Skip to main content

Radiological Assessment of Hydrocephalus Treatment and Treatment-related Complications

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Clinical Neuroradiology

Abstract

In neurosurgical practice hydrocephalus is the most commonly treated condition, with surgical complication being a common event. After initial diagnosis, there are varied surgical options, including internal intracranial CSF diversion with neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy and extracranial CSF diversion either within the body via a shunt or without as an external drainage system. Clinical neuroradiology is the principal investigation that guides diagnosis, selection of treatment, and detection of complications. Increasingly radiology is used in theater to directly guide surgical treatment with neuronavigation becoming central in efforts to drive down the risk of complication. Longer term a surgical hydrocephalus service must remain vigilant to late complications and ultimate shunt failure.

This publication is endorsed by: European Society of Neuroradiology (www.esnr.org).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 979.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

ETV:

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy

EVD:

External ventricular drainage

VA shunt:

Ventriculoatrial shunt

VP shunt:

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

References

  • Algin O, Ucar M, Ozmen E, Borcek A, Pzisik O, Ocakoglu G, Tali T. Assessment of third ventriculostomy patency with the 3D-SPACE technique: a preliminary multicenter research study. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:1347–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargallo N, Olondo L, Garcia AI, Capurro S, Caral L, Rumia J. Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency by quantification of CSF stroke volume by using cine phase-contrast MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2514–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouras T, Sgouros S. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. A review. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;7(6):643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeyer D. Techniques of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2004;15:51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey AT, Kimmings EJ, Kleinluqtebeld AD, Taylor WA, Harkness WF, Hayward RD. The long-term outlook for hydrocephalus in childhood. A ten year cohort study of 155 patients Paediatric. Neurosurgery. 1997;27(2):63–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chari A, Czosnyka M, Richards H, Pickard JM, Czosnyka ZH. Hydrocephalus shunt technology: 20 years’ experience from the Cambridge Shunt Evaluation Laboratory. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(3):697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartal MG, Algin O. Evaluation of hydrocephalus and other cerebrospinal fluid disorders with MRI: an update. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:531–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC, Dirks PB. Imaging correlates of successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(6):915–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kupeli E, Yilmaz C, Akcay S. Pleural effusion following ventriculo-pleural shunt: case reports and review of the literature. Ann Thorac Med. 2010;5(3):166–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lollis SS, Mamourian AC, Vaccaro TJ, Duhaime AC. Programmable CSF shunt valves: radiographic identification and interpretation. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1343–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, et al Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346. (Published 21 May 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkler AE, Ch’ang J, Parker WE, Murthy SB, Kamel H. The rate of complications after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:654–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reaper J, Collins SA, McMullan J, Bayston R. The use of ASET (Anti Staph Epidermidis Titre) in the diagnosis of ventriculo-atrial shunt infection. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2010;7(Suppl 1):S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde V, Behm T, Ludwig H, Wachter D. The role of neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopic procedures. Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35(3):351–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainte-Rose C, Hooven MD, Me MS, Hirsch JF. A new approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1987;66(2):213–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stivaros S, Sinclair D, Bromiley P, Kim J, Thorne J, Jackson A. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: predicting outcome with phase-contrast MR imaging. Radiology. 2009;252:825–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinchon M, Dhellemmes P. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: risk factors and long-term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22(7):692–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinchon M, Rekate H Kulkarni AV. Shunt independence. Pediatric hydrocephalus outcomes: a review. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2012; 9:18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang VY, Barbaro NM, Lawton MT, Pitts L, Kunwar S, Parsa AT, Gupta N, McDermott MW. Complications of lumboperitoneal shunts. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(6):1045–8; discussion 1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Chiewvit S, Nuntaaree S, Kanchaanapiboon P, Chiewvit P. Assessment lumboperitoneal or ventriculoperitoneal shunt patency by radionuclide technique: a review experience cases. World J Nucl Med. 2014;13(2):75–84. PMCID: PMC4150163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed A, Avinash K, Khaled B, Athar A, Priyabrata D. Intracranial shunts: a brief review for radiologists. Curr Trends Clin Med Imaging. 2017;1(4):555567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodt T, von Falck C, Tschan C, Diensthuber M, Zajaczek J, Krauss J, Galanski M. Radiological evaluation of ventriculoperitoneal shunt systems ECR 2009; Poster No C-702. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AN, McConathy J, Menias CO, Bhalla S, Wippold FJ II. Imaging evaluation of CSF shunts. AJR. 2014;202:38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick John McMullan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

McMullan, P.J., Romanowski, C.A.J. (2019). Radiological Assessment of Hydrocephalus Treatment and Treatment-related Complications. In: Barkhof, F., Jäger, H., Thurnher, M., Rovira, À. (eds) Clinical Neuroradiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68536-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68536-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68535-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68536-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics