakob-Welder-Weg 12, 55128, Mainz, Deutschland

    Wolfgang Muno

Authors
  1. Wolfgang Muno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Muno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Würzburg, Germany

    Hans-Joachim Lauth

  2. Univ. Hildesheim Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Hildesheim, Germany

    Marianne Kneuer

  3. Universität Leipzig Theologische Fakultät, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany

    Gert Pickel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this entry

Cite this entry

Muno, W. (2015). Fallstudien und Process Tracing in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft. In: Lauth, HJ., Kneuer, M., Pickel, G. (eds) Handbuch Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Springer NachschlageWissen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02993-7_6-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02993-7_6-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02993-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation