Skip to main content

Covenant

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion
  • 46 Accesses

Historically, the word “covenant” has both political and religious antecedents. Its earlier usage has been linked more to the ancient Near Eastern treaty traditions which go back to the Hittites and remained central in neo-Assyrian imperial politics (Schaper 2015). Such treaties, especially the vassal treaties, have been shown and/or argued in contemporary literature to have deeply influenced the Israelite concept of berith (Schaper 2015; Douglas and Tenney 1987). The biblical word berith often translated covenant which formed large part of the book of Deuteronomy “oscillates between the notion of the contractual and that of obligation or self-obligation” (Schaper 2015, p. 365). In the Hebrew Bible, there are four kinds of covenants, namely: the Noahic, the Abrahamic, the Mosaic, and the Davidic (Gn 8–9, 12:1–3, 17:1–14; Ex 19:5–6; 2 Sm 7:12–16). As argued by Schaper (2015, p. 365) “The notion of covenant is central to the Hebrew Bible and became the focus of the Jewish...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Carpintero, H. (2015a). Behavior. In R. A. Segal & K. von Stuckrad (Eds.), Vocabulary for the study of religions (pp. 158–162). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpintero, H. (2015b). Behaviorism. In R. A. Segal & K. von Stuckrad (Eds.), Vocabulary for the study of religions (pp. 162–168). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. D., & Tenney, M. C. (Eds.). (1987). New international bible dictionary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. (2017). Covenant and moral psychology in polycentric orders. In P. D. Aligica, P. Lewis, & V. H. Storr (Eds.), The Austrian and Bloomington schools of political economy (Advances in Austrian economics, Vol. 22, pp. 107–132). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polischuk, P. (2016). The new covenant as a paradigm for optimal relations: Marital principles derived from a theological-psychological integration. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, R. (1980). The impact of covenant and contact theories on conceptions of the U. S constitution. Publius, 10(4), 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, J. (2015). Covenant. In R. A. Segal & K. von Stuckrad (Eds.), Vocabulary for the study of religions. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Benyah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Benyah, F. (2019). Covenant. In: Leeming, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200044-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200044-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27771-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27771-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics