Synonyms
Definition
Consumer health informatics (CHI) is the branch of medical informatics that analyzes consumers’ needs for health information, studies and implements methods of making health information accessible to consumers, and models and integrates consumers’ preferences into health information systems. Consumer health informatics stands at the crossroads of several disciplines, including nursing informatics, public health, health promotion, health education, library science, and communication science; and is perhaps the most challenging and rapidly expanding field in medical informatics (Eysenbach 2000). Consumer health informatics is applicable to all consumers, regardless of age, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status.
Overview
In 1995, Ferguson introduced the term consumer health informatics as a new generation of medical information systems that serve both the doctors and the patients (Ferguson 1995). The traditional means for consumers to obtain...
References
Alexopoulos GS, Meyers BS, Young RC et al (2000) Executive dysfunction and long-term outcomes of geriatric depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57(3):285–290. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.57.3.285
Ali SF, Muhammad MP (2014) Patient preference regarding their role in clinical decision making process: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Educ 6(2):192–195. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-9357.2014.00632.1
Bath PA (2008) Health informatics: current issues and challenges. J Inf Sci 34(4):501–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508092267
Bloom G, Berdou E, Standing H et al (2017) ICTs and the challenge of health system transition in low and middle-income countries. Glob Health 13(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0276-y
Bluethmann SM, Coa KI, Alfano CM (2018) Electronic health information exchange opportunities for self-management of care: responses from older adults with and without cancer history in the United States. Curr Oncol Rep 20(4):30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0674-1
Coughlin SS, Heboyan V, Young L et al (2018) Use of a web portal by adult patients with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus seen in a family medicine outpatient clinic. J Hosp Manag Health Policy 2:21. https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp.2018.04.04
Demiris G (2016) Consumer health informatics: past, present, and future of a rapidly evolving domain. Yearb Med Inform 25(S 01):S42–S47. https://doi.org/10.15265/IYS-2016-s005
Devlin AM, McGee-Lennon M, O’Donnell CA et al (2016) Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: lessons learned during the implementation of the Dallas program in the United Kingdom. J Am Med Inform Assoc 23(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv097
Dou K, Yu P, Deng N et al (2017) Patients’ acceptance of smartphone health technology for chronic disease management: a theoretical model and empirical test. JMIR mHealth UHealth 5(12):e177. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7886
El Sherif R, Pluye P, Thoer C et al (2018) Reducing negative outcomes of online consumer health information: qualitative interpretive study with clinicians, librarians, and consumers. J Med Internet Res 20(5):e169. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9326
Emery EE, Lapidos S, Eisenstein AR et al (2012) The brighten program: implementation and evaluation of a program to bridge resources of an interdisciplinary geriatric health team via electronic networking. Gerontologist 52(6):857–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns034
Eysenbach G (2000) Recent advances: consumer health informatics. BMJ 320(7251):1713–1716. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1713
Ferguson T (1995) Consumer health informatics. Healthc Forum J 38(1):28–33
Goldberg L, Lide B, Lowry S et al (2011) Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics: current trends and future challenges. Am J Prev Med 40(5S2):S187–S197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.009
Haluza D, Naszay M, Stockinger A et al (2017) Digital natives versus digital immigrants: influence of online health information seeking on the doctor-patient relationship. Health Commun 32(11):1342–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1220044
Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL et al (2005) Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first health information national trends survey. JAMA Intern Med 165(22):2618–2624. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618
Hsu WC (2019) The effect of age on electronic health literacy: mixed-method study. JMIR Hum Factors 6(2):e11480. https://doi.org/10.2196/11480
Jacobs W, Amuta AO, Jeon KC (2017) Health information seeking in the digital age: an analysis of health information seeking behavior among us adults. Cogent Soc Sci 3(1):1302785. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1302785
Kim H, Xie B (2017) Health literacy in the ehealth era: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 100(6):1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.015
Kim KK, Sankar P, Wilson MD et al (2017) Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers. BMC Med Ethics 18(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x
Lewis D, Chang BL, Friedman CP (2005) Consumer health informatics: Informing consumer and improving health care. ISBN 978-0-387-27652-6. Digitally watermaked, DRM-free. see: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387239910
Massey PM (2016) Where do U.S. adults who do not use the internet get health information? Examining digital health information disparities from 2008 to 2013. J Health Commun 21(1):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1058444
Park H, Cormier E, Gordon G et al (2016) Identifying health consumers’ ehealth literacy to decrease disparities in accessing ehealth information. Comput Inform Nurs 34(2):71–76; quiz 99. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000205
Sbaffi L, Rowley J (2017) Trust and credibility in web-based health information: a review and agenda for future research. J Med Internet Res 19(6):e218. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7579
Silver MP (2015) Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. J Med Internet Res 17(1):e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3588
Uei SL, Kuo YM, Tsai CH et al (2017) An exploration of intent to use telehealth at home for patients with chronic diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(12):1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121544
Watkins I, Xie B (2014) ehealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 16(11):e225. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3318
Zhang Z, Yu P (2019) Medlineplus. In: Gu D, Dupre M (eds) Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Springer Nature, Singapore
Zhang X, Yu P, Yan J et al (2015) Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Serv Res 15:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0726-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Yu, P., Zhu, Y., Halim, U.Z., Hailey, D. (2019). Consumer Health Informatics. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_440-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_440-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences