Skip to main content

High-Threat Chemical Agents: Current Trends and Future Perspective

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Security Science

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview, classification, brief description of each class, and known adverse effects upon exposure to chemical warfare agents (CWA). Medical management and treatment that currently constitute protocols of the military strategists, first responders, and medical personnel are discussed. Analytical methods, technologies, and commercially available systems for monitoring and early detection of chemical agents are also presented. This chapter surveys current and near-term detection technologies, as well as devices that are currently available to military and civilian first responders. Brief technical discussions of several detection technologies are provided, with emphasis placed in the principles of detection. Requirements imposed on detection systems by various applications and environmental needs are discussed in order to assess the devices for detection and identification of specific CWAs. A synopsis of the important aspects of chemical detection technologies and a preview on the needs of future devices for real-time detection and identification of CWAs are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamov A et al (2007) Interfacing an aspiration ion mobility spectrometer to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Rev Sci Instrum 78(4):044101

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Augerson W (2000) A review of the scientific literature as it pertains to Gulf War illnesses: volume 5: chemical and biological warfare agents. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2017) http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39500947. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  • Cajigas JC et al (2003) Testing of HAZMATCAD detectors against chemical warfare agents: summary report of evaluation performed at Soldier Biological and Chemical Command. Microsensor Systems, Inc, Bowling Green

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Disease Control AEL Guideline (2003/2004) https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/demil/cwaelfs.htm. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  • Chauhan S et al (2008) Chemical warfare agents. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 26(2):113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croddy E Perez-Armendariz C, Hart J (2000/2002) Chemical and biological warfare: a comprehensive survey for the concerned citizen. Copernicus Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense (2005) Field manual: treatment of chemical agent casualties and conventional military injuries. USDOD, Army Knowledge Online, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (2006) Toxicological profile for cyanide. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Homeland Security (2005) Guide for the selection of chemical agent and toxic industrial material detection equipment for emergency first responders guide 100-04, vols I and II: summary. Saver, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiceman A et al (1995) Enhanced selectivity in ion mobility spectrometry analysis of complex mixtures by alternate reagent gas chemistry. Anal Chim Acta 306:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatah A et al (2000) Guide for the selection of chemical agent and toxic industrial material detection equipment for emergency first responders. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorov L (1994) Chemical weapons in Russia: history, ecology, politics. Center for Ecological Policy of Russia, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick S (2005) Chemical and biological weapons. In: Weapons of mass destruction: an encyclopedia of worldwide policy, technology, and history. ABC-CLIO Inc., Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill SMH (2002) Conventional analytical methods for chemical warfare agents. Pure Appl Chem 74(12):2281–2291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofacre K et al (2004) Environmental technology verification report, Bruker Daltonics Inc. RAID-M Ion Mobility Spectrometer. Prepared by: Battelle, Inc. Columbus, OH for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://nepis.epa.gov/EPA/html/DLwait.htm?url=/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100D0LP.PDF?Dockey=P100D0LP.PDF

  • Kangas MJ et al (2016) Colorimetric sensor arrays for the detection and identification of chemical weapons and explosives. Crit Rev Anal Chem 47(2):138–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum J (2006) Chemical warfare secrets almost forgotten. ChemBooks Inc, Santa Rosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum J, Salem H (2008) Chapter 12: Incapacitating agents. In: Medical aspects of chemical warfare. Department of the Army and US Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosal M (2003) The basics of chemical and biological weapons detectors. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronman C (2003) Arly grants commercial license for topical skin protectant technology. Chemical and Biological Defense Information Analysts Center Newsletter

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine H (2000) Chemical and biological weapons in our times. Franklin Watts, A Division of Grolier Publishing, Danbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Longworth T et al (2000) Domestic preparedness program: testing of MIRAN SapphIRe portable ambient analyzers against chemical warfare agents summary report. Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin T, Lobert S (2003) Chemical warfare: toxicity of nerve agents. Crit Care Nurse 23:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccafferty P, Lennarson P (2002) Common chemical agent threats. Neurosurg Focus 12(3):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone T (2000) Detecting and monitoring chemical agents. In: Strategies to protect the health of deployed U.S. Forces: detecting, characterizing, and documenting exposures. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzayanov V (1995) Dismantling the Soviet/Russian chemical weapons complex: an insider’s view. In: Chemical weapons disarmament in Russia: problems and prospects. Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray G, Southard G (2002) Sensors for chemical weapons detection. IEEE Instrum Meas Mag 5:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odierno R (2012) Toxic chemical agent safety standards. Department of Army, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong K et al (2000) Domestic Preparedness Program: testing of APD2000 chemical warfare agent detector against chemical warfare agents, summary report. ECBC, Edgewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacsial-Ong E, Aguilar Z (2013) Chemical warfare agent detection: a review of current trends and future perspective. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 5:516–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reutter S (1999) Hazards of chemical weapons release during war: new perspectives. Environ Health Perspect 107(12):985–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said-Moorehouse L (2017) http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/30/middleeast/syria-khan-sheikhoun-chemical-attack-sarin/index.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  • Sferopoulos R (2009) A review of chemical warfare agent (CWA) detector technologies and commercial-off-the-shelf items. Australian Government, Department of Defence, Fishermans Bend

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea D (2003) High-threat chemical agents: characteristics, effects, and policy implications. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidell F, Takafuji ET, Franz DR (2008) Chapter 14: Triage of chemical casualties. In: Davis LB (ed) Medical aspects of chemical and biological warfare. The Office of the Surgeon General at TMM Publications, Borden Institute, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KA (2009) Detection of chemical weapons and industrial toxins. ObservatoryNANO (Technology Sectory-Security; Sub-sector-Detection; Segment-Chemical Weapons), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolski H (2000) Looming threats to U.S. security rethinking bio-chemical dangers. In: Biosecurity and bioterrorism: annexes, Foreign Policy Research Institute Wire 44(2):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Ong K (2005a) Chapter 2: Chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals. In: Detection technologies for chemical warfare agents and toxic vapors. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Ong K (2005b) Chapter 5: Detector selection factors. In: Detection technologies for chemical warfare agents and toxic vapors. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (1996) NATO handbook on the medical aspects of NBC defensive operations, AmedP-6(B). Departments of the army, the navy, and the air force

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapp R (2010) “Incapacitating chemical agents”: implications for international law. ICRC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker J (2006) War of nerves: chemical warfare from World War I to al-Qaeda. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker J (2010) The future of chemical weapons. New Atlantis J Technol Soc Fall 2009–Winter 2010(26):3–26. https://www.thenewatlantis.com/docLib/20100316_TNA26Tucker.pdf

  • Tuorinsky S, Sciuto A (2008) Chapter 10: Toxic inhalational injury and toxic industrial chemicals. In: Davis LB (ed) Medical aspects of chemical and biological warfare. The Office of the Surgeon General at TMM Publications, Borden Institute, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen K (2001) Determination of soman and VX degradation products by an aspiration ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 440:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (2015) Medical management of chemical casualties handbook. USAMRICD Chemical Casualty Care Division, Aberdeen Proving Ground

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Medical Research, Material Command (2000) Skin exposure reduction paste against chemical warfare agents (SERPACWA). US Army Medical Research Materiel Command, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhay S et al (2011) Organophosphorous compounds – toxicity and detection approach. In: Pesticides-strategies for pesticide analysis. InTech, Rijeka

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohltjen H, Dessy R (1979) Surface acoustic wave probe for chemical analysis. I. Introduction and instrument description. Anal Chem 51(9):1458–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2004) Chapter 3: Biological and Chemical Agents. In: Public health response to biological and chemical weapons, WHO guidance, Health aspects of chemical and biological weapons, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eden Joy Pacsial-Ong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pacsial-Ong, E.J. (2018). High-Threat Chemical Agents: Current Trends and Future Perspective. In: Masys, A. (eds) Handbook of Security Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51761-2_15-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51761-2_15-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51761-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51761-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics